Eric Turkheimer

Eric Turkheimer

@ent3c.bsky.social

Behavior genetics, clinical psychology, Mets. Occasional politics. Substack (free): https://ericturkheimer.substack.com/ Book Is Out! Understanding the Nature-Nurture Debate https://shorturl.at/Ce2hf Electronic Version: https://shorturl.at/Fq2jv

5.5K followers1K following2.3K posts

Eric Turkheimer reposted

My letter responding to The Economist’s “designer babies” editorial is out. The editorial cites our study on public attitudes toward polygenic embryo screening but omits a key finding: attitudes became less favorable when participants first considered potential concerns. Link below.

It's unfortunate, but I agree with Sasha. Cofnas should never have been hired (is there a good account of how that happened?), but having been hired I don't like to see him let go for ideological reasons, despite the awfulness of his ideology. I would be fine with dismissing him at his next renewal.

Sasha Gusev@sashagusevposts.bsky.social

Seeing some arguments for firing Cofnas like this one, that (scare quotes) academic freedom should not apply to pseudo-scholarship and taxpayers shouldn't fund scholar-activism. I think this is wrong. /1

With apologies for being a grump, picture taking in museums has gotten out of control. It seems to make people happy and I have mostly learned to ignore it, but if someone who indulges can explain the pleasure to me I promise not to judge. Corollary: restaurant food.

As I think about this, the more offended I get that Visscher would write a paper that is implicitly very critical of me while casually admitting that he has never read a relevant word I have written. Proud of his ignorance. He ought to be embarrassed.

My wife is in Alzheimer's research. It turns out that the same bogus "quantile regression" methods that have been used to exaggerate genomic findings (bsky.app/profile/ent3...) are also being used to promote marginally effective AD treatments.

medpagetoday.comStudy Questions Methods Used in Alzheimer's Drug AnalysisQuantile aggregation may lead to overstated claims about amyloid-cognition relationships
Eric Turkheimer@ent3c.bsky.social

Yesterday @kph3k noted that I "loathe" decile analysis as a way of describing the results of a PGS analysis. The subsequent discussion clarified why I loathe it-- it's a misleading way of reporting results, a systematic sleight of hand to disguise the import of a small effect. /1

I take pride in my letters of recommendation. I hate being forced to squeeze them into text windows on a web form, responding to banal and repetitive questions. A hill I will die on: Not all human processes are improved by standardizing them.

With @remyfurrer.bsky.social, a new piece in Nature Human Behavior. The standard description of a polygenic score as a "genetic predisposition" essentializes a statistical construct. It's not language policing: PGS are a new kind of entity; now is the time to think carefully about what they are.

nature.comPolygenic risk scores are not genetic predispositions - Nature Human BehaviourNature Human Behaviour - Polygenic risk scores are not genetic predispositions

This tiresome nonsense follows from a poorly worded sentence I wrote in 2008. The Cato Institute invited James Flynn to write a piece about intelligence, with several comments. The conversation turned, as such conversations will, to race, and I wrote this. I still like it. /1

cato-unbound.orgRace and IQ
Pieter T. L. Beck@ptrbck.bsky.social

At some point Cofnas discussed a quote by @ent3c.bsky.social that "showed" that scientists don’t want people to know “the truth” about race. To find the original, I first had to wade through search results giving articles by MacDonald, Rindermann, and Kirkegaard (all using the same snippet). /8

View full thread

This tiresome nonsense follows from a poorly worded sentence I wrote in 2008. The Cato Institute invited James Flynn to write a piece about intelligence, with several comments. The conversation turned, as such conversations will, to race, and I wrote this. I still like it. /1

cato-unbound.orgRace and IQ
Pieter T. L. Beck@ptrbck.bsky.social

At some point Cofnas discussed a quote by @ent3c.bsky.social that "showed" that scientists don’t want people to know “the truth” about race. To find the original, I first had to wade through search results giving articles by MacDonald, Rindermann, and Kirkegaard (all using the same snippet). /8