Eric Turkheimer reposted
Replying to @bwaber.bsky.social
First was an important talk by @ent3c.bsky.social on grappling with “race science” at Penn Medical Ethics and Health Policy. Highly recommend www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvu5...
Eric Turkheimer
@ent3c.bsky.social
Behavior genetics, clinical psychology, Mets. Occasional politics. Substack (free): https://ericturkheimer.substack.com/ Book Is Out! Understanding the Nature-Nurture Debate https://shorturl.at/Ce2hf Electronic Version: https://shorturl.at/Fq2jv
5.5K followers1K following2.3K posts
Eric Turkheimer reposted
Replying to @bwaber.bsky.social
First was an important talk by @ent3c.bsky.social on grappling with “race science” at Penn Medical Ethics and Health Policy. Highly recommend www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvu5...
In which David Brooks comes up with a way to (anecdotally, without evidence) both-sides the White House press ban: www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsur...
Blog post: Charles Murray Responds about our bet. ericturkheimer.substack.com/p/charles-mu...
Eric Turkheimer reposted
Blog post: The Cofnas Manifesto: The social consequences of hereditarianism.
It's unfortunate, but I agree with Sasha. Cofnas should never have been hired (is there a good account of how that happened?), but having been hired I don't like to see him let go for ideological reasons, despite the awfulness of his ideology. I would be fine with dismissing him at his next renewal.
Seeing some arguments for firing Cofnas like this one, that (scare quotes) academic freedom should not apply to pseudo-scholarship and taxpayers shouldn't fund scholar-activism. I think this is wrong. /1
Blog post. Richard Hanania on Race and Intelligence: In which he explains David Reich to David Reich.
Quick post today. My effect size hobby: Random GWAS arrives across my transom. No Damien Morris, five minute read. ericturkheimer.substack.com/p/my-effect-...
The Damien Morris reply, part umpteen: The Gloomy Prospect comes for genomics.
Blog post: The Gloomy Prospect, Revisited. More replies to Damien Morris.
All these negative stories about Fauci's diary are unfair. Who wouldn't be embarrassed to have our private diary published? Beyond that is an expectation for people who ascend to big leadership positions. The NIH directors I have met have many admirable qualities; humility is not one of them.
Blog post. Dennett, Determinism, and the Nonshared Environment: Genetic determinism is no myth. More in my thread on Damien Morris.
Eric Turkheimer reposted
Blog Post: Part 1 of my reply to Damien Morris. Am I a Free Will Compatibilist? Daniel Dennett and me. tldr; Morris doesn't think I am a compatibilist, but Dennett did.
Blog post: Damien Morris on Free Will (1/x): Introduction, Clarifications, and a Concession. An introduction to a series of replies to a three-part monograph by Damien Morris. ericturkheimer.substack.com/p/damien-mor...
Blog post: Peter Visscher's defense of behavior genetics. Blah blah blah from yours truly. ericturkheimer.substack.com/p/peter-viss...
Blog post: The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study Was It "Race Science"? Did MTRAS accomplish anything?
Here is a link to the article I am blogging about. Let me know if you can't get through the firewall and I will send you a pdf.
Eric Turkheimer reposted
Precise genome editing of human embryos triggers praise and alarm www.nature.com/articles/d41... ... I have some thoughts...
Regardless of what you think about Graham Platner-- I don't know what I think-- it is becoming clear that the Times is going full-bore Hillary's emails on the story. www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/u...
Review of my book, "Understanding The Nature-Debate" in the Journal of Economic Methodology, by Hannah Allen.
My wife is in Alzheimer's research. It turns out that the same bogus "quantile regression" methods that have been used to exaggerate genomic findings (bsky.app/profile/ent3...) are also being used to promote marginally effective AD treatments.
Yesterday @kph3k noted that I "loathe" decile analysis as a way of describing the results of a PGS analysis. The subsequent discussion clarified why I loathe it-- it's a misleading way of reporting results, a systematic sleight of hand to disguise the import of a small effect. /1
New blog post: Galton's Grandma was right. I locate the the preprint from Jaishankar et al in this history of Galtonian behavior genetics: a remarkable methodological achievement, with devastating-- and mostly unacknowledged-- substantive implications for the field. open.substack.com/pub/ericturk...
With @remyfurrer.bsky.social, a new piece in Nature Human Behavior. The standard description of a polygenic score as a "genetic predisposition" essentializes a statistical construct. It's not language policing: PGS are a new kind of entity; now is the time to think carefully about what they are.
Shareable link to Nature Human Behavior paper on polygenic scores. Hope it works.
A Substack post on the Nature Human Genetics article. The piece itself is very short, so it is sort of a summary of a summary.
Blog Post: Essence Medicine and Outcome Medicine. It's about a paradox: The most dramatic scientific discoveries, the ones behavior geneticists can't stop reaching for, turn out to be the most ethically problematic.
In the interest of not thinking about the Virginia Supreme Court decision, I wrote a blog post. The Schizophrenogenic Mother: Behavior Genetics' Origin Story Misses the Point open.substack.com/pub/ericturk...
Who is worse than Nathan Cofnas? How about Steve Sailer? See Sailer's comment and my reply. Important to recognize that admixture analysis, the race-guys latest enthusiasm, is also a dead end. substack.com/@stevesailer...
I wrote a reply to @nathancofnas.bsky.social on Substack. Nathan has been dragging me over his tendentious interpretation of a blog post I wrote 20 years ago, which I already explained many times. Nathan's contention is that I am lying about what I really think, but fortunately he knows better.
Finally, a fart-GWAS.
The discussion yesterday led me to fix the links to this piece. If thinking about Cofnas has you thinking about so-called racial differences in behavior, you might be interested. The same argument in spelled out at greater length in Chapter 9 of my book. @ptrbck.bsky.social
This tiresome nonsense follows from a poorly worded sentence I wrote in 2008. The Cato Institute invited James Flynn to write a piece about intelligence, with several comments. The conversation turned, as such conversations will, to race, and I wrote this. I still like it. /1
At some point Cofnas discussed a quote by @ent3c.bsky.social that "showed" that scientists don’t want people to know “the truth” about race. To find the original, I first had to wade through search results giving articles by MacDonald, Rindermann, and Kirkegaard (all using the same snippet). /8
I explain the whole business in this old blogpost. /3
This tiresome nonsense follows from a poorly worded sentence I wrote in 2008. The Cato Institute invited James Flynn to write a piece about intelligence, with several comments. The conversation turned, as such conversations will, to race, and I wrote this. I still like it. /1
At some point Cofnas discussed a quote by @ent3c.bsky.social that "showed" that scientists don’t want people to know “the truth” about race. To find the original, I first had to wade through search results giving articles by MacDonald, Rindermann, and Kirkegaard (all using the same snippet). /8
Thanks to Thomas Friedman for turning me on to the idea of a "Wicked Problem". The role of genetics in the genesis of human behavioral differences is a scientific wicked problem. What is your favorite wicked problem?
I get really sick of this. Trump is Trump, the Repubs can't help themselves, but Dems should be "moderate." Eff that. Nice governors finish last.