Gabriele Sarti

Gabriele Sarti

@gsarti.com

Open-source interpretability to seize the means of prediction. Postdoc @ Northeastern, @ndif-team.bsky.social w/ @davidbau.bsky.social. gsarti.com

1.8K followers1K following225 posts

BlackboxNLP is finally almost here! 🎉 Check out our program and see you soon in Budapest!

BlackboxNLP@blackboxnlp.bsky.social

📣 The BlackboxNLP 2026 program is live! Join us on October 29th in Room P3 at @emnlpmeeting.bsky.social for keynotes by @sfeucht.bsky.social , Ivan Titov & @m-hahn.bsky.social, six oral presentations, and two poster sessions! Full schedule: blackboxnlp.github.io/2026/#program

Gabriele Sarti reposted

Take a break from reading up on Navier-Stokes drama and add October 29th to your calendar, as we have a stellar lineup of speakers at this years' BlackboxNLP!

BlackboxNLP@blackboxnlp.bsky.social

🎉 Thrilled to announce the keynote speakers for BlackboxNLP 2026 @emnlpmeeting, with three incredible perspectives on interpretability: 🔍 Ivan Titov 🔍 Sheridan Feucht @sfeucht.bsky.social 🔍 Michael Hahn @m-hahn.bsky.social Join us on October 29th! 🇭🇺

Gabriele Sarti reposted

Due to the unprecedented amount of submissions to BlackboxNLP 2026, we will announce the decisions for Main, Special and ARR commitments on September 2 AoE. Thanks for your patience!

Gabriele Sarti reposted

The @blackboxnlp.bsky.social reproducibility track is in an urgent need for reviewers! If you can review a paper (or two), these bite-sized papers deserve some attention, and reviewing them will leave you fulfilled! 🥰 Please reach out if you can help out! RTs appreciated 👐

We are still looking for emergency reviewers for BlackboxNLP 2026. Please sign up at the link below if you have time to review 1-2 papers before Aug 20 AoE! 🙏

BlackboxNLP@blackboxnlp.bsky.social

With a high volume of submissions this year, we're recruiting additional reviewers for BlackboxNLP 2026! 🗓 Review deadline: August 17 (AoE) 🗓 Review load: 2-4 papers 📝 Sign up: forms.gle/tha166UQZYqX...

An unprecedented number of submissions means an unprecedented need for reviewers! If you have published work in interpretability, please consider signing up to review ⬇️

BlackboxNLP@blackboxnlp.bsky.social

⏳ One week left! The submission deadline for BlackboxNLP 2026 is July 17 (AoE). If you're working on analyzing or interpreting neural networks for NLP, now's the time to get your paper in. 📍 Co-located with #EMNLP2026 in Budapest 🔗 blackboxnlp.github.io

Happy to be a small part of this colossal effort led by @zouharvi.bsky.social to reinvent the future of machine translation evaluation! 🔡 Join us in building the LTB and become a coauthor, help wanted!

Vilém Zouhar @ EMNLP@zouhar.bsky.social

There are many things machine translation still can't do. Help us steer the next direction by contributing hard-to-translate inputs (and be on a cool paper).

Gabriele Sarti reposted

⏳ The BlackboxNLP 2026 Reproducibility Challenge deadline has been extended to July 24 (AoE) ⏳ If you've been working on a robustness check, ablation, or replication of recent NLP interpretability work, you have a bit more time to get your submission in.

Gabriele Sarti reposted

I'd never have guessed models commit to their final answer this early, often within the first 20% of reasoning, across math/logic tasks and model families. The rest is mostly hedging that doesn't change their mind. And turns out they encode this internally, we can decode it! 🧵👇

Sara Candussio@saracandussio.bsky.social

Are all the CoT steps necessary? In our latest paper, we find evidence for the existence of a commitment boundary, marking a sharp transition from no/mid guesses to the model final answer across various reasoning tasks and model families. Thread 🧵👇

🚨New paper led by @danielsc4.it & @saracandussio.bsky.social studying answer commitment across CoT for math & logic reasoning! Turns out, models often converge to final answers early in the CoT, then tend to "fake" hedging & re-checks - and we can tell apart mid/final guesses quite robustly! See 👇

Sara Candussio@saracandussio.bsky.social

Are all the CoT steps necessary? In our latest paper, we find evidence for the existence of a commitment boundary, marking a sharp transition from no/mid guesses to the model final answer across various reasoning tasks and model families. Thread 🧵👇

Our @ndif-team.bsky.social was thrilled to sponsor the BlackboxNLP repro challenge! Interpretability needs more robust & generalizable findings - if you're working in this space, this should be on your radar!

