Post

3. The judge ruled that the legislation relied on by the SRA was not "compellingly clear" that privilege could be overridden by the SRA, and noted that it was ultimately for Parliament to decide whether it would be desirable for the legal regulator to have the power it has until now assumed.

0 reposts1 like

4. This comes after London libel firm Carter-Ruck and their former client, businessman Mohamed Amersi, challenged the SRA, arguing that the legal regulator could not view legally privileged material without a waiver from the client who holds the privilege.