Post

2. In general we make certain assumptions to get by. We tend to assume the external world is as it seems, and further that when we encounter other beings in it, who arose in ways analogous to us, and respond to the world in recognizable ways, that they too have a conscious experience.

3. This assumption of a conscious experience is not proportional to linguistic output. I assume dogs are conscious, and I think most people share this intuition. I certainly assume non verbal humans are conscious.

4. The first iteration of ChatGPT was already more linguistically fluent than a dog. I see no threshold for presumption or even supposition of consciousness that LLMs have passed since then, that they hadn't already passed.