Post

Why do we use "non-decreasing" as a synonym for increasing? The negation is confusing. E.g., the sine function is not decreasing. Is the distinction between strictly and non-strictly increasing meaningful?

0 reposts8 likes

The distinction between the strict and non-strict version is useful, sure. For instance in analysis, any continuous monotone function is differentiable a.e. But its derivative is never zero if strictly increasing, while the Cantor function, which is non-strictly increasing, has zero derivative a.e.

The sine function is also not increasing, though ;-) I suppose there are just often many names for the same thing, but perhaps the origins are from different (sub-) fields? I actually like non-decreasing as I find it less ambiguous than increasing (which can be confused with strictly increasing).

Sure, of course it can matter, but do we need totally different terms? Wouldn't it make more sense to add a qualifier (strictly increasing vs. non-strictly increasing).

Don’t most people use the word increasing in everyday life to mean strictly increasing? If your boss said your salary was increasing next year and then it stayed the same, wouldn’t you object to the use of increasing?

Most people in everyday life wouldn't call a straight line a convex function (most people wouldn't speak about functions anyway, but well...). (Sorry for reviving this, just appeared in my timeline again)

in my experience convex is rarely, if ever, used in day to day life. most people who arent mathematicians seem unsure of the difference between concave and convex to begin with. not apples to apples imo since increasing is used by everyone pretty regularly, with an agreed upon meaning.