Jason Hickel

Jason Hickel

@jasonhickel.bsky.social

Professor at ICREA, ICTA, and the Department of Political Science & Public Law at UAB • Author of THE DIVIDE and LESS IS MORE • Global inequality, political economy and ecological economics

36.7K followers115 following1.1K posts

Pinned

New research highlights from 2025! This thread covers some of our latest work on capitalism, imperialism, post-growth and ecosocialist futures. It's all open access, and free PDFs are available via the link at the end of the thread. 🧵

Jason Hickel reposted

⏯️👨‍💻When Both Parties Serve the Rich, What are You Voting For? Our researcher @jasonhickel.bsky.social & Myriam François challenge the logic of endless economic growth & ask what it would take to build an economy that serves people and the planet, rather than ultra-rich znetwork.org/zvideo/when-...

znetwork.orgWhen Both Parties Serve the Rich, What are You Voting For?Is capitalism destroying democracy — and why can’t we seem to stop it? As billionaire wealth soars to record highs and public trust in capitalism

During the big waves of privatisation in the 1980s and 1990s, the debate was framed around who can manage production more efficiently, the state or capital. Everyone bought into this frame and we forgot the more important question, which is who gets to decide what is produced, and for whose benefit.

View full thread

Meanwhile, as both figures show, China provides a net-transfer of embodied energy and labour to Africa’s CFA zone, representing a degree of reciprocity that is generally not evident in the case of the core.

Western narratives about China being the main exploiter of Africa are not supported by evidence from the CFA zone. Of course, to draw stronger conclusions we want to know how trends have evolved over time, to more recent years, and for the rest of Africa - that's done and will be published soon!

Who is draining Africa? This figure shows net-appropriation of resources from Africa's CFA zone, illustrating two key facts. 1) Eurozone countries are the biggest appropriators, benefitting from the Francafrique system. 2) Contrary to conventional Western narratives, China's appropriation is tiny.

View full thread

The model we used provides data only through 2015. In a forthcoming paper we assess trends through 2023, looking not only at per capita but also absolute flows, exchange ratios, price levels etc.

Who is draining Africa? This figure shows net-appropriation of resources from Africa's CFA zone, illustrating two key facts. 1) Eurozone countries are the biggest appropriators, benefitting from the Francafrique system. 2) Contrary to conventional Western narratives, China's appropriation is tiny.

Jason Hickel reposted

Interesting research on neo-colonialism in Africa. Turns out the Eurozone is a much worse offender (by an enormous margin) than China. @70sbachchan.bsky.social and @katemac.bsky.social might be interested.

Jason Hickel@jasonhickel.bsky.social

I'm happy to announce this new paper we have, exploring unequal exchange between France and the African CFA zone. Here's a few key points 🧵, and a free PDF at the end. www.tandfonline.com/eprint/RABZF...

At least for the CFA zone, this finding challenges the dominant narrative that China has a uniquely exploitative relationship with Africa. In fact, it is the Eurozone countries that are the main appropriators from this region, while it enjoys more beneficial terms of trade with China.

Interestingly, we found that other core Eurozone economies also appropriated large quantities from the CFA zone, much more than non-Eurozone core economies like the USA or UK, apparently benefitting from the Françafrique monetary system pegged to the Euro. Here's the figure for embodied land:

But perhaps the most interesting result has to do with China. In the figure above, you'll see that China's per capita appropriation of land is a tiny fraction of what the Eurozone countries net-appropriate (less than 1% that of France). The same pattern holds across the board, as we can see below.

We found clear patterns of unequal exchange over the period 1990-2015 in direct trade, with France net-appropriating large quantities from the CFA zone, particularly land, water and materials (depicted below). This is the material reality of France's longstanding neocolonial system, "Françafrique".

The British Empire was one of the most violent institutions in modern history, built on explicitly racist ideology and guilty of serial crimes against humanity. It is astonishing that OBEs and other honours are given, accepted and celebrated in its name.

Never forget that the clowns who are currently saying “we can’t stop climate change, just accept it” are the same people who spent the last decade doing everything possible to prevent us from stopping climate change.

Replying to @jasonhickel.bsky.social

2 / ...The only difference is that My Lai at least provoked some kind of moral introspection within the West - investigations, in-depth reports, protests - whereas Minab appears to have provoked none.

I'm excited to announce this new piece we have in Nature Sustainability, on the question of post-growth and China. To me, this is the important point: post-growth *must* take account of world-system dynamics and should facilitate, not compromise, Southern liberation. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.comOn the relevance of post-growth in China - Nature SustainabilityPost-growth debates largely ignore China, despite its key position in the world economy, leaving a gap in sustainability discourse. This Perspective examines China’s role in a post-growth transition, ...
View full thread

Note that our convergence scenario targets $34,000 GDP per capita PPP. This is 50% higher than current global GDP. But our scenario does not include sectoral change, as post-growth should (!), which can enable faster decoupling and increase the level of GDP that is compatible with Paris goals.

Therefore, the convergence threshold indicated here should be understood as a modelling heuristic - just for the purposes of exploring various questions - rather than a necessary limit.

I'm excited to announce this new piece we have in Nature Sustainability, on the question of post-growth and China. To me, this is the important point: post-growth *must* take account of world-system dynamics and should facilitate, not compromise, Southern liberation. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.comOn the relevance of post-growth in China - Nature SustainabilityPost-growth debates largely ignore China, despite its key position in the world economy, leaving a gap in sustainability discourse. This Perspective examines China’s role in a post-growth transition, ...
View full thread

We also ask: in a scenario where the core degrows at a rate of 5%, would China face adverse economic consequences? We find the answer is no, hardly at all. In fact, across the South, any harms due to Northern degrowth would be a small fraction of baseline growth rates.

Finally, we discuss synergies and differences between post-growth and China's discourse on "ecological civilisation". There's lots in common, and they can learn from one another. One thing that China adds, which is often missing in post-growth, is a focus on planning and Southern sovereignty.

I'm excited to announce this new piece we have in Nature Sustainability, on the question of post-growth and China. To me, this is the important point: post-growth *must* take account of world-system dynamics and should facilitate, not compromise, Southern liberation. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.comOn the relevance of post-growth in China - Nature SustainabilityPost-growth debates largely ignore China, despite its key position in the world economy, leaving a gap in sustainability discourse. This Perspective examines China’s role in a post-growth transition, ...

We explore a global post-growth scenario where all countries converge to levels of consumption compatible with achieving the Paris Agreement objectives. In this scenario, China's average consumption can increase ~3x while its elites reduce consumption and the core degrows to converge.

In August 5th, 1962, Nelson Mandela was arrested by apartheid police, with support from the CIA, for resisting white minority rule. He was imprisoned for 27 years. US government agencies listed Mandela as a "terrorist" until 2008.