Freya Holmér

Freya Holmér

@freya.bsky.social

🎮 freelance tech artist 🐱 street (cat) photographer 🔥 shader sorceress/math dork 🏗️ Shader Forge / Shapes / https://half-edge.xyz 🪡 neoluddite my kids: 🥪 @toast.acegikmo.com 🥗 @salad.acegikmo.com 🐈‍⬛ @thor.acegikmo.com 🏕️ @gumpy.acegikmo.com

39.8K followers424 following6.6K posts

she's studying very diligently for example, I saw her process in figuring out that you can't actually enter that big hole at the front of cameras

normally I wouldn't clarify that no children were kicked in the face in the making of my projects but in a society normalizing kicking children in the face ig I'll label too

Eniko Fox@enikofox.com

tbh if you're someone making videos on YT especially making videos about things you made using coding on YT it might be worthwhile to lead with a "made by humans, no generative AI was used in the creation of this video/game/whatever" splash screen

and with that I'm starting an experimental detox week 1. heavily reduced internet use 2. no adhd meds for a bit 3. cat photography walk every day

see I've tried using AI for coding I'd like to think I'm special and immune to AI addiction, but the reality is probably just that I'm incapable of feeling any kind of attachment or pride in AI generated code I feel like it pollutes the project and displaces my own motivation, I just don't want it

View full thread

it's been useful to have AI review my code snippets and suggest stuff I might've missed, like "there's an API call called X so you don't need to manually do Y here" because in that case, I still write all my code, and the only purpose of the AI is to improve my craft, rather than substitute it

but to review AI generated code? that feels *super* dehumanizing and gross to me, it's actually so soul draining. it's literally just cleaning up after the robots instead of engaging in the craft I feel for the people being more or less forced to do this at work

see I've tried using AI for coding I'd like to think I'm special and immune to AI addiction, but the reality is probably just that I'm incapable of feeling any kind of attachment or pride in AI generated code I feel like it pollutes the project and displaces my own motivation, I just don't want it

the most useful stuff for me with AI is mostly as a search engine that understands natural language and with stuff like code and math, you can actually verify that it didn't make something up

I've had someone unironically argue that it's actually good if all these jobs are lost to AI because it's actually better when people make things as a hobby instead of "selling out"

RTGame 👑@rtgame.bsky.social

It would be lovely if the video games industry would let the people who make the games buy food

it puts me in a weird position making pro-capitalist arguments to people who are generally further to the right of me like, there's actually a lot of success stories of people making a living doing their craft, isn't that like, a good thing, that it's possible? work hard, get opportunities etc.?

everyone around me told me I was crazy for wanting a carpeted floor, especially living with three (now four) cats. (basically nobody in sweden has carpeted floors anymore) I have 0 regrets!! extremely worth it, they all play and run around so much more than they ever did on hardwood floor ❤️

detective toast@toast.acegikmo.com

people said pet stains would get stuck forever and it would trap smells, but, you can literally just, wet vac + use stain removal. it's extremely effective! the only stain so far I haven't been able to fully remove was literally my fault, spilling tea 💀

Freya Holmér reposted

Replying to @freya.bsky.social

im in my 2nd year of (gamedev) university now, and its going great. Im learning so much in terms of programming and also other niches. we have a course where we gotta make a game for the NES in assembly, and another where we make a path tracer! and none of these courses and teachers support ai!

I've been wanting to put my whole position on AI in one place so that I can link it but I'm kinda struggling to find a good structure flowcharts are too sprawling, but it's nice to have a hierarchy! text is too linear, but it's a lot more readable!

View full thread

I think framing it in the Q&A format, ie: writing out my responses to common AI questions, is probably the most useful format for others to read, because it will likely help people develop their own thoughts and bring some of those arguments with them

actually obsidian has some useful in-page linking feature, so I could even make every response short and just in-page link to the section that has my position, kinda like: Q: is thing? A: yes because [#X] and [#Y] seem inevitable and then below the Q&A: # X bla bla bla bla # Y blaaaa blaa bla

I've been wanting to put my whole position on AI in one place so that I can link it but I'm kinda struggling to find a good structure flowcharts are too sprawling, but it's nice to have a hierarchy! text is too linear, but it's a lot more readable!

I'm also not sure if it should have like, a narrative thread like an essay, or if it should be a very distilled prop logic hierarchy of my exact position and why, or if it should be a list of common pro-AI arguments along with my response to each of them it's hard to do all three at the same time

what if I write it in C# using interfaces and then maybe that will automatically show errors where there's flaws in my logic what if lean but arguments instead of math

3am mental connection: - fast travel in video games - creating things with AI - exclusively going outside for errands or to get somewhere else all of these reduce opportunities for serendipity, they prevent you from enjoying the now by recontextualizing your surroundings as a means to an end

one of my big realizations was when I noticed how differently I behave at home vs how I behave when traveling when I travel, I would have moments where I *plan* to just casually meander about and explore it made me wonder - why do I never do this at home?

actually there's another parallel I've often said that, to me, creativity is the ability to create something beautiful under constraints maybe the common thread is people who see their own vision as the ideal, so they preemptively shut the doors on letting the journey affect that goal

it really does feel like they just got away with unprecedented amount of theft of expertise, and are now profiting off of it while replacing the professional opportunities for the very crafts and humans it trained on I never thought I would see the concept of expertise get so devalued

View full thread

it really does feel like they just got away with unprecedented amount of theft of expertise, and are now profiting off of it while replacing the professional opportunities for the very crafts and humans it trained on I never thought I would see the concept of expertise get so devalued

my entire life trajectory was oriented towards "being good at things", I sacrificed quite a lot to get where I am today, and now society has deemed expertise not very valuable anymore and for what little remains, AI/people using AI will siphon it out of you the very moment they smell it in the air

automation is supposed to target things people within any given craft consider rote and tedious, things that have almost no creative agency but when you automate things those within the craft love doing, that help us grow as artists/thinkers/designers, you're removing humanity from the craft

it's kinda funny, I know at least two of my debate opponents have asked AI models to help them prepare for debating me I'm a very public person, so the AI models do actually know my arguments from youtube transcripts and various tweets over the years anyway my secret is that I don't use AI to prep

Freya Holmér@freya.bsky.social

I've been miring in AI debates so much even I can provide a better pro-AI argument than most of these meat proxy millionaires

I've been miring in AI debates so much even I can provide a better pro-AI argument than most of these meat proxy millionaires

Chet Faliszek@chetsucks.com

But what is Tim and Elon's argument? What points do they raise? What insight do they offer? None... because Tim spends all day talking to LLMs he doesn't provide an argument or counter-point - he tells Kenney how to think. Think like me - he is trying to correct an LLM not speak to a human.