Ally Weir

Ally Weir

@allyjweir.co.uk

Work on software reliability and availability @ GitHub

73 followers177 following184 posts

The look of horror friends outside tech have after explaining OSS maintainers are unpaid yet hold up the world economy…

Ally Weir reposted

Replying to @grimalkina.bsky.social

The number of fucking times some staff in a medical office has called something unbelievable a "bug," whether real or not software itself is an accountability sink.

Ally Weir reposted

On dynamic pricing: a friend just asked me to check the price of a phone on Amazon. I got £529 and they got £440 Can’t help but think of Kant’s virtuous shop keeper who charges a fixed regular price even of inexperienced customers

My agents are getting better at just baking sleeps into their bash-isms just to wait on stuff finishing rather than handing back to me.

Ally Weir reposted

in a week that saw microsoft give activision the reins to halo and bungie pivot back to destiny, one thing has become abundantly clear: the people in charge do not have a long-term, overriding plan. they’re just reacting. the result, when times are bad, is chaos

Aftermath@aftermath.site

There is no plan aftermath.site/microsoft-xbox...

Tool exhaustion related to AI is something I'm experiencing and speaking to others they are too. There's so many different surfaces, tools, workflows. That then creates duplicate work to get set up and ends up with a fragmented experience across the different surfaces.

View full thread

A single surface that allows for: - durable identity agents over time that I can assign tasks - ability to schedule regular background work - sandboxed - network policy controlled - unique auth identity, safely mediated Beyond this, I want to see how we get the social aspect of AI workflows solved

If one team builds a really helpful agent/skill, how do I get that out to many folks in our org quickly? How do we standardise this stuff to let everyone benefit? How do folks discover new things and augment their agents with one-click installs, clear governance and pulling credentials in safely.

Tool exhaustion related to AI is something I'm experiencing and speaking to others they are too. There's so many different surfaces, tools, workflows. That then creates duplicate work to get set up and ends up with a fragmented experience across the different surfaces.

To try and help, I've really leaned back into custom agents and skills in one big directory. Just using the Copilot CLI for everything that I can. Narrowing back, focusing on how to make that experience better rather than reaching for a completely new conceptual model for each new goal I have.

Kiro Crew is a good example where they have created a single surface for all the different AI experiences. Bundled up with some UX polish atop. As a developer, I want to be productive. A year ago, Claude Code/Copilot CLI were that. Now, it's an application like Grok Bot or Hermes Agent.

Really cool to see some of the work coming out around agent runtimes. The early consolidation around OpenAI's chat and completion API model was right then but there's a whole layer ("substrate" apparently) of common functionality that is now being abstracted.

From another angle, I've also been poking at the edges of fly.io's new Spites offering for sandboxed environments. There's so much good work going on here and it's great to see how teams across the industry are solving this from different perspectives.

Hackathon over the weekend on a new OSS project, working with friends at other companies. Hadn't realised how much I took `/yolo` plus sandboxed dev environments for granted. Clicking 'Allow' on every prompt in VSCode with yolo locked behind an admin setting. 😬

AI has made it difficult for teams to estimate "time to deliver" or sizing effort. When AI works, you can go lightning fast. But what I've seen is project scope creep like never before. Simple efforts become defining new frameworks and building net-new toolchains.

View full thread

Yes, I sound like that grumpy senior you worked with early in your career. As we rocket through this chaotic era, balancing innovation with delivery is more important than ever.

AI has made it difficult for teams to estimate "time to deliver" or sizing effort. When AI works, you can go lightning fast. But what I've seen is project scope creep like never before. Simple efforts become defining new frameworks and building net-new toolchains.

Instead, I come back to the concept of "innovation tokens" in projects and in tasks I'm completing. We should limit innovation tokens and spend them where they will make the most difference. What is our project's unique value? Let's spend those tokens where we can make that shine.

But distinguishing between "the complex AI solution is meaningfully better" and YAGNI is a real challenge when chasing the dopamine hit. AI should help us work smarter and ship quality faster. YAGNI and KISS still apply! These acronyms have stuck around this long for a reason.

I've yet to dip into any of these agent platforms like OpenClaw yet. Definitely been curious about projects like Buzz and, to an extent, Grok Bot. But also, the Grok ick has touched this one. Makes me think it's worth waiting a few more months once these ideas have made it into other projects

Dare Obasanjo@carnage4life.bsky.social

A real dilemma. People whose opinions on tech topics I take seriously are saying good things about Grok Bot. It sounds like it nailed OpenClaw/Hermes for the masses but as a point of principle I don’t use MechaHitler. I would love an overview of what it gets right that everyone else missed.

