FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez

@agomezfcc.bsky.social

FCC Commissioner. Latina-American. Communications attorney and tech nerd. Dog mom.

5.4K followers26 following441 posts

Pinned

What Disney is facing is not a series of coincidental regulatory actions but a sustained, coordinated campaign of censorship and control. As I told their new CEO, the fight ahead may not be easy, but the law, the facts, and the public are on their side.

News coverage of a poll that doesn’t favor a political party is not an invitation to meddle in an election through intimidation. I'm urging the National Association of Broadcasters to stand up to this pressure and make sure every station knows what the law actually requires. 🧵

View full thread

Broadcasters did not sign up to serve as an arm of any political campaign, and they should not be made to choose between their license and their integrity. They should be free to report the news without fear of retaliation.

News coverage of a poll that doesn’t favor a political party is not an invitation to meddle in an election through intimidation. I'm urging the National Association of Broadcasters to stand up to this pressure and make sure every station knows what the law actually requires. 🧵

Such coverage does not come close to meeting the FCC’s own standards. News distortion requires proof of deliberate distortion of a factual report, and a broadcast hoax requires knowingly false information about a crime or catastrophe that causes immediate harm.

The FCC does not get to redefine the public interest standard as whatever happens to serve the political interests of whoever is in power. That standard exists to protect the audiences stations serve, not the officials who regulate them.

The FCC says it wants to stop the scourge of unwanted robocalls, but a dark money group’s petition to blast consumers with AI-generated robocalls would do the exact opposite. If the agency is serious about protecting consumers, it should dismiss that petition immediately.

It would be unconscionable for the FCC to agree to inundate consumer phones with unwanted AI-generated robocalls just weeks before an election. Unsolicited robocalls are the #1 complaint we get. The FCC should stand with consumers instead of the dark money groups pushing for this.

@schumer.senate.gov is right to be worried. As early as this week, the FCC could unleash a flood of unwanted robocalls as voters are already inundated with this junk. The last thing people want just weeks before an election is their phones overrun with AI slop.

Chuck Schumer@schumer.senate.gov

The FCC MUST reject the request made by a Republican group that would allow political groups to make robocalls to cell phones without people’s permission.

It’s true. The FCC has a radical plan that opens the door to dismantling the broadband program that helps schools and libraries connect students and seniors online. If this country is serious about winning the AI race, we need more (not less!) tools to bridge the digital divide.

Senator Ed Markey@markey.senate.gov

Brendan Carr’s FCC is threatening to end E-Rate, which has helped connect schools and libraries to the internet for 30 years. I led my colleagues in writing to Carr demanding that he abandon this effort. Students and communities cannot afford to lose E-Rate.

Did this story ever air on broadcast television? If not, I’m not sure what authority we’d have as an agency to investigate. In fact, I’m not sure the government should have a role here at all.

Brian Stelter@brianstelter.bsky.social

FCC source tells me Brendan Carr has directed the agency to open an investigation following this letter from Sen. Bernie Moreno about "ABC’s political hit job on Anduril & the Trump family"

Investigating news reporting carries fundamental dangers. When the government scrutinizes what journalists choose to cover and how they cover it, the chilling effect on a free press can reach well beyond any single story, and that risk should shape how we approach this.

View full thread

Consumers reasonably expect the rules protecting them from unwanted robocalls to hold steady while they decide how to vote, not for the FCC to change them at the 11th hour to unleash a deluge of political AI slop on their phones.

The FCC voted unanimously in 2024 to confirm that AI-generated voice calls are unlawful without the consent of the person being called, since an AI-cloned human voice is artificial by definition. A reversal of this interpretation would require a vote by the full Commission.

With nearly half of Americans struggling to afford the cost of living, the Lifeline program is helping them get online and stay online. We must pursue fraud wherever the evidence leads, free from politics and without taking support away from law-abiding families who rely on Lifeline.

The FCC's sole defense is that its review was required by process. The court appeared skeptical, and rightly so. Threatening license revocation is an extreme step, basically a death sentence over a speeding ticket. I remain confident the First Amendment will prevail here

Brian Stelter@brianstelter.bsky.social

Disney is in court in DC right now, seven weeks after suing President Trump's FCC for violating the First Amendment. Judge Loren AliKhan is hearing arguments over Disney's request for a temporary restraining order to block Brendan Carr from further challenging ABC’s local station licenses...

