Post

"As we've said before, the bar for removal under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment is quite high. One little remark about approving the deaths of tens of millions of Americans at the hands of a foreign power shouldn't warrant such a severe response." buff.ly/utv8fhC

buff.lyRelax, We Can’t Invoke the Twenty-Fifth Amendment Every Time a President Offers to Let an Enemy Bomb an American City“As we’ve said before, the bar for removal under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment is quite high. One little remark about approving the deaths of tens of millions o...

6/10/26, 6:25 pm49 reposts206 likes

Norman Wilson (⚠️extremely tired) 🔵

@oclsc.bsky.social

Of course not. This doesn't call for the 25th, it calls for impeachment, conviction, removal, and criminal trial for treason.

Jerrod

@jerrod.bsky.social

To be fair, he offered the home of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, San Diego, as an alternative to Los Angeles, the second largest city by population and GDP in the U.S.

the25hurts.bsky.social

@the25hurts.bsky.social

It's well past time to contemplate a constitutional amendment allowing a direct popular vote to remove a sitting president, regardless of legislative action, in the event of this sort of treason.