Andrea Bacilieri

Andrea Bacilieri

@abacilieri.bsky.social

Postdoc @oxmartinschool.bsky.social | Research fellow @inetoxford.bsky.social | Complexity economics, food systems, supply chains, climate change, sustainability | www.andreabacilieri.com

90 followers129 following8 posts

Distribution of firm-to-firm transaction values spans more than 10 orders of magnitude, even in mid-sized countries. Sales, expenses, & the num of customers & suppliers are all positively correlated. We report precise and non-obvious elasticities. Many large firms actually have very few partners.

Bottom line: Understand measurement before studying production networks, as it shapes what is observed. Differences across datasets often reflect reporting rules, not real structure. 🎯 Benchmark for: • Working with firm-level networks • Calibrating macro models • Creating synthetic data

Some robust features we find: Distributions of the num of customers & suppliers: heavy-tailed, but very different exponents. Largest firms have a huge num of customers, but far fewer suppliers. Excess clustering & reciprocity: firms form dense clusters in which they trade with each other. ....

We systematically study the effect of the reporting threshold and show that 👉 Reporting thresholds systematically distort network statistics, and we can often identify the direction of the bias. ❗️Calibrating economic models using incomplete datasets can lead to targeting biased moments.

For example, the average number of trading partners can vary by an order of magnitude across datasets – largely driven by reporting thresholds rather than real economic differences.

There are several studies on specific countries – but what do we (really) know about nation-wide production networks? What have we learned from these studies? Why are there differences or similarities between them? Could major differences only be data artefacts? – As it turns out, yes!

Andrea Bacilieri reposted

You are up to date.