boja3.bsky.social

I’m not religious per se (though I was raised as such: public school, Hebrew School, Bar Mitzvah, etc.). Plus, studied Old and New Testaments (as literature/narrative) in grad. sch. That said/writ, I am consistently amazed that various religious communities, et al. don’t see Trump/-ists/-ism as >

> and yet I can easily recognize at least the avatar of an Antichrist. How is it that so-called Christians and evangelicals in “his flock” do not? That was rhetorical; I/we know how. You’ve heard of RINOs and DINOs (Repubs./Dems. In Name Only)? These are, at best, CINOs (Christians In Name Only). >

2 July

> Meanwhile, Trump, et al. NEVER were, but that’s a longer conversation. What is clear is that he/they EVER WERE anti-. Anti-Judeo-Christians dressed as Judeo-Christians, and worse, anti-Humanists disguised as humans.

> at all to be funny: Donald Trump, his acolytes and minions, his admin., and of course as here ICE(!), is on display, arresting a nun walking to church, as a literal ANTI-CHRIST. Not in name-calling but in name. This is who he/they are, this is what he/they do. I’ve been “witness” to this for ten >

2 July

years now. Doubtless, so have many of you. Beyond the imbecility, the shameless corruption (ha! “shameless” is in the rearview mirror!), the outright criminality, etc., he/they are ACTUALLY kidnapping people off the streets … and here, now, a NUN. What the actual F-? As above, I’m not a Christian >

> not merely antithetical to normative modern Christian values and text(s), but as THE ANTITHESIS to them. To wit, I just read—have you yet read/seen?—via mainstream news outlets (i.e., not marginal or suspect, though, sure, mainstream is oft suspect for lacking analysis): A NUN—habited, walking >

2 July

to her Church in south Texas (McAllen)—was accosted and detained/arrested by ICE agents, and like any/every, whisked off to a detention center. Long-short, she has since been released after Church officials expressed outrage. Still, to my point here—and pun/irony/satire yes intended but NOT meant >

14 June

I realize not “almost” but anything, everything else is more important than this bullshit, but … Oh-My-What-the-F?!!! In the criminal clown car that has been Trump, Jared/Ivanka, Vance, Miller, Bondi, Noem, and on and on … and on(!), the supposedly “sober” mind (for being vacant and absent) >

> when at the end of Orwell’s parable, the animals peer through a window to see now that their now-“ruling” pigs (Napoleon, et al.), in their pact and conspiracy with the farmer/humans, are indistinguishable. Speaking of “Napoleon”: Do (can?!) we still banish the likes of Trump, his acolytes, and >

14 June

ministers/ministry to Elba or Devil’s Island (the French penal colony), otherwise to adjudicate their utter, UTTER bullshit as ‘non compos mentis’ and thus unfit for duties to serve the body politic!?!!

> President Kennedy announced that we were gonna put a man on the moon and return him safely to the Earth, no one thought that was possible, and we did it. We are a nation founded on doing what no one else dared to do, and no one else aspired to do. And at some level, that’s what this >

14 June

> whole company, what UFC has been.” Trump’s insanity must be a contagion! Like the half-century old staging of “Marat/Sade,” where at the last the camera pans out to reveal the asylum guards and inmates are not on opposite sides (in/out) of the prison bars, but rather side by side; or, likewise, >

> has ostensibly been (Trump’s “Little Marco”) Sec. of State Rubio—who of course is NOT a serious mind (… but just for argument’s sake). Wellll, here’s what Rubio had to say on MS NOW in advance of Trump’s death-cage-match on the White House South Lawn (aka Mad-to-the-Max TrumperDome): “When >

Trump (to Meet the Press’ correspondent Kristen Welker) as he walks out on the interview: "A country can never be great with a dishonest press.” Close! Needs an editor. One too many “s”es. Rather, “A country can never be great with a dishonest Pres.” See, always a kernel of truth in his bullshit.

I really don’t go in for low-hanging-fruit nonsense, but goose-gander here for a sec.: 1) So yer tellin’ me when Comey (anyone) says or writes or takes a pic of seashells articulating/illustrating “8647,” that this suddenly is a murderous threat … when of course it’s not: “86” has ALWAYS meant >

> offend Blacks or women, that’s not gonna cut it. The media’s already gonna say you’re ‘mansplaining’ and you’re being mean. You gotta slit her throat and then just watch her die.” Context doesn’t matter, though, right? Threat’s a threat. Comey (hadn't!) made one, but Watters has!—metaphors >

be damned. Right. In Art(s) and Science(s) and the like, we are a remarkable species. Perhaps not always brilliant, but often so, and again, remarkable! But in Politics (again, often sadly across the board)? No, not so much. To snatch an old phrase from Hunter Thompson: We’re DOOMED!

> former Vice President and presidential candidate Kamala Harris): “… You gotta slit her throat and then just watch her die.” Crickets. No public outcry. Not even crocodile tears. No federal investigation, no (talk of) indictment, etc. In fact, to be "intellectually fair”—though not a phrase >