Yet again a court steps in to defend a free press and uphold the First Amendment. But this fight isn't confined to newsrooms banned from the White House. The FCC has been going after the press for coverage it doesn't like. Courts should draw that same line when its turn comes.

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez reposted

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez on Paramount-Warner Bros merger: “This settlement appears to pave the way for yet another massive media consolidation deal that could raise prices for consumers, reduce content diversity, and weaken editorial independence”

I'm disappointed this settlement appears to be yet another massive media consolidation deal that could raise prices for consumers, reduce content diversity, and weaken editorial independence. Here is what I'll be watching closely ⬇️🧵

View full thread

I'm disappointed this settlement appears to be yet another massive media consolidation deal that could raise prices for consumers, reduce content diversity, and weaken editorial independence. Here is what I'll be watching closely ⬇️🧵

The FCC just let some of the most repressive governments in the world indirectly control nearly all of a combined Paramount-Warner Bros. An investment this large in one of America's biggest media companies doesn't just buy equity, it secures influence over what gets said and what gets made.

That's why I called for this new and novel issue to go to a full Commission vote given what's at stake. Instead, the FCC snuck this ruling out as a staff-level decision, with no public vote and no accountability for a call of this magnitude. More to come on this soon.

This is now the second time in a matter of months that a late-night host has disclosed they had to bury an interview because of FCC intimidation. No host, local affiliate, or network should have to weigh federal retaliation before booking a guest for a newsworthy interview 🧵

View full thread

This is now the second time in a matter of months that a late-night host has disclosed they had to bury an interview because of FCC intimidation. No host, local affiliate, or network should have to weigh federal retaliation before booking a guest for a newsworthy interview 🧵

The FCC has no lawful authority to threaten broadcast licenses over guest bookings or editorial decisions. And yet there is no way to know how many other editorial decisions across the country have quietly been shaped by this same pressure.

News coverage of a poll that doesn't favor a political party is not a license to meddle in an election through intimidation. Broadcasters should take note. Do not let a sad and desperate attempt to punish accurate reporting become an excuse for censorship.

Polls can be wrong. That's no surprise to anyone who has followed politics over the last decade. The FCC faces a very high bar to prove news distortion, and it requires clear evidence of an intentional effort to mislead the public. Without it, this is all political theater.

This SCOTUS decision throws the midterm election into chaos. It allows the FCC to unleash a flood of dark money by letting a handful of wealthy donors pool unlimited contributions into political advertising. All this while forcing local broadcast stations to foot the bill ⬇️

With the right information, this scorecard could increase consumer awareness of how providers fight illegal robocalls. Much like Broadband Labels and the Cyber Trust Mark, I've supported efforts to inform consumers and hold industry accountable so I look forward to learning more.

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez reposted

As I've said many times, the FCC has no authority to punish journalists this administration doesn’t like. These threats to press freedom are dangerous. They undermine the foundation of our democracy, and they have no place in it.

USA TODAY@usatoday.com

President Donald Trump sharply criticized Kristen Welker, the moderator of NBC's "Meet the Press," after abruptly exiting an interview with her earlier this year.

BREAKING: An appeals court just moved to block the FCC’s plan to unleash new dark money spending on political broadcasting ads. This is a victory for transparency, the rule of law and for broadcasters who would've been asked to shoulder most of the costs of these dark money ads.

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez@agomezfcc.bsky.social

🚨In the final stretch of a national election, this FCC is helping unleash a flood of dark money into broadcast advertising. The American people should not have sweeping election-year rule changes forced on them in the dark and on the eve of an election. 🧵

🚨In the final stretch of a national election, this FCC is helping unleash a flood of dark money into broadcast advertising. The American people should not have sweeping election-year rule changes forced on them in the dark and on the eve of an election. 🧵

View full thread

🚨In the final stretch of a national election, this FCC is helping unleash a flood of dark money into broadcast advertising. The American people should not have sweeping election-year rule changes forced on them in the dark and on the eve of an election. 🧵

This unprecedented, last-minute decision gives the biggest political spenders an even bigger advantage over everyone else by expanding the candidate-only broadcast political ad discount established by law to joint fundraising and party committees.

Broadcasters are being directed to slash prices and sell their most valuable inventory during their busiest and most lucrative season, even as this same FCC has spent months arguing broadcasters need economic and regulatory relief to compete with Big Tech and streaming.

It’s high time that we have a corporate parent like Disney show courage, stand up and push back against this administration’s overreach and constitutional violations. This should be a welcome sign for every broadcaster who has felt the weight of government pressure in silence.