Wait. Didn't Charlie say people getting shot was an acceptable price to pay for having the second amendment? Surely he would have been proud to be one of the ones shot, right? Why are they dishonoring his memory like this?
Generally if you visit a public institution with the goal of spreading hate, they make you provide your own security. Sucks fir him that he was too cheap to do it properly.
From the article
“The Charlie Kirk estate and its heirs, including Erika Kirk and her two children, as well as "prospective plaintiffs" that include Charlie Kirk's parents, Robert and Kathryn Kirk, have filed a notice of claim against UVU”
Did she blow through all the money already?
I was taught everything happens according to god’s plan.
Would they have sued if their property was damaged by Noah’s flood?
Shouldn’t they have faith that the lord’s plan will one day be revealed?
How about, if you're gonna incite violence, you need to provide your own security? Or at least talk in a venue with some metal detectors? I really, really don't want to blame the victim here, but this isn't "Don't dress like that," it's "Don't sue the Grand Canyon after you jump the railing."
Kirk had his own full security detail on the day he got his shit CLAPPED 👏
This is just tpussa circling the drain & desperately trying to grab onto the deepest pockets a judge will laugh in their face over.
Anyways
I remember a GamerGate target cancelling a talk at a Utah school because they said it was illegal to prevent firearms in the room. What kind of security did Kirk’s family expect?