David

David

@auspolexplained.bsky.social

I explain how the Australian political system works to anyone who will listen. https://www.youtube.com/@AuspolExplained

143 followers70 following209 posts

Professor Anne Twomey came to Perth recently to give a talk about the importance of scrutiny of legislation and the dangers of rushing bills through parliament. It was fascinating (at least to me).

She illustrated a very clear point: parliamentary scrutiny is fundamentally important to ensure good government, avoid invalid laws that are undone in the courts, and catch any technical flaws in legislation. Remember: everyone in parliament plays an important role, not just the government.

Ok as of posting I notice that the VEC hasn't updated its website. As the bill has just passed I'm not sure if it's received assent yet, or possibly the VEC hasn't finalised its own wording for the website. But it'll be updated soon.

From a corporate perspective if Gen AI output is more realistic/convincing than a competing AI then it's a superior product. But that same metric means as it "improves" it becomes a more dangerous tool for misinformation and political disruption.

Limitations that make AI safer also make AI less useful, marketable or profitable. But it's also a tool that can be manipulated to shape public opinion against any regulations a government tries to impose to protect its citizens from harm. It's the new way to lobby MPs and manipulate politics.

I really cannot stress how bad AI is for our democracy. It's going to destroy trust, it's going to undermine public understanding of literally any issue, and it'll push political agendas that go against public interest.

AI is the largest existential threat to democracy. Every facet of it can be misused and weaponised to undermine public understanding of democratic institutions, the law and legislative process, and mislead and manipulate both the electorate and MPs themselves.

View full thread

It's not a matter of "if" AI will horrifically damage democracy around the world - it’s a matter of how much harm it'll cause. It's already eroding our democracy now. It's already a tool for election interference and misinformation.

Oh yeah plus AI is bad for other reasons like it's destroying the environment and stealing data and breaking copyright laws and destroying jobs and creating lower quality products with no benefits to consumers etc. But you know... democracy is important too. I'd like if we kept that one alive.

AI is the largest existential threat to democracy. Every facet of it can be misused and weaponised to undermine public understanding of democratic institutions, the law and legislative process, and mislead and manipulate both the electorate and MPs themselves.

View full thread

If an electorate office is getting 10,000 emails from AI pushing for a certain policy then how will that MP know what's a genuine request? How can they have time for any other requests? The electorate's desires will become completely disconnected from MPs actions and further entrench distrust.

AI can be so easily weaponised to destabilise and paralyse our political/democratic institutions. And once it's been used to destroy public trust it can then be used to promote polarisation, division and authoritarianism as an alternative to a broken system (that AI was used to break).

AI is the largest existential threat to democracy. Every facet of it can be misused and weaponised to undermine public understanding of democratic institutions, the law and legislative process, and mislead and manipulate both the electorate and MPs themselves.

View full thread

I literally cannot stress this enough: asking AI to explain any kind of law, policy, government decision, or what parties stand for is an inherently bad idea. At best you will be misinformed and at worst you will be manipulated towards whatever bias has been fed into the AI, intentionally or not.

But it's not just misinformation. MPs' offices can now be overwhelmed with fake emails at massive volume pretending to be humans demanding certain action, tricking MPs into thinking the electorate is pushing for certain policies. A single bad actor can manipulate MPs en masse.

AI is the largest existential threat to democracy. Every facet of it can be misused and weaponised to undermine public understanding of democratic institutions, the law and legislative process, and mislead and manipulate both the electorate and MPs themselves.

View full thread

Imagine the government makes a policy that upsets a tech company that has an AI model on millions of phones worldwide. You think that can't be used to manipulate what information people read? Vested interests has never had a greater ability to manipulate public opinion.

Of course AI in general is unreliable and hallucinates so no one should use it for any kind of research, but unfortunately people are being pushed to use it constantly and so will anyway. But even the non-hallucinated parts of the resultd can be unreliable and manipulated in many ways.

AI is the largest existential threat to democracy. Every facet of it can be misused and weaponised to undermine public understanding of democratic institutions, the law and legislative process, and mislead and manipulate both the electorate and MPs themselves.

View full thread

As AI cannot critically distinguish between fact and lies and the vast amount of data required to train models is too big to manually curate and fact check, it's impossible to ensure accuracy. If you rely on AI to explain ANYTHING political you risk being victim of misinformation.

