Post

The NY Times saves its harshest skepticism for progressives. Instead of being impressed by 3,000+ coordinated protests, NYT dismisses the value of “hitting a number” and asks if No Kings will be “a primal scream that fades into a whimper.” F off, NY Times. We'll defeat fascism w/o you. (Gift link)

nytimes.comA Challenge for ‘No Kings’ Protests, the Third Time Around

Inverted Pyramid

@invertedpyramid.bsky.social

28 Mar

Save your venom for the writer, Jeremy Peters. He’s terrible.

Rick does Math and Stuff

@mathandstuff.bsky.social

Sulzberger deserves the lion's share of the blame. He's the force that has made the Times into what it is. Without him, Peters would not have been granted this position.

28/3/26, 2:55 pm0 reposts1 like

No replies yet.