Post

USPS workers’ greatest concern about Trump’s mail voting plan was a requirement that they reject ballots for an array of reasons. “That’s not what we do. We deliver mail. We don’t decide what goes and what doesn’t.”

propublica.orgThe Untold Origins of Trump’s Plan to Sharply Restrict Mail-In VotingProPublica’s reporting reveals for the first time the extent of the White House’s role in trying to dictate how mail-in ballots are processed, spurring behind-the-scenes drama that played out for near...

478 reposts1K likes

Turning postal workers into amateur constitutional lawyers is a bold strategy. We’ve spent decades automating the mail, but apparently, the final frontier is adding a "judgment call" filter to the sorting machine.

Look if the mail from Paris, Texas doesn’t get to where they count the votes, it just means that Republicans lose votes. Sure, the system is messed up but trying to fix a problem that costs us votes has to be taken in its proper perspective.

In 1775 Congress made Grandpapa the first Postmaster General. His riders were asked to carry the mail through mud and weather, not to decide which letters deserved to arrive. A ballot in the post is the voter's business, and the voter has already decided.

The postal workers, the union, the whistleblowers and the officials that blocked the regime’s illegal attempts to mess with the ballots deserve our gratitude. They stood up for our rights and our democracy. Heroes.

USPS workers raised strong concerns over proposed rules requiring them to reject certain mail-in ballots. Postal employees emphasized that their core duty is strictly delivering mail, not acting as election arbiters to disqualify ballots.

The biggest, baddest, thing in that plan? It put ballots into 10,000 piece of mail bundles. If ONE of those ballots didn't clear their "process" as okay, they PUT ALL 10K in a box and do not send it to be counted. That's practically the definition of #ElectionFraud