@simonwillison.net reading through your clean room post, have you thoughts on the Ai output is not copyrightable, ergo it cannot be licensed either? SCOTUS refused to hear appeals a few days ago, so lower court ruling stands for now. This post explores, not a lawyer too tuananh.net/2026/03/05/r...
Post
tuananh.netRelicensing with AI-assisted rewriteExploring the chardet v7.0.0 controversy: Can an AI rewrite legally 'launder' a library from LGPL to MIT?
It is an interesting question as to how much human involvement is required. There was a patent cases as well (older, pre-agent). I would imaging the browser or Next JS reimplementations (with no human involvement) are likely pretty close to the image copyright case.
0 reposts0 likes
No replies yet.