Dirk Lorenz

Dirk Lorenz

@dirque.bsky.social

Doing mathematics, also as a job. Now at Uni Bremen, was at TU Braunschweig. Only here for the math. Optimization, inverse problems, imaging, learning - stuff like that.

1K followers358 following570 posts

For my lecture "Mathematical methods for data analysis and image processing" I do a tl;dr slide at the end. This is the one for PCA:

For my lecture "Mathematical methods for data analysis and image processing" I do a tl;dr slide at the end. This is the one for the Frobenius inner product and gradients in matrix calculus:

For my lecture "Mathematical methods for data analysis and image processing" I do a tl;dr slide at the end. This is the one for the SVD and the pseudoinverse:

For my lecture "Mathematical methods for data analysis and image processing" I do a tl;dr slide at the end. This is the one for linear regression:

"Problem X has fallen" is a framing I've never connected with. I can relate to the feeling that working on a hard problem is a battle, but I don't see the problem as an enemy to be defeated. I see it as something to understand, and understanding isn't something that gets beaten.

Had a hard time grading seminar reports and presentations recently (you know, AI). Idea for next seminar: Give students papers I did not read (but would like to). They need to explain the paper to me (orally and in writing) and the grade is determined only by how good I understand.

Signs that academia may be for you: * eduroam works on the first try * you get your travel reimbursement without having to email anyone twice * you understand your institution’s course management system

Indeed! Also interesting that there was no urge to emphasize *human* computation or *human* calculation when it became possible that non-humans do these (or was there?)

Michael Kinyon@profkinyon.bsky.social

It's interesting that mathematicians now feel a strong urge to put the word "human" in front of the word "proof".

I noticed that LLMs already affect student presentations a lot, but now at #SIAMOP26 I realize that also here, people use ChatGPT et al. to produce their slides (at least, that's the obvious explanation for all the "Why this matters" boxes I see on slides...)

The exponential function has the remarkable property that it is the unique function f that satisfies the differential equation f'(x) = exp(x) with initial value f(0)=1.

Dirk Lorenz reposted

📢 #ISMP2027 comes to Amsterdam! The 26th International Symposium on Mathematical Programming will be held July 25–30, 2027. Join researchers from around the world to discuss advances, challenges, and opportunities in the theory and practice of mathematical optimization. 🔗 ismp2027.mathopt.nl #MOS

ismp2027.mathopt.nlismp2027.mathopt.nlThe 26th International Symposium on Mathematical Programming will be held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, from July 25th through July 30th, 2027. The event is the symposium of the Mathematical Optimization Society (MOS).

Am I right that a function that is not increasing and also not decreasing is in fact just creasing?

Why do we use "non-decreasing" as a synonym for increasing? The negation is confusing. E.g., the sine function is not decreasing. Is the distinction between strictly and non-strictly increasing meaningful?

Dirk Lorenz reposted

5 years ago today, Her Maths Story went live with our 1st story. What started as a small idea has grown into a global, supportive community celebrating #WomenInMaths. We’re deeply grateful to everyone who has shared, read, supported & believed in this journey. Here’s to the stories still to come 💛✨

Dirk Lorenz reposted

Does anyone have a links to good writing on what "trivial" means in mathematics? How we might define that type of thing? I get why people don't like the term, I want to help students seek out trivial examples/results as a way of getting familiar with whatever property we're working with. #MathSky

Dirk Lorenz reposted

New paper out! Together with my postdoc advisors @esoubies.bsky.social and Cédric Févotte :) We study the optimization landscape of L0-Bregman relaxations, which naturally arise when one optimizes non-quadratic fidelity terms coupled with the L0-norm. 1/n

arxiv math.OC@arxiv-math-oc.bsky.social

Jonathan Chirinos-Rodriguez, C\'edric F\'evotte, Emmanuel Soubies Optimization landscape of $\ell_0$-Bregman relaxations https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12157

New on arXiv: Why noise matters in learned regularization! Data-driven regularizers fail without noise structure. 🎯 Tikhonov, Lavrentiev, quadratic — not equal under non-white noise. 🤫 Spoiler: Optimal reconstruction needs proper noise modeling. 👉 Regularizer choice = structure and noise.

arxiv math.NA@arxiv-math-na.bsky.social

Sebastian Banert, Christoph Brauer, Dirk Lorenz, Lionel Tondji Why the noise model matters: A performance gap in learned regularization https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12521

So you agree that the sine function is not decreasing, but you won't say that it's non-decreasing? But alas math has such a precise language! 🧮

Why do we use "non-decreasing" as a synonym for increasing? The negation is confusing. E.g., the sine function is not decreasing. Is the distinction between strictly and non-strictly increasing meaningful?

Dirk Lorenz reposted

Join us for a panel on “Careers in Mathematics of Data Science” tomorrow morning!

siagdata.bsky.social@siagdata.bsky.social

Save the Date! The SIAM Activity Group on Data Science (SIAG/DATA) invites you to join us for a panel on the topic: Careers in Mathematics of Data Science Tuesday, August 12, 2025 | 9:00 AM PT | Zoom Webinar Panelists: Marta D’Elia, Elizabeth Newman, David Uminsky

Dirk Lorenz reposted

Dirk Lorenz reposted

Dirk Lorenz reposted

I've invented a simple, lovely math puzzle I expect every AI fails: Suppose you're a mathematical sailor at sea on a boat that has a perfectly cylindrical hole in the floor. All you brought is a collection of every p norm ball except p=2 (drat!). What do you do to cork the hole and save yourself?

A: A mathematical statement/concept makes intuitive sense. B: There is a sound framework where a mathematical statement/concept can be proven/defined. I tend to believe that A ⇒ B, but not vice versa. (Thinking about Dirac's delta and the Banach-Tarski paradox, for example.) #🧮