Post

Eric
@ericasco.bsky.social

I apologize for being unclear here. The point I was trying to make is that he did not lose his citizenship because the right to birthright citizenship was upheld.

Daith
@attentir.bsky.social

My problem with SCOTUS is that they give us the easy ones to rule on and the freebies, but still they hand over power to a maniacal dictator like he’s god. Trump is only going to get worse.

Art Martin
@gartmartin9.bsky.social

yes--that's the way to frame it--as a "blow" to Trump. Nothing matters more to the NYT than how it plays for the Orange man. If you were an honest media outlet--you would lead with the fact that 4 Supreme Court judges wanted to take away a constitutional right. Utterly lawless and rogue.

plutoeros.bsky.social
@plutoeros.bsky.social

Justice Thomas wrote a 90+ page dissent because apparently this is not clear language: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Marissa Louise
@marissadraws.bsky.social

How fucking dare you frame it this way. I am sorry to lose my temper here, but following established constitution, BARELY, is not a blow to Trump. Unless you jackasses are finally admitting he is anti-constitution, anti-government, authoritarian.

Spicy Jalapeno
@jalapeno7.bsky.social

4 justices don't believe in Birthright Citizenship! This judgment was for an EO, imagine if congresses passing a bill that allows for president to strip citizens of their citizenship. Roberts and ACB won't be so kind, because that was bill would be passed by congress and not an EO.

Aria B4 🇨🇦
@ariabehbuh.bsky.social

No it didn't. Trump may have lost, but GOP is just starting on this. Tha fact that this wasn't 9:0, it is already a loss for the constitution. This is now on slow burner, and it will ne the next Roe for GOP.

Mayba 6
@mayba6.bsky.social

In a June 30, 2026, ruling, three Supreme Court justices voted against birthright citizenship by dissenting in the case Trump v. Barbara.The Court struck down President Trump's executive order in a 6-3 decision, reaffirming that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to children born in the U.S.

Aditya Mukerjee 🦦 🏳️‍🌈
@chimeracoder.bsky.social

No, Kavanaugh partly concurred and partly dissented. There were four votes in favor of abandoning the Fourteenth Amendment. bsky.app/profile/chri...

Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Fourteenth Amendment protects birthright citizenship, blocking Donald Trump's executive order to end it. Roberts has the opinion for the court, which is 5-4 on the constitutional question and 6-3 on whether federal law protects birthright citizenship.

cool kevin
@berrey.bsky.social

what if we admitted d.c.'s neighborhoods as 127 states of 30k people? a simple majority in congress could do it in 2027. save the soul of the nation?👇 harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...

harvardlawreview.orgPack the Union: A Proposal to Admit New States for the Purpose of Amending the Constitution to Ensure Equal Representation Harvard Law ReviewFor most of the twenty-first century, the world’s oldest surviving democracy has been led by a chief executive who received fewer votes than his...