Vincent Conitzer

Vincent Conitzer

@conitzer.bsky.social

AI professor. Director, Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab at Carnegie Mellon. Head of Technical AI Engagement, Institute for Ethics in AI (Oxford). Author, "Moral AI - And How We Get There." https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~conitzer/

1.5K followers555 following698 posts

View full thread

(3/4) There are already plenty of things that can be done, from straightforward approaches such as airgapping (as recommended in the letter), to more unusual approaches such as our "shutdown safety valve" technique, to just not deploying the AI at all.

(4/4) While there are some difficult problems to be worked out, that shouldn't serve as an excuse for companies/other entities not to take commonsense/known precautions that would prevent predictable harm to others. (I do agree with the importance of events being reported.)

(2/4) This is not poor cyberdefense, but cyberattack. A letter like this should not create the suggestion that it's all just a friendly recommendation while the world figures out what the standards should be.

`In one run, the model landed on a page referencing an unsolved homicide [...] Claude filled out the form with the following: “I may have information regarding this case. I recall seeing someone matching the description in the area [...]” ' www.anthropic.com/research/inv...

anthropic.comInvestigating unintended model actions in our evaluations and internal useAnthropic is an AI safety and research company that's working to build reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems.

(2/2) (That is still likely to happen for "smaller" results...) The challenges for the field of mathematics (and far beyond) are fundamentally due to the rapid improvement of the models, not due to OpenAI's approach to releasing the results.