View full thread

I dug into this more. Key innovation for me is durable agentic personas that can be addressed and act as contributors/collaborators rather than the work of AI being obscured behind a human's Personal Access Token. I want to know when the human did it vs. the AI.

It ties to my dichotomy of "agent-assisted" vs. "agent-driven". We will still have fuzziness for AI-assisted flows but damned, I'd just love to know when a clanker wrote it e2e.

I come to work to learn from others, collaborate and build systems that help make people's lives better. AI can help us do this better but fuck me, when we're replacing the human connection with it what are we doing. Spending time with others and creating connection with others is what matters.

One of our great shortcomings has been a lack of attribution. The early days of "give it a PAT" meant we've made it acceptable for things to be posted as people when it was robots. The faster our collaboration platforms can distinguish agentic personas from humans the better.

Picking the right tools can save literally years of development. The CNCF is such a treasure trove of incredible technology just sitting there waiting to be used, contributed to and shared. Teams sometimes don't realise how good we've got it when it comes to OSS

The project at top of mind today is Argo CD. Still my benchmark for CD solutions. At $LAST_CO I remember folks selecting it because of its whizzy Web UI. But you dig beyond that and just find an awesome collection of features organised with forethought and clarity ☺️

A lovely afternoon cooking ahead of the week. I’m definitely an autumn/winter cook. Think stews, broths and rich puddings.

Slack has changed the behaviour of the ESC key. A decade of muscle memory is killing me every time I am using it. Officially over the hill, can't adjust to keyboard shortcut changes. Time to become an Vim user? 🤔

Excited to see experiments like this coming from GitHub. The work done the past 2 years with Copilot has been incredible to watch from the inside.

GitHub Next@githubnext.com

New project from GitHub Next! Chopin is a real-time, multiplayer, agentic planning environment designed to align your team. Our current planning tools feel static, lonely, and drown us in walls of text. How can we make planning feel interactive, shared, and visual? githubnext.com/projects/cho...

I've yet to dip into any of these agent platforms like OpenClaw yet. Definitely been curious about projects like Buzz and, to an extent, Grok Bot. But also, the Grok ick has touched this one. Makes me think it's worth waiting a few more months once these ideas have made it into other projects

Dare Obasanjo@carnage4life.bsky.social

A real dilemma. People whose opinions on tech topics I take seriously are saying good things about Grok Bot. It sounds like it nailed OpenClaw/Hermes for the masses but as a point of principle I don’t use MechaHitler. I would love an overview of what it gets right that everyone else missed.

I do like the idea of 'sharing' channels with both humans and agents but I would _really_ like to get away from the pattern I see today where AI workflows dump walls of text into Slack channels. Kills discussion and collaboration.

Big Walk is as delightful as all the reviews suggested it would be. ❤️ To be expected from the team that made Untitled Goose Game.

Ally Weir reposted

Once upon a time this would get executives jailed under the Clean Air Act.

Floodlight@floodlightnews.org

NEW: Thermal drone footage shows the Microsoft-backed DataOne AI data center in Vineland, NJ is running dozens of gas generators. None of them have permits. A Floodlight visual investigation with @us.theguardian.com:

Building a new product from scratch can be a real challenge at any time, now with AI it's even more challenging. When anything is possible, and you can brute force solutions with tokens, how do you help a team remain focused on seeking the real value and delivering on that.

Telling a convincing story is certainly part of that. Building narrative that folks _want_ to buy into. A challenge I've faced is the greenfield project slipping towards the "everything app". It should solve all problems for all people in any way. And be ready in the next month!

Beyond narrative, I reach for the classic of "tight feedback loops". However as everyone becomes a contributor, there's an aspect that my time is better spent convincing others on that mindset of "feedback is life" and that its half-life is short so get it quick

Antonelli and Mercedes have been fantastic this year. I would dearly love to see Hamilton win his eighth with Ferrari and to do it this year in particular would be special.

Jeppe H. Olesen@jeppe.bsky.social

The final Zandvoort GP (for now) is in the books. These are the championship probabilities after the race: Antonelli: 64.1% (+2.2%) Hamilton: 16.7% (-3.6%) Russell: 8.7% (+0.2%) Leclerc: 5.2% (+0.1%) Norris: 5.1% (+2.3%) Verstappen: 0.2% (-0.8%) Piastri: 0.1% (-0.3%)