People think the machine isn't biased, or that it somehow is authoritative because it gets information from so many sources. But these are products. Companies spend billions to make them appeal to you. It's inherently going to be biased towards the corporate interests of its programmers.

AI is the largest existential threat to democracy. Every facet of it can be misused and weaponised to undermine public understanding of democratic institutions, the law and legislative process, and mislead and manipulate both the electorate and MPs themselves.

AI programs like ChatGPT/ Claude/Gemini are trained to recognise patterns. You feed it enough text and it "learns" that the next word after "my name is..." is likely going to be a name not "pineapple". It mimics human language but it doesn't understand it. This appears impressive but is exploitable.

Imagine if you wanted to influence public opinion on a government action/policy. If you churn out enough misleading text on multiple online sources that AI will pull from then you can influence the results. ChatGPT can become a political mouthpiece for whoever can best exploit it.

There's a new episode! In my ongoing plot to teach you all the basics of Australian politics I've made a comprehensive explainer of what local government does, how it works, what it's for, and more!* Watch here: youtu.be/A3HRJsi0dZE *why it's constitutional

Though pride month ends the reminder is eternal that queerness and diversity is the most natural thing in the world. There is no point to denying this or trying to make anyone's life worse because of it. 🌈

Does it count as making it if looking me up on Instagram gets a reasonably OK (but a little jumbled) AI summary of my work? I guess I'm finally well known enough to be picked up by this garbage feature.

Reminder that it's still pride month. I hope everyone's remembering that discrimination against LGBTQIA+ people of any kind has no place in a fair or equal society and we're all just human beings that deserve dignity, respect and love. 🌈🏳️‍🌈✌️

Is anyone else constantly worried that the age of reasoned debate is soon to die a painful death at the hands of generative AI creating massive distrust in any form of information, real or otherwise, and everyone's going to splinter into ever more polarised echo chambers? Or is that just me?

There's a NEW Auspol Explained episode about how the Hansard record is the official record of parliamentary debates which I know doesn't sound like a great pitch but on the bright side if you think it's boring it's only a 5.5 minute long video so... what's the harm? Watch here: youtu.be/I8Rehlk0A0U

Good news! I finally got the quote to repair my camera lens and the sensor that was damaged by that pesky moth! It is $743 which is... oof. OK. At least in a couple weeks I'll be back in action. I can confidently say that is the most a single moth has ever cost me and moths are now my mortal enemy.

David@auspolexplained.bsky.social

A MOTH GOT INTO MY CAMERA LENS AND DIED??? It also scratched up my camera sensor so both the lens and camera I use for filming Auspol Explained videos is in for repair! Thankfully I filmed a couple episodes before the moth appeared so I've got something to edit but it'll be out of action for a while

If you're waiting for an update: so am I. I've not yet heard back from the repair people about time/cost. Oh well. Guess I'll just do some writing instead of filming.

David@auspolexplained.bsky.social

A MOTH GOT INTO MY CAMERA LENS AND DIED??? It also scratched up my camera sensor so both the lens and camera I use for filming Auspol Explained videos is in for repair! Thankfully I filmed a couple episodes before the moth appeared so I've got something to edit but it'll be out of action for a while

JUST A REMINDER. NO REASON. JUST A REMINDER THAT THE SEPARATION OF POWERS MATTERS AND POLITICAL FIGURES SHOULDN'T PREJUDICE ONGOING COURT CASES WHETHER INTENTIONALLY OR INCIDENTALLY.

David@auspolexplained.bsky.social

I just want to say apropros of nothing: court proceedings should never be politicised. The judiciary is an important part of any society and it's not there for popularity contests or culture wars.

Also remember that state/territory parliaments exist! And local councils! It depends what your issue/concern is as to which level of government you should contact. But it's OK! If you're unsure which level is relevant whoever you contact should forward you onto the right person.

A MOTH GOT INTO MY CAMERA LENS AND DIED??? It also scratched up my camera sensor so both the lens and camera I use for filming Auspol Explained videos is in for repair! Thankfully I filmed a couple episodes before the moth appeared so I've got something to edit but it'll be out of action for a while

I just want to say apropros of nothing: court proceedings should never be politicised. The judiciary is an important part of any society and it's not there for popularity contests or culture wars.