Post

I'm in The Crimson today asking Harvard to "reboot" our relationship with AI by: matching investments in AI with investments in reading and writing; (re)constructing "analog" education infrastructure; and developing regulations from the bottom up (incl. departments and faculty committees).

thecrimson.comReboot AI | The Harvard CrimsonHarvard is overwhelmed by the volume and variety of issues related to AI. Trying to load too many processes simultaneously, we are incapable of running any of them. We need to reboot.

10 reposts41 likes

This is a great editorial! I always find it difficult to narrow the focus to one topic when it comes to AI, and your intro pulls that off really elegantly. Possibly of interest: I'm part of the Critical AI Working Group at Penn, and we just put out an editorial touching on some of the same ideas.

thedp.comMake Penn’s Critical Writing Seminars AI-freeGuest columnist Emily Hammer argues that a true commitment to high-quality writing instruction in the age of artificial intelligence requires hard limits. 

This is terrific. I didn't get into our writing program, but it's the KEY moment when the university can articulate the value of writing. Well done. I hope your administration listen!