GerstnerLab

GerstnerLab

@gerstnerlab.bsky.social

The Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience @EPFL studies models of neurons, networks of neurons, synaptic plasticity, and learning in the brain.

373 followers119 following23 posts

GerstnerLab reposted

Both brains and RNNs can re-use components of computation across similar tasks or contexts. But what exactly are those “shared components”? How can they be used to solve several tasks? We address these questions in a new preprint with @avm.bsky.social! Link: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgInterpretable compositional computation with recurrent neural networksFlexible cognition utilizes reusable components to enable rapid adaptation of behavior to different contexts or tasks. Analysis of artificial neural networks trained on multiple tasks suggested that t...

How can the brain learn the hidden hierarchical structure from high dimensional data? In our latest work, we use synthetic datasets to analyze two classes of bio-plausible learning rules: variants of Direct Feedback Alignment, and local self-supervised learning. We find only the latter succeeds.

View full thread

Local self-supervised rules (CLAPP, LPL, layerwise SimCLR) succeed with the same data efficiency as supervised backprop. These algorithms need no backward pass because they optimize separate objectives at each layer. The weight-updates can be written as Hebbian-like plasticity rules.

How can the brain learn the hidden hierarchical structure from high dimensional data? In our latest work, we use synthetic datasets to analyze two classes of bio-plausible learning rules: variants of Direct Feedback Alignment, and local self-supervised learning. We find only the latter succeeds.

View full thread

Direct Feedback Alignment and its variants fail to learn hidden hierarchies, even with near-optimal feedback weights. The reason: DFA ignores input-specific masking - the derivative of forward activations. In controlled experiments, we demonstrate its necessity in approximating backpropagation.

How can the brain learn the hidden hierarchical structure from high dimensional data? In our latest work, we use synthetic datasets to analyze two classes of bio-plausible learning rules: variants of Direct Feedback Alignment, and local self-supervised learning. We find only the latter succeeds.

We focus primarily on these two classes because they satisfy the biological constraints: no weight transport or symmetric feedback architecture, no need for slow convergence of activities.

GerstnerLab reposted

Accepted at ICML 2026. I am extremely proud of this work. Local learning is starting to work really well! The theoretical perspective of local learning minimizing an emergent global objective has been eye opening Congrats @zihan-wu.bsky.social and Ariane Delrocq! Great team

Zihan Wu@zihan-wu.bsky.social

Can we match self-supervised backpropagation using local learning rules? We show it is possible in our new paper accepted by ICML. We achieve: 1. theoretical equivalence to BP in a controlled setup 2. new SOTA for local learning across image datasets 3. same performance as BP on multiple datasets

How far are biologically-plausible local learning rules from backpropagation (BP)? In our new ICML paper we look at local self-supervised learning and find how to better align its gradients to BP. We achieve competitive performance on various datasets!

Zihan Wu@zihan-wu.bsky.social

Can we match self-supervised backpropagation using local learning rules? We show it is possible in our new paper accepted by ICML. We achieve: 1. theoretical equivalence to BP in a controlled setup 2. new SOTA for local learning across image datasets 3. same performance as BP on multiple datasets

Ever heard of the lottery ticket hypothesis? Our new paper shows that lottery tickets are not a useful metaphor to explain the success of overparameterized neural networks - and suggests an alternative metaphor: escape dimensions

Flavio Martinelli@flavioh.bsky.social

NEW PAPER. Why do larger networks train better? "Because they contain more candidate *sub*networks that can learn the task" → lottery tickets This popular explanation uses an appealing but misleading metaphor🧵 We propose an intuitive alternative grounded in theory: escape dimensions

GerstnerLab reposted

GerstnerLab reposted

Presenting a poster tomorrow at Cosyne 26: [3-033] Compositional computation via shared latent dynamics in low-rank RNNs. With @avm.bsky.social, we explore how RNNs can re-use the same dynamics across different tasks, and what it implies for their connectivity and neural activity.

GerstnerLab reposted

GerstnerLab reposted

🧵Excited to present our latest work at #Neurips25! Together with @avm.bsky.social, we discover 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲: regions in neural networks loss landscapes where parameters diverge to infinity (in regression settings!) We find that MLPs in these channels can take derivatives and compute GLUs 🤯

GerstnerLab reposted

This was a lot of fun! From my side, it started with a technical Q: what's the relation between two-side cavity and path integrals? Turns out it's a fluctuation correction - and amazingly, this also enable the "O(N) rank" theory by @david-g-clark.bsky.social and @omarschall.bsky.social. 🤯

David G. Clark@david-g-clark.bsky.social

Now in PRX: Theory linking connectivity structure to collective activity in nonlinear RNNs! For neuro fans: conn. structure can be invisible in single neurons but shape pop. activity For low-rank RNN fans: a theory of rank=O(N) For physics fans: fluctuations around DMFT saddle⇒dimension of activity

View full thread
View full thread

🧠 “You never forget how to ride a bike”, but how is that possible? Our study proposes a bio-plausible meta-plasticity rule that shapes synapses over time, enabling selective recall based on context

sciencedirect.comContext selectivity with dynamic availability enables lifelong continual learning“You never forget how to ride a bike”, – but how is that possible? The brain is able to learn complex skills, stop the practice for years, learn other…

We designed a Gating/Availabilty model that detects selective neurons - most useful neuron for the task - during learning, shunt activity of the others (Gating) and decrease the learning rate of task selective neuron (Availability)

We designed a Bio-inspired Context-specific gating of plasticity and neuronal activity allowing for a drastic reduction in catastrophic forgetting. We also show the capacity of our model of both forward and backward transfer! All of this thanks to the shared neuronal activity across tasks.

