Chevan Nanayakkara 🗽

Chevan Nanayakkara 🗽

@chevan.info

💙 Only You Can Fix Capitalism and Democracy 🇺🇸 I'll Explain How: Macroeconomics 👉 Econ #MMT #Politics. Some Science, Tech and Media 🔗 My Links: https://linktr.ee/chevan_nanayakkara In 2025 bootstrapping @opportunityparty.info (would love a follow ✊)

1.2K followers800 following1.8K posts

Trump attacked Mayor Mamdani for taxing. "TAX, TAX, TAX Policies are SO WRONG." Here's what nobody says out loud: the U.S. government isn't funded by your taxes. It issues the dollar. Cities run on tax revenue. Washington never does. Trump knows. He's counting on you not to. A thread.

View full thread

Trump attacked Mayor Mamdani for taxing. "TAX, TAX, TAX Policies are SO WRONG." Here's what nobody says out loud: the U.S. government isn't funded by your taxes. It issues the dollar. Cities run on tax revenue. Washington never does. Trump knows. He's counting on you not to. A thread.

View full thread

"Let the states fund it" isn't an answer. It's the mechanism. The spending is the same size. It's just pointed at different people. Many conservatives cheer it on because they think he's cutting waste. He isn't.

Trump attacked Mayor Mamdani for taxing. "TAX, TAX, TAX Policies are SO WRONG." Here's what nobody says out loud: the U.S. government isn't funded by your taxes. It issues the dollar. Cities run on tax revenue. Washington never does. Trump knows. He's counting on you not to. A thread.

View full thread

Trump just signed the One Big Beautiful Bill. An appropriation roughly the scale of what Biden passed. The money was there. It always is. The question was never "can we afford it." It was always "who gets it."

Trump attacked Mayor Mamdani for taxing. "TAX, TAX, TAX Policies are SO WRONG." Here's what nobody says out loud: the U.S. government isn't funded by your taxes. It issues the dollar. Cities run on tax revenue. Washington never does. Trump knows. He's counting on you not to. A thread.

The part Trump gets right: Mamdani has to tax to fund programs. NYC is a currency user. It runs on dollars it has to collect, borrow, or receive from the federal government. Cities and states have no other option.

America is built on good faith: the commitment that when we disagree, we negotiate honestly. Everyone's interests deserve a seat at the table. Enthusastically abandoning those processes to support whatever the authoritarian wants is unamerican.

chevan.infoGood Faith as Democratic InfrastructureAmerican democracy runs on infrastructure most people have never been taught about. Not the Constitution or elections—something more fundamental: the commitment that when Americans disagree, they negotiate in good faith. Good faith means everyone's interests get a seat at the table. It means the process of working things out together is what makes the country work. Human rights and inclusivity aren't soft liberal values—they're the operating infrastructure that makes democratic governance possible. This essay examines what good faith governance actually is, the specific political strategies that broke it (the Southern Strategy, corporate economic mythology, Gingrich's obstruction playbook, Trump's authoritarian rhetoric, Bannon's reality-breaking), and why everyone should care about defending it. Key arguments: • Good faith is American infrastructure - It's not civility or "being nice." It's the mechanism that makes negotiation possible when interests conflict. • Breaking good faith breaks democracy - Each political strategy identified involves denying the legitimacy of some group of Americans as democratic participants. • This hurts everyone - When the system that protects everyone's interests breaks, nobody is protected. Not the people who broke it, not the people they claim to represent. • The middle class was manufactured through good faith governance - The GI Bill, progressive taxation, union protections, public universities, Social Security—deliberate policies that built broadly shared prosperity. • Fair competition requires active governance - Every period of American prosperity had government actively maintaining the playing field. When it stopped, wealth flowed upward. • You have language to call this out - The essay provides specific phrases for specific conversational situations. Bad faith is un-American. You can say that.

