Post

NEW: Jeanine Pirro needs two more weeks to figure out why she wants to dismiss the Oath Keepers' seditious conspiracy charges. She filed to vacate them nearly 2 months ago, s you'd think she'd have a reason by now. Her motion is unopposed because her and the Oath Keepers are on the same side.

452 reposts1.4K likes

That’s who THAT CORRUPT CRIMINAL LYING FELON wants to PROVIDE HIM w/ ARMED IDIOTS when HE tries to RIG, SABOTAGE & STEAL 2026 ELECTIONS away from the AMERICAN VOTERS so WE the PEOPLE can’t get Democrats in Majorities in our SENATE & HOUSE so they can STOP HIS DESTRUCTION of Americans & USA!🇺🇸

As a U.S. attorney she needs to keep her oath and they are Oath keeper's? You know like the battle of Britain was a British battle? We are saying the same thing right?

Agreed. It's simple to figure it out: just make it two sentences. She is on the same side. The O.K.s are on the same side, therefore.... SHE and the O.K.s are on the same side.

It's very basic grammar but the use of her instead of she has exploded in the last couple of years. It is amplified by TV shows that have actors using the poor grammar and by others on cable/ internet doing the same. It's laziness.

I can't help but think of all the movies where the narcissistic loser begs for another chance while coming unglued because they really need it. They haven't learned anything and in fact are repeating the same cycle ad nauseam. Nonetheless, they think they're entitled to perks they haven't earned.

According to my Webster's fulsome means "offensive to the senses of of moral or esthetic sensibilities: disgusting" "exceeding the boundaries of good taste"--how appropriate from Pirro

Judges really don’t like it when a party asks for an extension of time at the very last minute. I wouldn’t be surprised if the judge completely denies the request, or only gives Pirro a one or two day extension instead of the two weeks she‘s asking for.

And typically, if you’re asking the court for an extension, your request should explain why you couldn’t comply with the original deadline. It looks like Pirro didn’t offer any explanation. That’s another good reason for the judge to deny it.

Can't the judge deny the motion on the grounds that she's already had two months? I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me like if you ask the court for a thing, you should have the reason for the request at the time the request is made.

There is NO reason other than Trump said MAKE IT SO, So she is in between a rock and a hard place. If she submits anything, she is one again in a position of possibly Defrauding the court. I doubt she every will.

If Dems ever get back in charge, there needs to be a whole bunch of new rules written up for how government should run. All the stuff that people thought would never be attempted, has been, and with much success.

Did you check with the counsel and did they accept giving box-of-wine/whine pirro the extra time to try to make up a reasonable excuse for doing the illegal? Since 🤡💩trump already let them all out of jail, what logical reason is there to go even further to coddle them? None that I can see!

you'd think she would have had the reasons BEFORE filing to vacate. she sounds like the frat girl who hasn't done any work all term asking if she can do extra credit on the last day of class.

The incompetence is staggering. She also has to gauge that about 75% of the country is against this big time. But that’s not gonna stop them from owning the Libs I guess. She might need a few more wine deliveries to get through this