Post

Folks I hate to be a hater but this plot literally says “We are the best and the cheapest at the tasks we made up and the prices we set” This is a 100% meaningless chart.

mr. TIM@timkellogg.me

Jev: Fable-level model that doesn’t charge for output tokens because they’re too cheap to meter it’s not general though, it only makes decisions, doesn’t generate text, but input tokens are measured by the billion ($42/btok) typesafe.ai/blog/introdu...

Ian Bicking

@ianbicking.org

15 Sept

The interesting to me is thing to me is that it's shaped very differently from an LLM, like it's just a structuring machine. But then yeah, hard to compare head-to-head with other things.

Maxine 💃🏼

@maxine.science

15 Sept

I mean, this is a model class that has existed before. But it’s pretty sweet markwting—look how edgy and cool it looks!

Amber 🌸

@shimmermathlabs.com

my conclusion after playing with it is that i agree with you Maxine. it's fun marketing, has some cool webpages. it's a nice little model which i suspect is a finetune-ish variant of deepseek or qwen or something. the alternate interface of choices+bools and stuff is very fun to play with.

16/9/26, 1:05 am0 reposts9 likes

Amber 🌸

@shimmermathlabs.com

16 Sept

the playground page and api also seen to work and be somewhat polished which i appreciate. but this is not some huge groundbreaking thing, is basically a variant interface. which isn't to say they didn't invent stuff to make it nice, just that the hype is outrunning the reality at the moment.

Amber 🌸

@shimmermathlabs.com

16 Sept

i also ROLL MY EYES at the fact they don't have ANY PAPERS out talking about the tech. come on, this is not science. would love to be proven wrong. if founders of typesafeai are reading this show me details of the tech, show me architecture of the model, real comparison to others, more deets.