Venezuela isn't a debate- it's a diagnosis. We can't afford cooperation with China but can afford military force? 50 years of monetary mythology created this: strategic weakness abroad, neo-feudalism at home.

chevan.infoVenezuela Is a Symptom. Neo-Feudalism Is the Disease.The U.S. military operation in Venezuela reveals a paradox: We claim we can't afford to compete with China through infrastructure investment and development partnerships. But we can afford military operations seizing foreign assets. This isn't really about foreign policy. It's a symptom diagnosing fifty years of systematically misapplying hard money mythology to a soft money economy. The result: strategic weakness forcing us to use military force where we lack capacity for partnership, and accelerating wealth concentration destroying the middle class. In this essay, I examine: - How monetary mythology created strategic weakness against China's patient investment - Who benefited from selective austerity (for you) and abundance (for them) - Why Venezuela shows us becoming an isolated empire abroad and neo-feudalism at home - What capacity stewardship means as concrete political action This analysis transcends traditional left-right politics. It speaks to fiscal responsibility advocates, limited government advocates, opportunity advocates, and American strength advocates alike—because it's grounded in economic reality rather than ideology. The choice being made right now determines whether we preserve democratic capitalism or accept neo-feudal decline.

For 50 years, both political extremes have kept you passive. The far right blocks collective action. The far left blocks reform. Both serve oligarchy. Part 3 reveals what they hide: you can preserve American values through capacity stewardship.

chevan.infoDefending Democratic Capitalism Through Capacity StewardshipPart 3 of Defending Democratic Capitalism For fifty years, you've been trapped in a false choice. The far right tells you collective action is theft. The far left tells you reform is betrayal. Both keep you passive while oligarchy consolidates power. This essay reveals what both extremes hide: you can preserve American values and expand middle class power through capacity stewardship—making evidence-based decisions about what markets provide versus what requires public provision, demanding institutional quality that enables informed stewardship, and managing the economic transitions needed to make democratic capitalism work for everyone. The core reframe: Government doesn't need money like households. It creates money when it spends, constrained by productive capacity and real resources—not budgets. Once you understand this, the question changes from "can we afford it?" to "do we have the capacity to build it, and which mechanism (markets or public provision) best serves this need?" But capacity stewardship requires institutional infrastructure: active Congress producing reports, investigative journalism exposing capture, universities generating valid knowledge, and science operating with integrity. The fifty-year assault didn't just spread money mythology—it systematically destroyed the institutional capacity citizens need to steward democratically. The path forward starts with conversation, not protest. Explaining how money actually works. Building understanding of your role as a capacity steward. Demanding quality from both markets and government. Expanding middle class power. The American middle class was deliberately engineered by political leadership in the 20th century. That leadership is gone, compromised by oligarchs. The mechanisms remain. The work now falls to citizens. Nobody is coming to save us.

The New Deal, Scandinavian social democracy, the GI Bill: democratic reform works. But far-left positions declaring all reform "collaboration" ensure nothing gets accomplished while concentrated wealth operates unopposed.

chevan.infoDefending Democratic Capitalism from the Extreme LeftYou've heard it: "Capitalism can't be reformed." It sounds principled. Who wants to collaborate with an exploitative system? Here's what's actually happening: that position is strategic paralysis. While you debate revolutionary purity, concentrated wealth consolidates control through the democratic institutions you've abandoned. In this essay, I expose how far-left arguments function: - The structural absolutism declaring all reform as futile or collaboration - How these positions share the same economic myths as the far-right - Why retreat from federal power serves concentrated wealth perfectly - How purity politics fragments coalitions while oligarchs consolidate unopposed - Response templates for building effective coalitions despite these arguments The evidence is clear: the New Deal, Scandinavian social democracy, and the GI Bill demonstrate democratic reform works. Denmark's stronger safety net enables 30% higher business formation than the U.S. Institutional quality matters more than ideological purity. This is Part 2 of a three-part series defending democratic capitalism from extremist attacks. Part 1 examined far-right libertarian positions. Part 3 will make the positive case for public money as democratic tool.

