Farnaz Jahanbakhsh

Farnaz Jahanbakhsh

@farnazj.bsky.social

assistant prof in Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Michigan, prev postdoc at Stanford HAI, PhD at MIT CSAIL, research in HCI and Social Computing

1.1K followers253 following9 posts

What would it look like to move beyond normatively imposing a single set of values on everyone, and instead build generative AI systems that adapt to the values that matter most to each person in each situation? Excited that our work led by @rashonpoole.bsky.social will be at EMNLP!

rashonpoole.bsky.social@rashonpoole.bsky.social

Excited to share that our paper “Personalizing LLMs Through User Value Profiles” has been accepted to @emnlpmeeting.bsky.social 2026 Main Track! #emnlp2026

📰 Our piece with @ziv-e.bsky.social and @mbernst.bsky.social in The Conversation today. Feed algorithms optimize for engagement behavior because it is easy to measure. The result is that the values amplified in people's feeds are misaligned with what they value. theconversation.com/why-social-m...

theconversation.comWhy social media algorithms send you posts you don’t likeAlgorithms on X tend to bring you posts that contradict your values, and it happens more to Democrats than Republicans.

Farnaz Jahanbakhsh reposted

Do our social media algorithms correctly reflect our values? Our new article published today in @pnas.org shows that the answer is often not, and that the content that gets promoted into their ranked feeds is often actively counter to our values.

Our new CHI paper raises two connected ideas: (1) we can’t—and shouldn’t expect to—agree on all accounts of harm, which makes universal moderation inherently limited; and (2) instead of suppressing the content that harms a given user, we can transform it in a personalized way to preserve its value.

Rayhan Rashed@rayhan.io

What if moderation didn’t mean suppression for the user? #CHI2026 For the past year, my advisor @farnazj.bsky.social and I have been exploring a frustration: content moderation is centralized and binary, even though harm is often subjective.

Farnaz Jahanbakhsh reposted

Our new article in @science.org enables social media reranking outside of platforms' walled gardens. We add an LLM-powered reranking of highly polarizing political content into N=1256 participants' feeds. Downranking cools tensions with the opposite party—but upranking inflames them.

Farnaz Jahanbakhsh reposted

📣 Yale workshop, Oct 16-17! 📣 How could/should content ranking work? What's new in content moderation? How can platforms promote civility? Hosted by Yale's Institute for Foundations of Data Science (FDS). Great speakers! Submit posters by 9/22! Spread the word! yalefds.swoogo.com/socialalgori...

yalefds.swoogo.comNew Directions in Social Algorithms Research on October 16-17, 2025 at Yale UniversityAs social media algorithms increasingly mediate social experiences, there has been a rapid increase in research on the effects of how these algorithms are configured, alternatives to engagement-centri...

Farnaz Jahanbakhsh reposted

New paper: Do social media algorithms shape affective polarization? We ran a field experiment on X/Twitter (N=1,256) using LLMs to rerank content in real-time, adjusting exposure to polarizing posts. Result: Algorithmic ranking impacts feelings toward the political outgroup! 🧵⬇️

View full thread

It gives any user the power to assess content accuracy & specify whose assessment they trust. Of course platforms are unlikely to change their design so drastically, not w/o push from the outside. What’s more, people encounter (mis)information anywhere on the web, not just on social platforms.

It is unrealistic to expect that every website on the web, some the very perpetrators of misinformation, offer misinformation moderation and in a fair and rigorous way. And here’s where our CHI'24 paper comes to the rescue.

You are up to date.