Revised! Interactional foundations for critical AI literacies doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Gods speak, spirits speak, computers speak. Oracular ambiguity or statistical probability provides loopholes, and discrepancies are expunged by Faith.” — Ursula K. Le Guin, The Left Hand of Darkness (1969)
Post
Featuring luminaries like @abeba.blacksky.app @wolven.blacksky.app @lucyosler.bsky.social @sarahciston.com @olivia.science @irisvanrooij.bsky.social and classic work by Ada Lovelace, Lucy Suchman, Margaret Boden, Harold Garfinkel, Ellen Langer, Joseph Weizenbaum among many others
One bit I reworked is the section dealing with so-called prompt engineering. Shoutout to Ursula Franklin, whose notion of prescriptive technology is particularly useful to understand how "it is not only the prompt that is being engineered, but also the prompter." More: zenodo.org/records/2136...
and building on a.o. Patricia Collins & Paolo Freire: > To be critical is to combine discernment —an ability to see through and demystify things— with radical intentionality: a readiness to question assumptions, to speak truth to power, and to imagine futures worth wanting doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
0 reposts7 likes
On RLHF: > Preference tuning is often sold by model providers as contributing to model “guardrails”, a reassuringly solid metaphor for what is in fact at best a hopeful collection of probabilistic, error-prone and context-dependent techniques to curb model output (cf @sarahciston.com 2026)