Jacob Gifford Head

Jacob Gifford Head

@giffordhead.co.uk

Barrister & mediator. Things I like: legal history & legal oddities; music & musical instruments; Mesopotamian history; & Portuguese wine and Port. My professional website is: http://www.giffordhead.co.uk Please email rather than DM! Forgive typos.

2.2K followers1K following20.9K posts

On the water storage point, I have wondered why this isn't really a building regs matter? Isn't one obvious way of doing this with a cold water storage tank which was a tradition feature of British plumbing? I think they aren't that popular these days. Should they be compulsory?

Charlotte Lydia Riley@lottelydia.bsky.social

sorry, but the British government now apparently envisages a scenario that would require me to keep forty eight litres of drinking water in my house for emergencies? oh right I’ll just shove it in the reservoir I’ve got in the back bedroom then

This is a very interesting case. I wonder what they have pleaded as a cause of action? A declaration (do they mean an injunction?) to require someone not to publish a benchmark price isn't someone one sees everyday.

I suppose a consequence of the BBC's cybersecurity correspondent not having messed around with php at any stage of his life is that all the jokes about languages in Bob Kanefsky's "Eternal Flame" are completely obscure...

I always wanted to be able to code in lisp but never had a reason to try & learning it in the abstract never appealed. I guess I should have started with emacs rather than vim as my text editor!

The song continues: "And I basically hate hieroglyphs, so I won't use APL." which would be my number 1 choice for impractical language to learn but I'm not sure anyone uses that any more!

Well, that explains my post from this morning asking why the BBC's coverage seemed to include no technical information whatsoever.

Mic Wright@brokenbottleboy.bsky.social

I saw a screenshot of this and had to go and check if it was real. How can you be the BBC’s cyber correspondent and not have heard of PHP before yesterday? *And* now be talking confidently about it on the news. www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ck...

I think one of the problems is that a lot of these figurative sculptures are just not that good: the Kindertransport monument at Liverpool Street; the Windrush one in Waterloo; and—worst of all—The Meeting Place at St Pancras.

Though I think having a memorial in a station is perfectly fitting. I sometimes look at the Battle of Waterloo memorial at Waterloo station or the many memorials from the two World Wars. It is much better to have these things amongst us than separate.

This is absolutely infuriating. In England, we absolutely do not take this for granted. Most courts do not provide adequate facilities for parties and their lawyers. Public access is often difficult & sometimes impossible. These are luxuries that the UKSC & not much else possesses.

Joshua Rozenberg@joshuarozenberg.bsky.social

The idea that we should resurrect the judicial role of the House of Lords — which ended in 2009 — is not only impractical but would be against our national interests, the UK’s most senior judge said in a lecture last night. rozenberg.substack.com/p/remember-t...

As for “legal disputes should be heard in a courtroom”, I agree. But there has been a significant roll-back here. For example, CPR 51ZC and the “Small Claims Paper Determination Pilot” or the “Single Justice Procedure” in the Magistrates’ Court. Access to a courtroom has never been harder.

I should say, in fairness to him, that I understand what he means. He thinks “the idea” is now taken for granted, which it mostly is, beyond a few exceptions like planning or regulatory matters & the increasing use of ADR. But, still, this is really annoying phrasing in light of the current issues.

One of the few exceptions to my generally Whig view of history is car colours. This was mostly caused by the VW Golf Harlequin which has essentially never been matched.

thetruthaboutcars.comA Volkswagen With a Coat of Many Colors: 1996 Golf HarlequinFull gallery here.It’s not clear whether they were inspired by one of Doyle Dane Bernbach’s clever ads for the VW Beetle in the 1960s or by the biblical story of Joseph and his coat of many colors, bu...
Jo Kibble (Political Animal)@politicanimal.bsky.social

Really noticed this the other day. Vaguely remembered my mum would pass the time at a bus stop with v young me by going ‘red car…blue car’ etc as they passed. Thought I’d do the same with our baby while waiting for the 161. Within about a minute I was bored of saying ‘grey car’. So tedious!

Barros is one of the more affordable Port shippers these days. The fact that this bottle had two foil caps & a cork marked simply "Porto Vintage 1996" suggests to me they were hedging their bets under which brand it would eventually be sold. But that shouldn't put you off buying it!

1996 was an under-rated year, being nearly surrounded by the general declarations of 1994—the year of the decade—and 1997 but some very good Port was made, particularly the Vesúvio which is one of my favourites.

This one is a straight-forward Port. Bright fruit flavours, with a decently long aftertaste. There's not much tannin left by Vintage Port standards but good acidity which will keep it going. You'd hope the big names would be much better but on its own budget terms there is nothing wrong.

“To start with, litigation is an inherently adversarial process and there is a degree of opportunism in much litigation activity.” And this is, with respect, why civil procedure has lost its way in England as litigants are faced with a thicket of rules full of traps for the unwary or unfortunate.

View full thread

Secondly, let us stop the procedural tail from wagging the dog of justice. The purpose of procedural rules is to enable the courts to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost (to coin a phrase). That means there needs to be much, much more flexibility.

This means getting rid of the plague that has been Mitchell, Denton etc. It means that most breaches of the rules should be dealt with by asking just two questions: a) Has the breach caused prejudice? b) If so, what is the remedy for the prejudice?

“To start with, litigation is an inherently adversarial process and there is a degree of opportunism in much litigation activity.” And this is, with respect, why civil procedure has lost its way in England as litigants are faced with a thicket of rules full of traps for the unwary or unfortunate.

