Post

The Trump administration is now going after its first cybersecurity company, stripping @sentinelone.com of "any active security clearance." Will the infosec industry do any better than the legal industry in showing solidarity? www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/...

loafsta.bsky.social

@loafsta.bsky.social

9 Apr 2025

They’re not going after the company, they’re going after Krebs.

Raphael Satter

@raphae.li

Suggest you carefully read the EO and get back to me.

9/4/25, 9:32 pm0 reposts21 likes

loafsta.bsky.social

@loafsta.bsky.social

9 Apr 2025

Let me rephrase: They’re going after the company to go after Krebs. Either way, it’s not about SentinelOne and never was.

Justin Smith

@odd-dimensions.bsky.social

9 Apr 2025

You were wrong, then you tried to walk it back by saying you were not wrong, trust you, with no evidence to the contrary? This is how we got here. 🤡

loafsta.bsky.social

@loafsta.bsky.social

9 Apr 2025

Smh. I wasn’t wrong, my point was the EO was targeted at Krebs, not the cybersecurity industry. SentinelOne is just collateral damage, swept up because it’s “associated” with Krebs, who is CIO. I mean, look at the WH press release:

whitehouse.govFact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Addresses Risks from Chris Krebs and Government CensorshipRESTORING TRUST IN GOVERNMENT: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum revoking any active security clearance held by Chris

Justin Smith

@odd-dimensions.bsky.social

9 Apr 2025

1. A press release is not a legal document it is propaganda. 2. The EO - which you clearly did not read - also targets individuals associated with Krebs or entities, which is the entire company. 3. If they can do it to one person they can do it to anyone. 4. 3, but for companies. 5. Retaliatory.