Post

When you try to take away a monster's talent after finding out he's a monster, you are tacitly making a claim that enough talent can excuse monstrous behavior.

Annie Craton@anniezard.bsky.social

A month or so ago I saw a post by someone saying "we should all admit that Neil Gaiman has always been a shitty writer." That whole knee jerk revisionism. No, man, that's part of the whole horror. He's an internationally recognized writer. Objectively a good writer. But he's also a fucking monster.

1.2K reposts3.2K likes

Or, similarly but equally shitty, that it's okay to like monsters if you like their work. Like that if you like the work, then you should inherently push past what they've done. It's just a fucked up point of view

I hope so much that this era of cancellation shows the next generation of potential abusers that there will be consequences. Of course having a rapist and serial abuser of women in our highest office doesn't help.

I’d say it downplays the immense amount of power and cruelty he wielded too. There’s a difference in scale between a crappy writer who abused you versus a world renowned writer that everyone loves and praises for his talent who abused you.

It's another version of the medieval "prettiness denotes inherent goodness, ugliness denotes inherent evil" If someone believes only untalented people can be monsters, then that person will disbelieve any evidence against their heroes

ya; it's fair to say "I can't enjoy his writing anymore, given my awareness of the lens that informed it" or like "I can now see how elements of his problematism were laundered through my good faith reading" but like it's not like these weren't academic literary staples in fiction

Yeah, and like not all artists work for every person, but if you've never been a fan of a problematic artist after they get called out for bad behavior that's FINE, but maybe sit out the convo, because there are allegations in play more important than your taste pallet and they are CLEARLY popular

There are artists whose work I adored that turned out to be bad people, and of them I am vocal about not supporting them DESPITE their talent; and if there are artists who I've never liked I don't see the need to tell people that per se, because the people that DO like them need their minds changed

he IS a great writer and for years was one of my favourites. this shit broke my heart. finding out someone so important in my reading life was entirely the opposite of what he portrayed sucked! ... but that's not gonna make me give him a pass. fuck that

I feel like even calling him a monster helps take away from the fact that he is a human being capable of the things he did and got away with it for so long because he convinced his fans and everyone around him that he was a cool good dude. And the ones who saw him as he was just helped him continue.

On occasion I see someone trying to make the stance of.... "So and so isn't human, they're just a monster! People don't do horrible things!" Their argument gets squashed pretty quickly though, and they're usually the kind of person who is also surprised the leopard eating faces party ate their face.

I feel like it's a part of the larger problem of people wanting "good" and "bad" to be two immutable, mutually exclusive categories, and for all people to neatly fit into one or the other, even though the reality is never that simple. It's easy to think an evil person is inherently evil in all kinds

of ways from the get-go because it distances one from their own capacity to do evil. After all, when "bad people are always bad people", the next logical conclusion is the opposite, that good people are inherently good, regardless of circumstances or choices, and if one is good in one regard, means

they are good in all regards. It allows one to say "I am a good person, I couldn't have done bad things or have had bad intentions", in a way absolving the person from their own guilt in their head, and reassuring them that they or their loved ones can never be the horrifying things they see.

Which is why I consider "this bad person was never a good creative anyway" to be a fundamentally self-deceiving perspective. It appeals to one's innate desire of always being unmistakably morally right by dismissing the capacity of both good and evil, and a possibility of not recognizing the evil.

I entirely agree with this, but he's also a bad writer and I don't know what the rest of you have been on for the last 30 years. His best book by some way is the one Pratchett wrote with him. I guess the movie adaptation of Coraline was decent too.

You can be a great artist but a shitty person. You can be an absolute genius but a shitty person. You can be a goddamn hero and pillar of your community to every stranger, while being the most reprehensible villain to family… This is not a new song, people. It plays every year.

It is also making a claim that someone who is extremely talented cannot be a monster. In fact, the worst predators are extremely charming and talented. They groom not just the victim but everyone around them.

Had a conversation yesterday after church about why we didn't the obviously best hymn for the service. I acknowledged it is the best hymn for the moment, it's really great, and I've chosen not to use hymns by this person.

one of my favorite guitarists got exposed years ago as an esoteric nazi (even playing gigs with bands that openly only exist for recruitment)--and if anything, using musical ideas from people like him for good is a nice way of spiting them

I used to have a teacher who turned out to be a serial abuser. He taught me certain things really well. Neither of these facts detracts from the other. When I learned the truth, I supported his victims, denounced him and joined a different association

Cosby has always been a good comic, one of the best. It's like hearing a carpenter is a rapist and saying "well he never made good tables anyway." Like??? I've always disliked Neil Gaiman's writing personally (just not quite my tempo) and I don't want to even say that anymore bc of this implication

I'm in the same boat - I bounced off Sandman, really didn't like American Gods, and I've bounced off all Gaiman-related material my husband's tried to introduce me to, but because it didn't click with me, not because I have some special sixth sense for detecting sex criminals.