David Pfau

David Pfau

@davidpfau.com

So far I have not found the science, but the numbers keep on circling me. Views my own, unfortunately.

10.2K followers548 following961 posts

Elon also tried stack ranking researchers at OpenAI, and if he'd had his way he would have fired the guy who ended up inventing GPT.

An academic colleague just told me his students aren't using LLMs because he can't afford even the low tier monthly subscription for everyone. I'm not sure the folks making $Xm/yr at frontier labs understand just how much of a bubble they're in.

An academic collaborator just told me his students aren't using LLMs because he can't afford even the low tier monthly subscription for everyone. I'm not sure the folks making $Xm/yr at frontier labs understand just how much of a bubble they're in.

We spent $100m building a robot that can pirouette at 5000 rpm and performs Swan Lake beginning to end in 30 seconds. Ballet is solved.

Ok, it's time to coin a law of social media discourse: when something happens that is legitimately worth getting angry about, social media will drive people to get angry about it for the wrong reason.

Prime example I can think of is all the discourse around data centers and water usage, but I see echoes of it in people getting upset at OpenAI because they "stole mathematician's ideas" (probably not) and not because they're destroying the soul of mathematics.

Are people on here aware that on The Other Site all the remaining left wing people are talking about "Woke 1" as some wild thing that is very definitively in the past? Has that discourse made it over here at all, or does everyone here believe Woke is still alive and well?

To be fair they are mostly talking about it in a sort of "ok now that we can honestly look back and discuss some of the problems, let's figure out what we can do better for Woke 2" sort of way.

Using AI to cure cancer or fight climate change makes as much sense as using neuroscience to figure out AI. It's all yak shaving. If your goal is to "solve X" just go solve X, don't try to solve Y then use Y to solve X.

David Pfau reposted

This is an awesome discovery: A single-celled organism with no brain called Stentor seems capable of Pavlovian learning. Yes, it can actually learn to associate two things despite having no neurons. My latest for @newscientist.com. 🧪 #science #memory #learning www.newscientist.com/article/2519...

newscientist.comSingle-celled organism with no brain is capable of Pavlovian learningA trumpet-shaped, single-celled organism seems able to predict one thing will follow another, hinting that such associative learning emerged long before multicellular nervous systems

"Alexander (Smbat) Abian (January 1, 1923 – July 24, 1999)[1] was an Iranian-born Armenian-American mathematician who taught for over 25 years at Iowa State University and became notable for his frequent posts to various Usenet newsgroups, and his advocacy for the destruction of the Moon."

I'm not really sure how to square this with the US spending 1% of GDP on datacenter construction.

Joey Politano🏳️‍🌈@josephpolitano.bsky.social

The US is losing blue-collar jobs for the first time since the early pandemic—year-on-year job losses have hit 145k as manufacturing, transportation, & mining industries lose jobs at a rapid pace while growth in construction has nearly zeroed out

If anyone DMed me recently - to use DMs for this app in the UK, I have to go through age verification, which I have not done yet on principle. If you are trying to reach me privately, email or Twitter DM works.

This requires the calculation of multiple degenerate ground states. People have used neural networks to calculate *a* ground state for the FQHE, and have calculated fractional spin statistics in lattice models, but no one has done these calculations in the continuum before.

All-around fantastic work from Andres Perez Fadon and collaborators, and this shows how these calculations could be done for systems where we still don't know how to write down even qualitatively correct solutions.

This behavior was so weird and unexpected that it ended up being the subject of the 1998 Nobel Prize in physics. No one even knew how to write down a wavefunction that explained this phenomenon until Bob Laughlin just dreamed one up one day. www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physi...

nobelprize.orgNobel Prize in Physics 1998The Nobel Prize in Physics 1998 was awarded jointly to Robert B. Laughlin, Horst L. Störmer and Daniel C. Tsui "for their discovery of a new form of quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations...

Rather than write down a solution through a stroke of genius, we trained a Transformer-like neural network to calculate these fractional spin statistics using "entanglement interferometry", and got answers more accurate than the Laughlin wavefunction.

Fundamental particles are either fermions or bosons. Fermions, like electrons, make up matter, while bosons, like photons, are force carriers. But in two dimensional materials in a magnetic field, things can start to get weird...

The collective excitations of many electrons behave a lot like particles...but instead of particles with integer spin (bosons) or half-integer spins (fermions) they behave like they have weird fractional spins like 1/3, 1/5, etc. This is the *fractional quantum hall effect*.

The first recorded case of COVID-19 was on November 30, 2019. ChatGPT launched to the public on November 30, 2022. What new horror was unleashed on the world yesterday?

Until one day recently, I dropped the notes into an LLM and...got the raw LaTeX right back out. In theory I could have done it myself in a few hours, but this was enough to get me over the "activation energy" to finally do it. So thank you, Frank and Gemini! (Please don't hate me, Bluesky)

But then a weird thing happened...people found it anyway, and actually started citing it like it was a novel result! I guess I accidentally made the top Google result for "Bregman bias-variance" or something.

So I reached out to Frank Nielsen, who helpfully pointed me to the relevant literature. I meant to set the record straight, but by this point I'd actually lost the original LaTeX for the notes, and just never had the time to rewrite them...

This was actually a note I wrote way back in grad school, but never published or even posted to arXiv. After proving the result, I couldn't find a prior reference, but it seemed so basic that I figured it must have been done already. So I posted it on my website and moved on.

Trump's approval rating is now roughly comparable to what it was in mid-2020, at the height of COVID unemployment and George Floyd protests.

I think that we should all strive to live our lives in such a way that, when we die, our greatest accomplishments are not overshadowed by constant bickering about exactly how racist or sexist we were.

I think every one of my ML colleagues from a decade ago who stayed in academia and avoided the AGI/LLM race is now doing "AI for science". Really feels like those are the only two options left.