Post

A government u-turn on indefinite leave to remain would certainly not cost £10 billion - since the proposals would not have saved 90%+ of this figure. However, it is now a headache for the government that the Home Secretary made that claim in March. They should produce the real numbers

The Home Office told me at the time that the claim of a £10 billion "lifetime cost" (£9.5 billion) did not mean the Home Sec meant the government's proposals would save that £9.5 billion, but would not say what fiscal difference the government's proposals would make. bsky.app/profile/sund...

Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

The Home Office told me 3 weeks ago, this is not a claim the reforms save this £10 billion [in 3 decades, not 3-5 years] but govt won't tell MPs & peers if there is a fiscal saving (or cost) & how much it is & when www.politico.eu/article/uk-l...

Delaying settlement by 5-10 years makes no lifetime savings of the costs at 30 years. Just a marginal saving (about 5-10% of the £9.5bn) in first 5-10 years. If all care workers forced to leave, that £9,5bn is saved but 30 years of offsetting contributions sacrificed bsky.app/profile/sund...

Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

What govt have is the projection of a £9.5 billion lifetime cost (in 30 years time) if care workers stay for life (after they turn 65) This is just NOT a calculation of what govt policy saves by making them wait to 2036-40 not 2026-30 then stay for life. (That is obvs a v small number)

There is a much smaller fiscal cost of the settlement proposals than was suggested (maybe £600m-£1bn in next decade) but Home Office has stonewalled MP and Peer questions for the actual saving. There is a much bigger fiscal cost of the net migration reduction than that. bsky.app/profile/sund...

Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

Ironic Home Sec argues those oppose her settlement reforms must say how they would meet the fiscal costs 1. this £10 billion is fictitious + misleading - it is a cost in 30 years time - her reforms don't save that cost. 2. Yet Govt finds £5.4 billion negative hit of its immigration White Paper

A government which had confidence in its arguments about fiscal impacts could surely give factual answers to straight factual questions bsky.app/profile/sund...

Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

Stella Creasy asked 3 straight questions. - When do fiscal contributions + fiscal costs arise? - What impact does that have on the fiscal rules for 5 years? - How much would the proposed delay save (or not?) Was simply sent the £10 billion link, which appears irrelevant to these proposed reforms

4 reposts5 likes

No replies yet.