Dr Stuart Wallace
Dr Stuart Wallace
@echrhawk.bsky.social
Associate Professor, University of Leeds, Human Rights and Constitutional Law. Dad, 🎮 gamer, recovering running addict
1.7K followers278 following430 posts
Why do ICJ judgments alternate 1 page French 1 page English?! it is an insane way to present any information. The procedure goblin will know... @drnajimagi.bsky.social
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Happy publication day! Public Law and the UK Supreme Court: www.routledge.com/Public-Law-a... Private Law and the UK Supreme Court: www.routledge.com/Private-Law-...
Hearing a lot of Russell group unis are taking on staggering numbers of Home UG students to offset weaker international recruitment. This has been a recent trend, but it seems to be out of control this recruitment cycle. Downstream impact on newer unis will be catastrophic @gsoh31.bsky.social
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Thanks to this excellent blog, I've recently learned what a super-injunction is. From a foreign public lawyer's perspective it's bonkers. Perhaps Professor Dicey will stop defaming French administrative law now.
Paolo Sandro: Parliamentary democracy under the veil of secrecy: the Afghan leak super-injunction case as a bonfire of constitutional principles ukconstitutionallaw.org/2025/07/23/p...
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Explainer on how the UK could leave the ECHR - and what it would mean. ukandeu.ac.uk/explainers/l...
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
consoc.org.uk/the-payroll-... The UK government's payroll vote has never been higher. In this blog post I explore why that might be and why it is a problem
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
New post: The developing domestic debate about the ECHR: Navigating two extremes publiclawforeveryone.com/2025/07/09/t...
Or "I will bomb the crap out of you... just as soon as I find a way to take off from the bottom of the ocean" abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-....
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Prof Meg Russell's (@conunitucl.bsky.social) 2024 Public Law lecture - "Should we be worried about the decline of parliamentary scrutiny?" - is available open access here: www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/content/dam/...
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
AR v United Kingdom (1 July 2025): hudoc.echr.coe.int?i=001-243878 The Strasbourg Court, disagreeing with the UK Supreme Court (see [2018] UKSC 47), finds a breach of Article 8 ECHR re police disclosures - not "in accordance with the law".
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
The limits of Art 2 Windsor Framework's non-diminution guarantee for post-Brexit NI have yet to be fully tested. An impressive expert report for the NIHRC has just produced a powerful case for it covering a broad range of EU protections as securing environmental rights: nihrc.org/assets/uploa...
Huge congratulations to Khaleed Alsufyyan who passed his viva yesterday. His thesis "The Maritime Counterterrorism Governance Mechanisms in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia". Supervised by Clive Walker and I. Examined by @alangreene.bsky.social and Alex Batesmith
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
This needs to be acknowledged over and over + as I pointed out elsewhere, HRA was also adopted after ECHR was being applied to conflicts and extra-territorially brill.com/view/journal...
...accepting the permanent jurisdiction of the Court in the mid 1990s; (iii) ECHR incorporation via the HRA - 1997 manifesto approved - was done by Parliament in full knowledge of the Court's established interpretative approach; while (iv) the UK was encouraging CEE states to ratify the ECHR.
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
The July 2025 issue of Public Law is now available via westlaw. Featuring Analysis from Tasneem Ghazi (Constitutional Constraints on Delegated powers in the UK and Ireland); Mary Dobbs and @colinmurray.bsky.social (on the Rights Community Action case) and Trevor Wan (on proportionality ...
Dr Stuart Wallace reposted
Really important ECtHR decision this morning declaring the Dalton case inadmissible. This is a really important case on human rights and the legacy of the NI conflict: hudoc.echr.coe.int#{%22itemid%2...
Some kind words from one of the titans of UK constitutional law. This article is forthcoming in public law in a few months. Always good for a sobering conclusion 😂
V good paper by @echrhawk.bsky.social - 'The Human Rights Act under Siege: The Vulnerability of Fundamental Rights Protection under the UK Constitution' - reflecting on implications of legislation passed in 'dying days' of last govt. A sobering conclusion. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
I'm not sure why it is necessary to respond to this. You say the arguments are "not solid", the spec. case apparently involved a person misleading a court about their circumstances. Had he not done so, he would have been unlikely to avail of the ECHR's protection.
The point is that champions of the ECHR need to be able to respond to cases where it appears that people accused (presumably with some cause) or convicted of crimes such as child abuse are using not obviously solid Art 3 (or 8) arguments to delay or avoid deportation or extradition.