Post

I see here yet another failure of Open Core to work out for the creator of an Open Source project. $27B of apparent value for an editor, none of it realised by Microsoft; and the value/lock-in proposition actually ended up being ripe for vendor-neutral duplication.

From an ROI perspective I would argue Code has more than paid for itself. Microsoft is back in the game, and Code was a big part of that.

1 repost2 likes

Yeah. And the open core analysis is also very different when you’re MS than when you’re a startup. Ultimately VS is a complement to GH and Azure, so if Cursor succeeds in getting people to write a lot more code… those complements are still going to do very well for MS.