Post

Never sure where I sit with singers harmonising with themselves on records as it breaks the illusion that you're listening to a thing that happened as a single performance. I suppose the answer is there's times when I think it's fine, and there's times when I think, jeez let the band sing too.

1 repost6 likes

I'd have to listen to that track again to see what you mean but it's amusing to think of Neil doing the main vocal, and the Chris interjecting with the h-h-h-heart beat bit.

That's what I meant really. And the Oh-ah-oh-oh thing. They re-re-process Neil loads and turn him into an instrument on most tracks but the only time I've ever gone, "eh?" is on the Introspective version of Always. Totally allowed the rest of the time

Just given Heart a listen and the ah-ah-ah-ah synth bit doesn't break my sense of single performance as it's so clearly a sample of Neil played on keyboard. Chris *could* be doing it live, having sampled Neil before the performance. Yes Chris might need several hands to but hey.

I like the human voice basically - let's hear the people. It's just easy contrast built into a group - someone will have a soft voice, someone will be a shouter, maybe someone can do weirdly low notes. Get them all in there.

Obviously the best example is the Beatles, it means (as well as all the other things that made them great) every LP or live show is a variety show, with things constantly being different. But even as great as Freddie Mercury is, giving the odd vocal to Brian and Roger kept things interesting.