Charlie Pratt

Charlie Pratt

@charliepratt.com

Dad. Creative Director. Guitar addict. Seeker of peace. https://charliepratt.com

43 followers64 following108 posts

Seems like the richer or more powerful one gets, the more their childlike nature comes to the forefront. MINE! *WAH* *ACT OUT* Toddlers with zero empathy, but with private jets and, from time to time, nuclear codes.

You ever do one of those weird Paul-Rudd-in-I-Love-You-Man brain farts, where you're finishing a call with someone on the phone—like, say, a service provider or something—and instead of saying the normal words you utter some gibberish non-word and everyone pretends nothing happened? Me nethered.

Sometimes, and only sometimes, the inexorable passage of time gives me hope that these times shall pass and the clouds will make way for new light

Kyle Griffin@kylegriffin1.bsky.social

Donald Trump just reposted an AI video depicting President Obama being arrested by FBI agents. Yes, really.

Top 10 TV shows of all time, in no particular order: 1. The West Wing 2. Deadwood 3. The Wire 4. Breaking Bad 5. Better Call Saul 6. Scrubs 7. The Sopranos 8. The Office (UK) 9. Curb Your Enthusiasm 10. Succession

Using AI reduces cognitive load significantly, it seems, which makes sense and is also a real concern/consideration. Genuinely curious followup question: No one seems to be asking whether or not our cognitive loads, in general, at this point in history, are normal, low, or high?

Frankly, I know of no one sitting around staring at the walls and gathering dust because they use AI. Most of the folks I know that are using AI are some of the most curious and high-thinking people I know. I suppose, like with most things, it all depends.

With AI, as with everything else it seems, there are only two camps of thought: 1) AI is the way of the future, we must embrace it, and 2) AI is the harbinger of doom, we must fear it. If I could improve humanity in one single way it would be to stop carving every topic up into two opposing camps.

I will always love working on the details of interactions within a UI. Years later, it's still surprising how difficult it is to make something feel both simple and clear. #ui #ux #design

Dear @figma.com - please let us turn Comments on or off as a default behavior when opening a file. Every file I open, my first step is to turn them off. As a result, I start every project with an eye roll and a pointless key command.

Wouldn't mind having a time machine, so I could bring George Washington to 2025 and try to explain to him what "the President of the United States is running his own crypto scam" means.

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame, With conquering limbs astride from land to land; Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name Mother of Exiles.

From her beacon-hand Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame. “Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she With silent lips.

“Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!” "The New Colossus" — Emma Lazarus, circa 1883 🗽

Streaming music platform model idea. Users select artists a la carte. Standard price is set to have access to their catalogs. Price is set by analyzing current value of an artist's revenue from record sales over time. I.e., older, more successful artists are more expensive than indie acts.

View full thread

Audio quality goes up to lossless. Platform pricing is usage based, meaning some months you might only pay $8 for the platform, where other months with higher usage you might pay $12. Light usage: $6–8 Moderate: $9–12 Heavy: $13–15+ Add on "Discovery tier" can be added to temporarily add artists.

I've had it with the "content tsunami" models like Spotify, Netflix, etc. I know it's bad for me, and bad for most artists. There needs to be an option to allow users to build the music library they want, instead of being forced to eat the world.

Streaming music platform model idea. Users select artists a la carte. Standard price is set to have access to their catalogs. Price is set by analyzing current value of an artist's revenue from record sales over time. I.e., older, more successful artists are more expensive than indie acts.

Each year (or on some periodic cycles), users can see a review of what they played, and like Premier League relegation, can choose to jettison arists they just aren't listening to. Perhaps a one-year-only lower price is then presented to keep the user paying the artist. User can accept or decline.

One of the biggest challenges we face, in my opinion, is in the way we view and treat each other as individuals. It's disheartening to see how few people I speak with about political and social issues can parse the difference between a party and a person. Words and phrases matter. A lot.

View full thread

Everything in the news and media is screaming at us. Everything, it appears is consequential to the max. And the headlines update moment to moment. THIS IS HAPPENING. NOW THIS. NOW THAT. It never, ever ends. We have to reintroduce ourselves to the healing power of one-on-one conversations.

Two participants who can, for a few minutes anyway, put their pistols down and afford each other the opportunity not to be a: MAGA Libtard Snowflake Woke NPC Bootlicker Soy Boy Fascist Commie Grifter Even if just for a little while.

One of the biggest challenges we face, in my opinion, is in the way we view and treat each other as individuals. It's disheartening to see how few people I speak with about political and social issues can parse the difference between a party and a person. Words and phrases matter. A lot.

View full thread

By using sweeping generalizations, we create an instant, real-time, polarized crossroads moment for the the listener. If they agree with our rant, then they simply reinforce the generalization and entrench themselves. If they disagree, they're now on defense, fighting for a basic sense of worth.

Tragically, these dynamics have little to do with the merits of the arguments or the details of the matter at hand. The substance of the argument becomes nothing more than decor, and the whole thing devolves into a war of words. Tribalism takes the wheel. Fear and loathing for the win.

One of the biggest challenges we face, in my opinion, is in the way we view and treat each other as individuals. It's disheartening to see how few people I speak with about political and social issues can parse the difference between a party and a person. Words and phrases matter. A lot.

If someone is upset about something in the world, and in anger they casually say things like "they all {do a thing}" or "they're all {pejorative}|," it leaves no room for discussion with someone who sees things differently. This cuts off the opportunity for empathy or understanding at the knees.

Watching Ken Burns “The U.S. and the Holocaust.” I can’t help but notice ripples and echoes in our current public discourse, not at all dissimilar from some of the foulest ideas put forward then, as a way to make us afraid of our neighbors and to justify our basest instincts.

Note to #AI devs: It's a good idea to have an honest chat with your prompt overlords about how likely it is that it can actually do the thing you want. Here's Replit keeping it real: