David Sloan

David Sloan

@davesmaths.bsky.social

Chief Scientific Officer of the Foundational Questions Institute. Reader in Physics at Lancaster University. Friend to dogs. (He/Him) Trans rights are human rights, Black lives matter, Palestinians are human beings. The unfollow button is up there ⬆

138 followers160 following278 posts

I can confirm from when I was a postdoc in Oxford the glass walls to our offices were regularly covered in whiteboard marker.

John C. Baez@johncarlosbaez.bsky.social

I thought mathematicians only wrote on windows in movies - A Beautiful Mind, The Man Who Knew Infinity - but it turns out they do it for real here in Edinburgh!

And again - our postdocs are awesome.

FQxI@fqxi.org

Lucy James, one of FQxI’s new Foundational Fellows, is working on two of the fellowship’s projects, the arrow of time and multiverses. 🧪 ⚛️ Video by @gabefitz.bsky.social Paintings and prints: The Met, Rijksmuseum, Wellcome Collection (public domain)

David Sloan reposted

Lucy James, one of FQxI’s new Foundational Fellows, is working on two of the fellowship’s projects, the arrow of time and multiverses. 🧪 ⚛️ Video by @gabefitz.bsky.social Paintings and prints: The Met, Rijksmuseum, Wellcome Collection (public domain)

Our postdocs (Foundational Fellows) are fantastic.

FQxI@fqxi.org

@high-fae.bsky.social, one of FQxI’s new Foundational Fellows, explains a maths/logic puzzle. 🧪 🎞️ by @gabefitz.bsky.social #maths #puzzle #science

Highly relevant across academia. Every time they need a quote journalists just go to the same people, usually those with sufficient privilege to be completely insulated from whatever's going on.

Izabella Laba 🇨🇦@ijlaba.bsky.social

Short thread asking @nytimes.com and other MSM to stop interviewing the same small handful of people every time something math-related comes up. Mathematicians are dismayed when AI scoops them on the results? How about look for advice from someone familiar with getting scooped and outpowered.

Talking disruption in science with @fqxi.org and @gabefitz.bsky.social - nice write-up on qspace.fqxi.org.

qspace.fqxi.orgFQxI - Foundational Questions InstituteThe Foundational Questions Institute, FQxI, catalyzes, supports, and disseminates research on questions at the foundations of science, particularly new frontiers and innovative ideas integral to a dee...
FQxI@fqxi.org

Is science getting less disruptive? On the FQxI podcast in 2023, @davesmaths.bsky.social explained why a truly new idea can take years or even decades to come together, and why that’s a problem when early-career researchers are pushed to publish fast. 🧪 ⚛️

The entitlement of an industry that exists to profit by extracting money from our work without any compensation is astounding.

Jasmine Fledderjohann@jfledderjohann.bsky.social

Journals are a scam (we all know it). While authors & reviewers provide free labour, journals charge exorbitant rates for open access/hide behind paywalls. They should at least be respectful of our time when requesting our free labour. We need a better system. #AbolishJournals #JournalShame

Note that there are admirable small, volunteer run, non-profit journals out there that deserve our love and support. This is about the behemoths with profit margins in the billions who somehow act like they are doing us a favour in asking for free work.

I once got sent a large, engraved, heavy (multiple kg) stone to my work address. With instructions that I was to pass it on to Beyonce. Before anyone asks, no. Not even remotely. Though I'm sure she'd be agree about the role of scale in physics and thus be a fan of dynamical similarity.

Katie Mack@astrokatie.com

Apparently there are some people still unaware of this, but: e-mailing a stranger to ask them to pass on a message to a more famous person they have worked with is *astonishingly* rude. (It’s also usually pretty rude, in a different way, to do that to a friend! Tread carefully!)

First hit's free...

Anthony Strand@durwoodclapper.bsky.social

Scholastic sent me a whole box of paperback copies of Sorcerer’s Stone that I sure didn't order. When I asked why, my rep told me they're sending complimentary giveaway copies to random schools that do Book Fair.

Yes, I know THE and Times aren't technically the same thing, but if two orderings disagree so wildly with one another, how can we trust any of them?

David Sloan@davesmaths.bsky.social

Oxford University is the best in the world (Times Higher Education World Rankings 2027) yet 5th best in the UK (Times University Guide 2027). St Andrews at no.1 in the UK and ranks it 185th in the world. Behind 23 other UK institutions.

Oxford University is the best in the world (Times Higher Education World Rankings 2027) yet 5th best in the UK (Times University Guide 2027). St Andrews at no.1 in the UK and ranks it 185th in the world. Behind 23 other UK institutions.

A partial order on a subset obeys the partial order on the parent set. Hence we must be forced to conclude that this university ordering is mathematically ill defined and therefore worthless.

If you've never heard a fire alarm at work it isn't because there haven't been any fires. It's because your institution didn't install smoke detectors.

Nicole Bedera@nbedera.bsky.social

While we’re talking about campus sexual violence, I want to revisit the recent history of a topic where we have seen some of the biggest backslides: Expelling rapists from school.

From their own article "St Andrews, ranked second in the Guardian’s university league table for 2026, accepts one of the highest percentages in the UK of privately educated students. " St Andrews was just ranked top of the Times UK university rankings.

David Sloan@davesmaths.bsky.social

Newspaper publishes "University Guide" that correlates high scores with middle/upper class students. Newspaper is then shocked to find classism rampant at one of its top ranked institutions. www.theguardian.com/education/20...

Very much this. I don't teach my students so they know physics, I teach them so they can think like a physicist*. * An idealized physicist. In a vacuum. I know how some of my colleagues actually think...

This post is unavailable.

I'm patiently waiting for the deluge of "All the jobs have been given to less qualified applicants who only got the position because they are sexual harassers" complaints. Bets on whether they get here before Godot?

This post is unavailable.

David Sloan reposted

Science needs people who can afford to be wrong. Yet we seem to have built a career ladder that removes them. [VISUAL THREAD]

An excellent volume, with work by great researchers at the interface of physics and philosophy. And some weird guy who kept going on about cosmology.

Michael Cuffaro@cuffaromichael.bsky.social

@stephanhartmann.bsky.social and I are happy to announce that our book, Open Systems: Physics, Metaphysics, and Methodology (global.oup.com/academic/pro...), is finally published. Written for scholars and students in philosophy and physics, as well as anyone interested in the foundations of science.

David Sloan reposted

Jordan Scharnhorst is one of our new FQxI Fellows. He’s joining us for Foundational Answers, a programme taking stock of progress on 10 major topics in foundational science and identifying the questions still open. A part of that work is adversarial collaboration. Jordan explains what that means.

Absolutely - looking historically emphasises both the need for repeated experiments and tests of independent predictions of the theory.

Sylvia Wenmackers@sylviawenmackers.be

Despite the victory that was immediately declared & still resonates, the evidence at the time was in fact inconclusive! Earman&Glymour: "If one kept the data from all three instruments, the best estimate of the deflection would have to be somewhere between the Newtonian value and the Einstein value"

Total eclipse today - the 1919 eclipse was the first big demonstration of gravitational lensing, with GR getting the "right" amount of lensing, beating the Newtonian prediction. If, like me, you thought the Newtonian prediction should be zero, well, read on...

View full thread

To get the Newtonian deflection, set up axes so that the light is initially travelling along the x axis, with closest distance of this straight line to the sun being aligned with the y axis. Then integrate the total Newton force along this path to get the change in y momentum.

To get the Einstein deflection, you have to find the geodesics of the Schwarzschild metric for a null geodesic. It's easiest to do this on a plane using radial coordinate u=1/r and angular coordinate phi, finding paths where u->0 (r-> infinity).

Total eclipse today - the 1919 eclipse was the first big demonstration of gravitational lensing, with GR getting the "right" amount of lensing, beating the Newtonian prediction. If, like me, you thought the Newtonian prediction should be zero, well, read on...

The physics is a little more subtle than on first glance, as negligible (but non-zero) mass photons travelling at a finite speed would also be lensed by Newton's theory but not as much. In doing the calculation right, up to some approximations of large distances, GR gives twice the deflection.

To be fair it has appeared on the Guardian's website: www.theguardian.com/education/20... “In one example the person being complained about drafted the response to the claimant rejecting his complaints against them.” How could this ever be considered a good idea?

theguardian.comUniversity of Cambridge whistleblower who reported alleged bullying wins employment tribunalProf Wyn Evans, who raised concerns over treatment of female staff at Institute of Astronomy, was subject to ‘baseless’ investigation, judge rules
David Sloan@davesmaths.bsky.social

Wonder if this will get the same level of media attention that other Cambridge news always seems to get.

Wonder if this will get the same level of media attention that other Cambridge news always seems to get.

21 Group@21group.bsky.social

Breaking news Cambridge University loses the whistleblowing tribunal Vice Chancellor Deborah Prentice is among the respondents found to have retaliated against a whistleblower Never rains but it pours 21percent.org?p=4148

David Sloan reposted

Some physicists believe that the future can influence the past. For someone hearing that for the first time... it sounds pretty crazy. We spoke briefly to Matthew Leifer about how that can possibly be true!

"You've been poisoned. Would you like one dose of antidote or to play the roulette wheel for 100 doses?"

SMBC Comics@smbccomics.bsky.social

Ironically less crazy than that thing SBF said to Tyler Cowen. COMIC ◆ www.smbc-comics.com/comic/ev-2 PATREON ◆ www.patreon.com/ZachWeinersm... STORE ◆ smbc-store.myshopify.com

David Sloan reposted

🍸 Three #FlashFinding cocktail punches on #FoodSecurity in post-COVID India. Fast, evidence-based insights on how households coped & what this means for food systems and policy. 📽️ ✔️ youtube.com/shorts/Liq1U... ✔️ youtube.com/shorts/CSvdJ... ✔️ youtube.com/shorts/wL2hT... #Nutrition #India #COVID19

youtube.comCovid-19 and Food Insecurity - Flash Finding#1 🍽️YouTube video by Food Security for Equitable Futures

David Sloan reposted

A corridor chat with Chris Smeenk, professor at @westernu.ca, about correcting common misunderstandings about the Big Bang and the early universe. Chris' research centres around the scientific method and the nature of our knowledge of physics.

Makes more sense if you read it in the voice of Zapp Brannigan.

Katie Mack@astrokatie.com

NASA isn’t on Bluesky but they are on Threads and they put out a statement about the selection of an all-male #Artemis III crew.

And it happens again - original email 9:12 PM on Friday, harassing follow-up 9:12PM on Sunday. You won't believe how fast I declined that one. Journal editors: if you do this, you contribute to a culture of overwork and poor mental health, and I will NOT sacrifice that for you.

David Sloan@davesmaths.bsky.social

If you're an editor for a journal I've never heard of and you ask me to review a paper, don't send a pushy "reminder" less than 48 hours later. Doubly so if a good fraction of that time is outside of normal working hours (weekend). If you do, I'll almost certainly refuse to review for you.

I'm all in favour of not allowing LLM generated content. Given the central role that arXiv plays in modern physics communication they had better be sure that they are right, and have genunine transparency in their moderation process. A false positive could be devastating to a PhD student's career.

anil oza@aniloza.bsky.social

wow — the preprint host, arxiv, is banning authors for a year if they submit papers with hallucinated citations 🤖

Getting ready to teach: Lecture written PDF on flashdrive Double-checked it's available online to the students Got my notes Grabbed my laptop Jacket on, leave house, get in car Realize I'm still wearing slippers. It might be a rough one today.