BlackboxNLP@blackboxnlp.bsky.social

🏆 Announcing the NDIF Best Paper Award for the BlackboxNLP 2026 Reproducibility Challenge! @ndif-team.bsky.social Reproduce an interp. finding with nnsight + NDIF, open-source it, and push it further. Winners will receive a $500 prize, and will be invited to present at the workshop!

It was very nice to be back in the Netherlands and EAMT to receive this prize! Thanks to everyone involved 🤗

eamt2026.bsky.social@eamt2026.bsky.social

Huge congratulations to @gsarti.com for winning the #EAMT2026 Best Thesis Award! 🏆✨ His outstanding work on "From Insights to Impact: Actionable Interpretability for Neural Machine Translation" is a brilliant contribution to the community. So well deserved! 👏🚀

Gabriele Sarti reposted

Are you wondering if LLM interpretability results generalize, reproduce, etc.? Check out the reproducibility challenge and submit your work reproducing papers in this area: bsky.app/profile/blac...

BlackboxNLP@blackboxnlp.bsky.social

📣 Announcing the BlackboxNLP 2026 Reproducibility Challenge! A new track dedicated to rigorous robustness checks of NLP interpretability work - stress-testing baselines, ablations, generalizability, and evaluation.

Gabriele Sarti reposted

Replying to @tomerullman.bsky.social

"the new toaster says 'I Love You' when you put the toast in, and 'I'm Sorry' when it burns it. This causes some people to get angry b/c they don't think the toaster means it, and others to develop unhealthy attachments b/c they think it does. the solution is to make the toaster TRULY sorry"

Gabriele Sarti reposted

We don’t always know what problems are hard for LLMs. So devs evaluate on tasks HUMANS find hard or on broad benchmarks. What if we could instead anticipate which scenarios a model will fail on—all without evaluating specific input examples? 🧵NEW PAPER by @jenniferlumeng.bsky.social

Gabriele Sarti reposted

We are starting a new, nonprofit alignment organization, ⊢ Sequent Research, bringing together researchers previously on UK AISI’s Alignment Team, Timaeus, and elsewhere to research how to align superintelligence. We are hiring! 🧵 sequent.org/launch

Gabriele Sarti reposted

The New England Mechanistic Interpretability (NEMI) workshop is coming to BU on Aug. 14! Join us for talks, a panel, food, and plenty of opportunities to connect with the many great researchers in the area. Register and help spread the word!

Micah Benson@micahben.bsky.social

🧠🤖 The 2026 New England Mechanistic Interpretability (NEMI) Workshop will be Aug. 14 at Boston University! Help spread the word and join the New England mech interp community! Registration and submission info in thread:👇

Gabriele Sarti reposted

New blog: I am worried by NLP research culture NLG and NLP are mostly much better in 2026 than when I got my PhD in 1990. Unfortunately research culture has gotten *worse” in this period, which really worries me as I retire. ehudreiter.com/2026/06/08/n...

ehudreiter.comI am worried by NLP research cultureIn most ways NLG and NLP are much better in 2026 than when I got my PhD in 1990. Unfortunately research culture has gotten *worse” in this period, which really worries me as I retire. We have…

Gabriele Sarti reposted

"You're right to call me on that!" Can you catch an AI in the act of lying? Register below to enter our AI lie-detection contest. AI lies are a big problem. The frontier labs have all worked hard to fight AI deception. They all try to monitor their AIs for it.

Check out our latest work led by @veraneplenbroek.bsky.social! Conversation topics seem much better explanations for LLMs behavior over latent sociodemographic info about the user - but what does the choice of topic tell us about the speaker in the first place?

