Post

I co-sign this great summary from @dereklowe.bsky.social . The goal is to destroy academic science, and these are the reasons. And all the “gold standard” and “needs reform” and “not high risk” stuff is transparent bullshit to hide the ball on what they are doing.

Derek Lowe@dereklowe.bsky.social

Thoughts on the various Trump administration proposals to revamp US science funding - and what they all have in common:

Buckle your chinstraps and join the fight. Standing up and speaking out is working. The more clear speaking we can do, the more effective we will be.

There are a few other related reasons: 1. They want to consolidate (presidential) power over all govt spending 2. They hate gov’t and want to destroy it (see @bartlettb.bsky.social ), and privatize 3. They think AI will replace science so who cares 4. Anyone w/ a PhD is their political opponent

(See K Rove), and science runs on PhD level experts; they want to crush those careers 5. They want to destroy universities because they are always pro-democracy and oppose autocracy. Many of these overlap with Derek’s summary to one extent or another.

Also: We keep hearing that a number of Congressmembers think that everything at NIH has gone back to normal, and the Trump appointees are in fact on the side of saving NIH. That is false. Things at NIH are WORSE than last year. Please reach out to your senators and reps and tell them that.

36 reposts80 likes

How could they possibly believe that? Rep. Bill Foster is a decorated member of the APS, surely there must be ways for Congress to hear about the damage? There was just a massive signature push to save American science from OMB? I find that assumption baffling unless if reached by willful ignorance.