Post
The Home Office told me at the time that the claim of a £10 billion "lifetime cost" (£9.5 billion) did not mean the Home Sec meant the government's proposals would save that £9.5 billion, but would not say what fiscal difference the government's proposals would make. bsky.app/profile/sund...
The Home Office told me 3 weeks ago, this is not a claim the reforms save this £10 billion [in 3 decades, not 3-5 years] but govt won't tell MPs & peers if there is a fiscal saving (or cost) & how much it is & when www.politico.eu/article/uk-l...
Delaying settlement by 5-10 years makes no lifetime savings of the costs at 30 years. Just a marginal saving (about 5-10% of the £9.5bn) in first 5-10 years. If all care workers forced to leave, that £9,5bn is saved but 30 years of offsetting contributions sacrificed bsky.app/profile/sund...
What govt have is the projection of a £9.5 billion lifetime cost (in 30 years time) if care workers stay for life (after they turn 65) This is just NOT a calculation of what govt policy saves by making them wait to 2036-40 not 2026-30 then stay for life. (That is obvs a v small number)
There is a much smaller fiscal cost of the settlement proposals than was suggested (maybe £600m-£1bn in next decade) but Home Office has stonewalled MP and Peer questions for the actual saving. There is a much bigger fiscal cost of the net migration reduction than that. bsky.app/profile/sund...
Ironic Home Sec argues those oppose her settlement reforms must say how they would meet the fiscal costs 1. this £10 billion is fictitious + misleading - it is a cost in 30 years time - her reforms don't save that cost. 2. Yet Govt finds £5.4 billion negative hit of its immigration White Paper
A government which had confidence in its arguments about fiscal impacts could surely give factual answers to straight factual questions bsky.app/profile/sund...
Stella Creasy asked 3 straight questions. - When do fiscal contributions + fiscal costs arise? - What impact does that have on the fiscal rules for 5 years? - How much would the proposed delay save (or not?) Was simply sent the £10 billion link, which appears irrelevant to these proposed reforms
4 reposts5 likes
No replies yet.