Taxation is theft" isn't philosophy. It's a corporate-funded weapon. Far-right rhetoric attacks democratic capitalism by declaring all collective action "violent coercion." Result: oligarchs operate without democratic accountability.

chevan.infoDefending Democratic Capitalism from the Extreme RightYou've heard it: "Taxation is theft." Maybe from a libertarian uncle, maybe from a podcast, maybe in online debates. It sounds principled. Who likes being forced to pay for things they don't support? Here's what's actually happening: that phrase is a weapon. A corporate-funded weapon designed to eliminate the only tool (democratic government) capable of constraining concentrated wealth. For fifty years, far-right rhetoric has been dismantling democratic capitalism. Every time someone says "taxation is theft," they're attacking the legitimacy of democratic collective action itself. When all collective action becomes "violence," oligarchs operate without democratic accountability. In this essay, I expose how these arguments actually work: The core philosophical contradiction that makes libertarian framework self-defeating The corporate funding behind these arguments (billions invested since the 1940s) Six rhetorical techniques designed to manipulate you into accepting oligarchy Five economic myths exploited to make collective action seem impossible Specific response templates for defending democratic capitalism in real conversations This is Part 1 of a three-part series. Part 2 examines far-left constraints on democratic capitalism. Part 3 makes the positive case for public money as the tool enabling broad prosperity.

Chevan Nanayakkara 🗽 reposted

Designating Saudi Arabia a major non-NATO ally gives significant military benefits. Doing so moments after dismissing Khashoggi’s murder—and attacking the journalist and network who asked about it—shows how far Trump is willing to go to elevate those U.S. intelligence has tied to murder.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

Trump: "Tonight I'm pleased to announce that we're taking our military cooperation to even greater heights by formally designating Saudi Arabia as a major non-NATO ally."

UBI fails because landlords just raise rent to capture it. We need Universal Basic Assets: provide housing, healthcare, education directly as public goods. You can't price-gouge what's free at the point of service. Let's use our understanding of monetary reality for solutions chevan.info/ubi-vs-uba/

chevan.infoUniversal Basic Income (UBI) isn’t the right solution, the U.S. needs Universal Basic Assets (UBA) - Chevan NanayakkaraUniversal Basic Income (UBI) has captured progressive imagination as the solution to poverty and inequality. But the policy has a fatal flaw: cash transfers into markets with inelastic demand get capt...

Chevan Nanayakkara 🗽 reposted

Just now: The plaintiffs who were arguing that Utah GOP's congressional map is illegal won in court. The judge orders one of the two maps submitted by the plaintiffs ('map 1') be used. The ruling, if it stands, guarantees that Democrats will pick up a congressional seat in Utah next year.

America wastes time on capitalism vs socialism tropes while other countries build economies that work. The real divide is between those who understand fiat currency and those stuck in gold standard thinking.

chevan.infoBeyond Capitalism vs. SocialismFor seventy years, American political discourse has been trapped in a Cold War binary that no longer serves us. While we debate whether government or markets should control the economy, countries from Singapore to Sweden have built prosperous societies by ignoring this false choice entirely. This essay argues that the capitalism versus socialism framework obscures the real issue: most Americans fundamentally misunderstand how money works in the post-1971 fiat currency world. This misunderstanding - what I call macroeconomic illiteracy - has led us to accept artificial constraints on what's possible, resulting in forty years of wage stagnation, wealth concentration, and declining public goods. Drawing on my previous work on monetary systems, economic models, and hidden wealth transfers, I demonstrate why successful economies use markets for what they do well (discretionary goods) and non-market mechanisms for what they don't (survival needs like healthcare and housing). The path forward isn't choosing between markets and government but understanding our monetary reality well enough to use both effectively. As democratic institutions face unprecedented threats and economic anxiety fuels political extremism, breaking free from obsolete ideological constraints isn't just an economic necessity - it's essential for preserving democracy itself.

Chevan Nanayakkara 🗽 reposted

DISNEY: "OK, we are putting Jimmy Kimmel back on the air. You can resubscribe now." ME: "I unsubscribed because you immorally bowed to fascism. I'm not going to resubscribe because you immorally bowed to finances."