A. Berçin Barlas

A. Berçin Barlas

@aysebercinb.bsky.social

Computational Structural Biologist, PhD

45 followers68 following12 posts

A. Berçin Barlas reposted

📢 Very happy to see ARTS-DB 2.0 out in Database! 🧬 A lot of work went into bringing bacterial and fungal target-directed genome mining together with updated BGC predictions and an improved interface. Great to finally share it with the community! 🚀 📄: doi.org/10.1093/data... #TDGM #NPs #SecMet

Nadine Ziemert@nadineziemert.bsky.social

Congrats to @turgutmesut.bsky.social @canerbagci.bsky.social and Semih Erdoğmuş for the update and major improvement of ARTs-DB academic.oup.com/database/art... 🥳 Now also including fungal data and a much improved and more intuitive interface!! happy #targetdirectedgenomemining #secmet

View full thread
View full thread

DynaPIN is designed to be flexible: ✔️ Command-line interface (CLI) for automated workflows ✔️ Python API with Jupyter Notebook integration ✔️ Compatible with MD trajectories (DCD/XTC/TRR), PDB ensembles, AlphaFold models, docking predictions, and experimental structures

Do traditional docking benchmarks reflect actual interface flexibility? Not always. 🟢 Using the DynaBench dataset, we showed that DynaPIN’s dynamic descriptors provide a more biologically meaningful picture of protein interactions than static metrics alone.

Why DynaPIN? 🎯 Unified workflow integrating quality control, residue characterization, and interaction profiling into a single automated run. 🎯 Standardized outputs with machine-readable tables and publication-ready figures.

🎯A key concept behind DynaPIN: Dynamic Interface (DI) Instead of treating interfaces as static, DI residues are identified based on how persistently they remain at the interface throughout a simulation, while their interface layer (core, rim, or support) is characterized over time.

A. Berçin Barlas reposted

A. Berçin Barlas reposted

Only a couple of days left to introduce our brand new tool, DynaPIN that @aysebercinb.bsky.social developed (in collaboration with @sacquin-mo.bsky.social & co.) to analyze dynamic/ensemble protein interfaces!

BioExcel CoE@bioexcelcoe.bsky.social

🎗️ reminder that our #webinar on characterising dynamic #protein interfaces with the DynaPIN #software will take place next week; 🗓️ 31 March 2026, 15:00 CET ✍️ bioexcel.eu/lgmq @ezgikaraca.bsky.social #webinar #ComputerSimulation #protein #molecularmodeling

A. Berçin Barlas reposted

🚀 Excited to announce that our perspective piece with @ezgikaraca.bsky.social and @aysebercinb.bsky.social on AlphaFold distograms is now published in @febsletters.bsky.social!! Here is what we did further 👇

Büşra Savaş@busrasavas.bsky.social

🚨 Super excited for our new preprint on flexibility cues in AlphaFold! Together with @ezgikaraca.bsky.social and @aysebercinb.bsky.social, we found that distograms of AF2.3 and AF3 mirror MD sampling by predicting the extent of a novel conformational change! 🤯 For more👇

A. Berçin Barlas reposted

364 days a year we use AlphaFold to predict protein structure… But not on Christmas Eve! That’s when Santa does the predictions. But beware, computational structural biologists on the naughty list will only get low pLDDTs #SantaFold #bananapro

A. Berçin Barlas reposted

And the legacy continues! 😊 @amjjbonvin.bsky.social @bioinfo.se @lindorfflarsen.bsky.social #EMBOIntegMod25 ! 🍀🧿

Ezgi Karaca@ezgikaraca.bsky.social

The legendary EMBO Integrative Modeling Course is back! If you want to be in this picture in the 2025 edition, just go ahead and register at meetings.embo.org/event/25-bio... Organized by myself & @amjjbonvin.bsky.social & @arneelof.bsky.social & @lindorfflarsen.bsky.social

🚀 Excited to share that our article with @ezgikaraca.bsky.social is now published in Communications Biology! In this study, we explored DNA readout rules of almost identical DNMT3A and DNMT3B (91% sequence similarity!), and we asked: how can nearly the same proteins “see” DNA so differently? 🧬✨

Communications Biology@commsbio.nature.com

Comparative dynamics analysis identifies key residues driving sequence specificity differences between human DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B. @aysebercinb.bsky.social‬ @ezgikaraca.bsky.social‬ www.nature.com/articles/s42...

View full thread

Altogether, ✅ DNMT3A uses a rigid, precise strategy, while DNMT3B is more flexible and adaptable. In other words, ✅ DNMT3A is a specialist with a pre-organized catalytic loop, while DNMT3B is a generalist with a flexible catalytic loop supporting its adaptability.

This is the first systematic dynamic analysis of shape readout in DNMT3 enzymes, showing how small molecular changes can lead to big functional differences --and laying groundwork for engineering paralog-specific protein-DNA interactions. A long journey, but rewarding! 🌱

🚀 Excited to share that our article with @ezgikaraca.bsky.social is now published in Communications Biology! In this study, we explored DNA readout rules of almost identical DNMT3A and DNMT3B (91% sequence similarity!), and we asked: how can nearly the same proteins “see” DNA so differently? 🧬✨

Communications Biology@commsbio.nature.com

Comparative dynamics analysis identifies key residues driving sequence specificity differences between human DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B. @aysebercinb.bsky.social‬ @ezgikaraca.bsky.social‬ www.nature.com/articles/s42...

To answer this, we ran 16 μs MD sims and built a new framework: Comparative Dynamics Analysis (CDA). CDA integrates two complementary perspectives: ➡️ Base readout: base-specific hydrogen bonds at major groove ➡️ Shape readout: DNA deformation, electrostatics, and hydrophobic contacts at minor groove

We found that subtle amino acid substitutions reshape DNA recognition: ⚡ DNMT3A uses Arg836 → rigid hydrogen bonding + electrostatic anchoring, favors pyrimidines (C/T). 🤸‍♀️ DNMT3B replaces Arg836 with Lys777 and introduces Asn779 → flexible and cooperative readout with broader substrate tolerance.

You are up to date.