GerstnerLab reposted

So happy to see this work out! 🥳 Huge thanks to our two amazing reviewers who pushed us to make the paper much stronger. A truly joyful collaboration with @lucasgruaz.bsky.social, @sobeckerneuro.bsky.social, and Johanni Brea! 🥰 Tweeprint on an earlier version: bsky.app/profile/modi... 🧠🧪👩‍🔬

Open Mind@openmindjournal.bsky.social

dlvr.itMerits of Curiosity: A Simulation StudyAbstract‘Why are we curious?’ has been among the central puzzles of neuroscience and psychology in the past decades. A popular hypothesis is that curiosity is driven by intrinsically generated reward signals, which have evolved to support survival in complex environments. To formalize and test this hypothesis, we need to understand the enigmatic relationship between (i) intrinsic rewards (as drives of curiosity), (ii) optimality conditions (as objectives of curiosity), and (iii) environment structures. Here, we demystify this relationship through a systematic simulation study. First, we propose an algorithm to generate environments that capture key abstract features of different real-world situations. Then, we simulate artificial agents that explore these environments by seeking one of six representative intrinsic rewards: novelty, surprise, information gain, empowerment, maximum occupancy principle, and successor-predecessor intrinsic exploration. We evaluate the exploration performance of these simulated agents regarding three potential objectives of curiosity: state discovery, model accuracy, and uniform state visitation. Our results show that the comparative performance of each intrinsic reward is highly dependent on the environmental features and the curiosity objective; this indicates that ‘optimality’ in top-down theories of curiosity needs a precise formulation of assumptions. Nevertheless, we found that agents seeking a combination of novelty and information gain always achieve a close-to-optimal performance on objectives of curiosity as well as in collecting extrinsic rewards. This suggests that novelty and information gain are two principal axes of curiosity-driven behavior. These results pave the way for the further development of computational models of curiosity and the design of theory-informed experimental paradigms.

GerstnerLab reposted

Attending #CCN2025? Come by our poster in the afternoon (4th floor, Poster 72) to talk about the sense of control, empowerment, and agency. 🧠🤖 We propose a unifying formulation of the sense of control and use it to empirically characterize the human subjective sense of control. 🧑‍🔬🧪🔬

GerstnerLab reposted

Stoked to be at RLDM! Curious how novelty and exploration are impacted by generalization across similar stimuli? Then don't miss my flash talk in the PIMBAA workshop (tmr at 10:30, E McNabb Theatre) or stop by my poster tmr (#74)! Looking forward to chat 🤩 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

biorxiv.orgRepresentational similarity modulates neural and behavioral signatures of noveltyNovelty signals in the brain modulate learning and drive exploratory behaviors in humans and animals. While the perceived novelty of a stimulus is known to depend on previous experience, the effect of...

GerstnerLab reposted

Our new preprint 👀

Matteo Carandini@carandinilab.net

The firing of neural populations is high-dim even if their subthreshold activity is low-dim! This work by @bio-emergent.bsky.social and @haydari.bsky.social shows how, with a solvable model, a data analysis technique, and data from mouse visual cortex: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

GerstnerLab reposted

Interested in high-dim chaotic networks? Ever wondered about the structure of their state space? @jakobstubenrauch.bsky.social has answers - from a separation of fixed points and dynamics onto distinct shells to a shared lower-dim manifold and linear prediction of dynamics.

Jakob Stubenrauch@jakobstubenrauch.bsky.social

(1/3) How to analyse a dynamical system? Find its fixed points, study their properties! How to analyse a *high-dimensional* dynamical system? Find its fixed points, study their properties! We do that for a chaotic neural network! finally published: doi.org/10.1103/Phys...

GerstnerLab reposted

GerstnerLab reposted

GerstnerLab reposted

New round of spike vs rate? The concentration of measure phenomenon can explain the emergence of rate-based dynamics in networks of spiking neurons, even when no two neurons are the same. This is what's shown in the last paper of my PhD, out today in Physical Review Letters 🎉 tinyurl.com/4rprwrw5

tinyurl.comEmergent Rate-Based Dynamics in Duplicate-Free Populations of Spiking NeuronsCan spiking neural networks (SNNs) approximate the dynamics of recurrent neural networks? Arguments in classical mean-field theory based on laws of large numbers provide a positive answer when each ne...

GerstnerLab reposted

Pre-print 🧠🧪 Is mechanism modeling dead in the AI era? ML models trained to predict neural activity fail to generalize to unseen opto perturbations. But mechanism modeling can solve that. We say "perturbation testing" is the right way to evaluate mechanisms in data-constrained models 1/8

You are up to date.