Post

Correct. Vought and Bhattacharya want to do to NIH what they have gotten further with at NSF- turn it into a slush fund for their political preferences. But peer review is popular, and it is required by law. So they are slowly chipping away at peer review process in an effort to break it.

This post is unavailable.

Mark Histed

@markhisted.org

This is why “presidential priorities” should be greatly curtailed. No, the White House should not get to decide the direction of US science. We should go back to the longstanding method of setting science priories before 2025: legislation, based on open debate in the sci community and public.

10/10/26, 3:22 pm3 reposts12 likes

No replies yet.