Post

General consensus in the replies and quotes of this seems to be that the entire concept of "AI skills" is a joke - how hard is typing text into a chatbot, really? I will continue to argue that it's genuinely difficult, and that the challenge in using these tools is widely underestimated

The first challenge is knowing what kind of problems are appropriate for AI assistance and what aren't - under what circumstances are you likely to see hallucinations? Which AI tools can provide real citations and which will just make them up?

How come supposedly the most advanced computer systems we have ever built can't look up facts, can't do long division and can't count the number of Rs in strawberry? (Except when they can, because some of them can consult external databases or run Python or JavaScript code to use as a calculator)

Did you know ChatGPT now has two entirely different ways of running Python code? The rules of what those can do are utterly baffling simonwillison.net/2024/Dec/10/...

I don't think students should take classes on how ChatGPT Code Interpreter differs from ChatGPT Canvas - that would be like teaching MS Word specific VB macros in "intro to computers" I do think there's a lot of space for helping teach students how to navigate these utterly weird new AI systems

This is a great point: learning how to ask clear, unambiguous, non-leading questions is vital for getting good results from LLMs and is a valuable skill in itself, independent of AI usage bsky.app/profile/mich...

If you don't believe in AI skills, what's your opinion on Google/search skills? I think learning to effectively use tools like Google is a greatly underrated skill as well bsky.app/profile/rod....

I was a very productive engineer because I always knew how to get the answers … either from Google or from other folks at work or other people online. I was barely above average at solving problems all by myself, but there are no points for that anyway.

Exactly this: bsky.app/profile/btuc...