I took a class on PC architecture in 1996. When I suggested that IRQ5 on the IBM PC in 1981 was intended for USB, my instructor threw something at me. Clearly I should have said it was intended for *USBs*.
This is definitely not what they're going for but interviewing techie people about basic ass tech stuff would probably be really funny if they did it right
Is that email from a huffpo related domain? Cause Caroline seems like she's a real person, but i'm surprised to see that list of questions from an actual reporter.
there might have been a mildly interesting linguistics angle on what things people referred to as “USB” in 2016, do they mean memory sticks, charging cables, the aux cord, the port?