Post

Richard Barnes
@ipv.sx

OK, I wrote up a whole blog post with some more detailed thoughts on this. Curious if anything here resonates with other folks. Thanks to @iame.li, @dholms.at, and @bnewbold.net for helpful pointers and discussions! pckt.blog/b/bits-of-en...

pckt.blogAll data should be permissioned data - Bits of EntropyMy post with vague complaints about the proposal that made for permissioned data got a bit of attention. Daniel was kind enough to take the time to chat with me...
Richard Barnes@ipv.sx

@dholms.at - What is the right venue for discussion on this Permissioned Data proposal you wrote up. atp@ietf.org or something else? I think it is wrong in some pretty fundamental ways. Or at least the motivations are poorly articulated.

github.comgithub.com
neko
@neko.moe.observer

i don't think users expect that things they post are signed by their pds in a way where they're hard to deny after the fact, as one could with doctored screenshots. it's kinda bad enough in public atproto, but it's needed for relaying records. if we don't have that requirement anymore, why keep it?

0 reposts3 likes

No replies yet.