I think two things need to happen. Firstly, a back-to-basics approach to the CPR. Let’s have one civil procedure code. That means getting rid of all the alternative procedure codes shoved in CPR 50-69 & elsewhere (e.g. the Insolvency Rules, Non-Contentious Probate Rules etc.)

I agree with Jess here. Successive governments are obsessed with banning & criminalising behaviour which, in this case in particular, are social problems not legal ones. Just one more criminal offence 'till we have built Jerusalem, in Englands green & pleasant land...

Jess O'Thomson@jessothomson.co.uk

Stuff like this really brings out my libertarian tendencies. I loathe this behaviour as much as the next person – but not sure I think headphone police fining people more than they get fined for far more serious offences is the answer.

This remains a highlight of the year. And glorious weather today which I hope will mean lots of cash for the Spa Valley Railway. But, whisper it softly, most of the green hop beers are now boringly competent rather than wild & experimental...

I am often restricted in setting out some of the nonsense the court system produces because of client confidentiality. But, in this case, I am the client. Here is the court being an obstructive as possible to get in the way of a settlement when, as is hinted at, it has no jurisdiction.

Notice, too, the obfuscation. “Legal Advisor Fox”: since when is being a legal advisor a title? Notice, too, the typo. There are more. If this is what lawyers face when litigating, what hope litigants in person?

(For the avoidance of doubt, the draft order was not an attempt to combine a Tomlin order and Discontinuance. Hence the key word being “intention” in the phrase “intention to discontinue”.)

A grim statistic here and a reminder how lucky those of us who have managed to qualify fully are.

Bar Standards Board@barstandardsboard.bsky.social

📢 We’ve published our annual Bar Training Stats report. It includes pass rates, pupillage rates and fees for taking the Bar Training Course. 🔗 Read the full report: buff.ly/N6ZRG3H #BarTrainingCourse #Pupillage #Barristers #Law

How to prove you are a lawyer in 2 seconds? Not being able to spell "judgement". Accidentally describing the World Cup final as being "Spain and Argentina". Never quite knowing if you are supposed to shake someone's hand or not.

Raffi Melkonian@rmfifthcircuit.bsky.social

Thing is, it’s really really easy to prove you’re a lawyer. I can prove I’m a lawyer in 2 seconds.

Is it common to have an unarmed honour guard? I appreciate it is all ceremony but the symbolism that the only protection is the Garrison Sergeant Major’s pointy stick doesn’t feel quite on point...

Peter Walker@peterwalker99.bsky.social

And here he is.

This is about Magistrates recruitment. It is something which I think is a greater issue in the Family Court. The whole purpose of lay involvement in decision making about children is defeated if the benches routinely do not contain people who have or are friends with people with young children.

Joanna Hardy-Susskind@joannahs.bsky.social

Ok. Maths not a strong point for me. But if 36% of new recruits (the new ones!) are under 50 - then how many are over the age of 50? How. Many? And how many defendants and witnesses and complainants are under the age of 50?

Far too often the bench is comprised of people in their 60s making decisions about parents in their 30s who have children under 10. The dynamic is one of grandparents making decisions about grandchildren: very different from what it should be.

I don’t, for one second, think that you need to have children yourself to be able to make decisions about children. But I do think when you are asking non-lawyers to make these decisions, it is essential for them to have a good idea of what is like to be a parent in 2026.

For the public to really understand the full majesty of the English legal system, they should broadcast the esoteric ritual that is the winding up petitions list each week...

Shoaib M Khan@shoaibmkhan.bsky.social

Court broadcasting is being expanded, so Administrative Court proceedings and sentencing remarks by the Chief Magistrate can be filmed for the first time. www.gov.uk/government/n...

I am planning a trip to Denmark in December. I've been to Copenhagen a few times and it will also be my destination. I've also been to Billund & Helsingør. Do any of my followers have any other recommendations of places to visit, within a few hours of the capital?

I'm wondering about Odense which I think is the third largest city but maybe there are other interesting places on Zealand, Funen or the East of the mainland...

This is a great article. I have always loved postmodernist architecture, having gone past James Stirling's 1 Poultry pretty much every day on my way to school. I wish there was more of it, and more of it was appreciated.

Edwin Heathcote@edwinheathcote.bsky.social

www.ft.com/content/431e... Gaudy, kitsch – and utterly glorious. Save our postmodern interiors

It is such a pity that Koussevitzky—often thought of as the greatest double bass player of his generation—didn't strong-arm all the composers he commissioned (Ravel, Messiaen, Stravinsky etc etc) to write something for his instrument!

Mr. Symphonist@deeplyclassical.bsky.social

While waiting for passage back to England, Britten told conductor Serge Koussevitzky that he couldn't afford to put other work aside to devote himself to writing an opera. Koussevitzky promptly put up $1000 for a commission, and Pears and Britten worked on the scenario on the voyage home.

This is a straight quotation from Pope Francis in 2017 & the subsequent amendment to the Catechism (see link). I’ve always found the word “inadmissible” rather odd, though. It’s a literal translation of the Italian “inammissibile” but is very unidiomatic in English. Why not “forbidden”?

press.vatican.vaNew revision of number 2267 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church on the death penalty – Rescriptum “ex Audentia SS.mi”
This post is unavailable.

I am also always slightly uncomfortable because the only way that this sort of lifestyle is normally possible is because the destinations have a very low cost of living compared to the UK.

Arghh!!! I lived very near Stratford "International" for years and never once wished the Eurostar stopped there. It's 7 minutes on HS1 to St Pancras. The focus really should be on opening the Kent stations, not this...