James

James

@astrocrash.net

Data scientist, gadget enthusiast, star destroyer, San Diego lover.

91 followers80 following507 posts

Paper day! arxiv.org/abs/2610.31860 There was a paper 18 years ago suggesting that other civilizations might deliberately modulate the pulsations of their periodic host stars to encode a signal as a beacon. In this paper I thoroughly test that idea by improving the physics & looking for candidates.

View full thread

It probably won't shock you to find that I come up empty: no beacons are detected with any statistical significance. IMO, this idea from Learned was a pretty interesting one that warranted a deeper study, and we never know if we don't look! Might as well spend some of our braincells on such things.

Paper day! arxiv.org/abs/2610.31860 There was a paper 18 years ago suggesting that other civilizations might deliberately modulate the pulsations of their periodic host stars to encode a signal as a beacon. In this paper I thoroughly test that idea by improving the physics & looking for candidates.

It turns out RR Lyrae are the only variables where it seems physically possible to modulate the signal, still requiring a KII-level civilization. I use publicly available data from TESS, ZTF, ASAS-SN of ~78,000 variable stars (Cepheids, RR Lyrae, and 𝛽 Cephei) to look for any sort of encoded signal.

My dad was a DJ in Paris in the 60s at a famous nightclub. There are a number of books about the place that are hard to find, written in French. I wanted to translate them but didn't want to take pictures of every page one by one. Thus I created piffler, the page riffler: github.com/guillochon/p...

github.comGitHub - guillochon/piffler: Turn a phone video of a book being flipped through into clean page scans, OCR text, and a searchable PDF.Turn a phone video of a book being flipped through into clean page scans, OCR text, and a searchable PDF. - guillochon/piffler

Pretty simple to use: take a video of yourself flipping page by page through the book you wish to digitize (spending ~1s per spread). Then, pass that video into piffler and...voila! An OCR'd PDF of the book. The code itself does not use an LLM, all traditional image processing algorithms.

It does however ship with an agent skill that can fine-tune some of the parameters the code uses to do the extraction, which can yield better results. I'm able to one-shot books this way. 4K video is ideal, book occupying most of the frame ideal. Takes a bit of time on a GPU, ~10 pages/minute.

The new "green" white dwarf really fascinated my kids, and in that same paper they note that there are WDs that are other exotic colors. Here's what those colors look like.

James reposted

Together with other scientists I’m suing the 🇺🇸 US National Institutes of Health for violating our 1st Amendment rights & censoring our health science. I’m ready to shine a light on the darkest days. Buckle up, read on. This gets pretty wild… THREAD

ACLU@aclu.org

By terminating research grants like Kelton's to censor views it doesn’t like, the NIH is blocking scientists from work that would advance public health for all of us. We're pushing back. Tell Congress to demand the NIH restore the grants and stop its censorship campaign at aclu.org/nih_censorship_

The site now uses AI agents to validate the info in the rows, while still also relying upon the community to provide policy updates (especially in cases where the visible policy online does not match department policy). I am still in the loop on edits, but this removes a ton of tedium for me.

Since this is a brand new effort, I'd appreciate any input folks might have! The new site has all the info of the old site, plus better data quality in general (better provenance, more frequently updated). I'm hoping it continues to be useful to the community in its refreshed form!

How about a total solar eclipse with sundogs during the ice crystal heavy snowball Earth era?

~350,000 years ago there was a nearby supernova named Geminga that was about as bright as the full moon. Would have been visible in the day.

To distract myself from horribly disappointing SD sports, I made a few upgrades to my historical sky color renderer. I added the moon, moonshine, eclipses, stars, more realistic clouds, atmospheric diffraction, and more! I also scale the moon based on epoch: it was much closer billions of years ago

For instance, if you allow doll bottoms to stack on doll tops, the number of combinations explodes very, very quickly. For 4 dolls there are 7,643 possible combinations. Explains why our Tupperware drawer always looks different every time I open it!

Been tackling OEIS sequences the past several days. There are ~400k sequences now, so finding the ones to go after is tricky. So I built a graph visualization of all of the nodes/relations using Cosmos. Really impressive software, ~60fps on a massively complicated graph.

As you might expect, the graph is dominated by things connected to primes, Fibonacci, etc. But the universe of completely disconnected sequences is the most interesting to me, lots of interesting substructure.

Another project : my daughter asked a question, "what color was the sky when the dinosaurs were around?" So...I computed it as accurately as I could! I have a writeup with the details coming soon, but in the meantime, explore what Earth's sky looked like throughout its life. earthsky.astrocrash.net

I run a bunch of processing on these stars in stages to try and filter out astrophysical or instrumental issues that could mimic a real signal, including the beating signals Hippke originally associated with the Kepler RR Lyrae they studied. I also try to extract binary sequences from modulation.

My conclusion: no variable star seems to show any statistically significant numerical sequence that isn't as well-explained as a natural phenomena. I knew this was going to be a unlikely search, but we gotta look from time to time! @astrowright.bsky.social Figured you might find this interesting.

well, i tried: searching 100,000 variable stars, no signs of aliens. still figuring out the best way to share these results since i a) don't have time to write a paper unassisted but b) do think the results/method should probably be shared. will prolly go with an ai-forward platform, not the arxiv.

If 2 mathematicians with AI and Claude Max almost solved a millennium problem, that’s a pretty good investment…hybrid human/AI is where it’s at. This phase where we’re uncomfortable with the notion of working with AI to accelerate advancement will pass, I think.

I'm convinced that progress on mathematically adjacent scientific publications will be *dominated* by AI, starting roughly now with the release of Fable 5.1. This includes astronomy, physics, etc. It runs absolute circles in speed and accuracy around any human.

Also convinced that referees *need* to use AI to keep up. Humans cannot keep up with the flux that's going to come from AI. And to be clear, I do mean quality AI-driven work here...it's creating results that are verifiably correct but at a rate so fast that we must design around it.