Post

yet another thing to put in our back pocket. "ship em to the Hague" is a completely valid option for a long and growing list of people who need to be dealt with

Tom Dannenbaum@tomdannenbaum.bsky.social

Declaring that no quarter will be given is straightforwardly prohibited under international humanitarian law. When done to threaten an adversary, the declaration itself amounts to a war crime. www.nytimes.com/2026/03/13/u...

155 reposts844 likes

We would have to have elected officials that would choose to sign on to that, and unless we have a historic turnover in both party and ideology, that does not seem likely. But, it does seem more likely that we are headed into historic times then not.

onedominoaway.com/the-nurember... America & War Crimes America is not a signatory to the ICC America does not belong to the ICJ America Exempted itself from The Nuremberg Structure The Hague - holds no jurisdiction over America The Hague - has no teeth against America

onedominoaway.comThe Nuremberg Conditions: Why the ICC Cannot Reach America » One Domino AwayThe Nuremberg Conditions: Why the ICC Cannot Reach America - The Argument of Sovereignty and Exclusion and Membership

I don't think it is because the next republican administration will invade the netherlands to release them. It's just not a tenable thing to ask them to house our prisoners given the political situation here and our military power. they would have to be tried and imprisoned here.

There are jurisdictional issues, but I think they're probably overstated. We, or Iran, or any other country, can submit a 12(3) declaration to the ICC recognizing their jurisdiction over particular crimes over a particular period. We could even extend jurisdiction back to 2002.