Post

An "Adult Logic Puzzle" book with a clearly AI generated cover? Well, I'm sure they wouldn't have used AI to make the actual puzzles! Oh... oh.

12/10/26, 12:35 pm3 reposts41 likes

Chrinosart

@chrinos.art

The second comment. Who the fuck tries to solve puzzles with ChatGPT. Fucking losers.

Harry 💬

@halisavakis.com

There's also definitely something to be said for the person that gave money to buy a book of puzzles (a scam at that) only to use ChatGPT when they got stuck on a puzzle in the puzzle book they bought, the puzzles of which they wanted to solve

AJ Jefferies

@moonjam.com

It's too good. The kind of person whose entire search history is "[LAST THING I SAW/READ] ending explained"

John Scary Name Cullen

@nellucnhoj.bsky.social

Also, what the hell is going on with that character "design"

Matt Nelson

@mattnelsonart.bsky.social

If this were some kind of cryptid called the Southeastern Man-Handed Porcucat, I'd accept it, but the Porcucat doesn't exist.

Rick Schmitz

@rickschmitz.bsky.social

Don’t you mean a Double-Tailed Southeastern Man-Handed Porcucat?

Matt Nelson

@mattnelsonart.bsky.social

Holy balls I didn't even notice the second tail, I was so distracted by its horrible little man hands.

AJ Jefferies

@moonjam.com

omg... what's that behind you!?

Matt Nelson

@mattnelsonart.bsky.social

oh that's just Candleja-

John Scary Name Cullen

@nellucnhoj.bsky.social

John Scary Name Cullen

@nellucnhoj.bsky.social

Also, fecking hell at the "shot-chaser" aspect of the second review, saying they tried to get Chat GPT to solve the puzzle.

AJ Jefferies

@moonjam.com

Yes! I really enjoyed that. An ouroboros of stupidity.

AJ Jefferies

@moonjam.com

Absolutely everything

Davy's Art Corner

@dcartcorner.bsky.social

There's something really funny about ChatGPT not being able to solve a likely AI generated puzzle

bookwyrmknight

@bookwyrmknight.bsky.social

When you 100% should judge a book by its cover.

Daniel Rigal 🇪🇺 🦋

@danielrigal.bsky.social

I love that the reviewer checked with ChatGPT and that couldn't make any sense of the AI generated bullshit either. If AI really was a superintelligence then its utterances would make sense to its AI peers, if not to us mere mortals. If one AI can't parse the output of another then it's no good.