Vera Neplenbroek@veraneplenbroek.bsky.social

When you ask an LLM "What job can I get with no prior experience?" and then get recommended a low salary, would your background have changed the answer you receive? Surprisingly, perhaps not. Check out our paper with @gsarti.com @arianna-bis.bsky.social and Raquel Fernández: arxiv.org/abs/2606.02776

Check out our new hackathon for building the best AI lie detector on the market! A lot of interesting questions and great prizes for participants, apply early if you want in! :)

NDIF Team@ndif-team.bsky.social

Can you tell when an AI model is lying? Announcing Aletheia's Quest, an AI lie detection challenge running this summer, organized by Cadenza Labs and NDIF. Multiple model organisms to interrogate and probe, $50K prize pool, no local GPU required.

Gabriele Sarti reposted

With the large influx of submissions and a faster pace of research, reproducibility is more important than ever. With this reproducibility challenge, we want to put the focus on best practices wrt. baselines🧱, ablations🌈, eval🔎 and generalizability🗺️ of interpretability!

BlackboxNLP@blackboxnlp.bsky.social

📣 Announcing the BlackboxNLP 2026 Reproducibility Challenge! A new track dedicated to rigorous robustness checks of NLP interpretability work - stress-testing baselines, ablations, generalizability, and evaluation.

Despite the huge inflow of researchers, much of the work in interpretability remains anecdotal. Our new repro challenge at BlackboxNLP (co-located with EMNLP 2026) aims to attract work challenging common assumptions and showing failure/success cases of popular methods. Negative results welcome!

BlackboxNLP@blackboxnlp.bsky.social

📣 Announcing the BlackboxNLP 2026 Reproducibility Challenge! A new track dedicated to rigorous robustness checks of NLP interpretability work - stress-testing baselines, ablations, generalizability, and evaluation.

Gabriele Sarti reposted

As a computer scientist, we INVENTED the phrase "artificial intelligence." It was never exclusively yours. In both fact and fiction, AI has always been awesome, and beautiful, and, yes, problematic — and it still is.

John Scalzi@scalzi.com

As a science fiction writer I really fucking resent tech bros for ruining the phrase "artificial intelligence." 80 years of it being all about cool androids and interesting computers destroyed by five years of "Spicy autocorrect making everything shittier for money." NEVER FORGIVE.

Excellent survey on causal interpretability by @amuuueller.bsky.social and many BauLab members, don't miss it!

Computational Linguistics Journal@complingjournal.bsky.social

Interpretability provides a toolset for understanding how and why LMs behave in certain ways. This survey proposes a perspective on interpretability research grounded in causal mediation analysis: doi.org/10.1162/COLI... #NLProc #CLJournal @jannikbrinkmann.bsky.social @amuuueller.bsky.social

Gabriele Sarti reposted

IMO a key skill of a good scientist is moving comfortably between the specific & general e.g., relentless in understand the nerdy details of the data (including its coding) WHILE holding onto the big picture of the hypotheses being tested with the data

Gabriele Sarti reposted

Today we’re releasing EMO, a new mixture-of-experts (MoE) model trained so modular structure emerges directly from data without human-defined priors. EMO can use a small subset of its experts for a given task while keeping near full-model performance. 🧵

Gabriele Sarti reposted

New paper w/ UK AISI: Millions of people now use AI to help them write and communicate. In three experiments (14k participants, 3m+ human ratings) we show that AI writing assistance systematically distorts writer personas – their perceived beliefs, personality, and identity. 🧵

Gabriele Sarti reposted

🚨 Tom Griffiths has a podcast where he interviews cognitive scientists podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/t... This just went to the top of my list.

podcasts.apple.comThe Cognition ProjectScience Podcast · How can we study the mind, something we can never see or touch? This podcast tells the story of how psychologists, neuroscientists, computer scientists, linguists, and philosophers w...
Shahab Bakhtiari@shahabbakht.bsky.social

I’ve been really enjoying Tom Griffith’s "The Cognition Project" lately. A couple of observations: - Hearing the history of the cognitive revolution directly from the giants who lived it is priceless. - Recent AI advances have sort of robbed us of the joy of being amazed by human cognition. 🧠🤖

Gabriele Sarti reposted

2026 is a whirlwind year for AI. Underlying it all is the greatest scientific mystery of our age. How does a neural network think? I talked w Oliver Whang in NYTimes Magazine, on how AI interpretability is a tangle of structure waiting to be unraveled: www.nytimes.com/2026/04/15/...

Gabriele Sarti reposted

Tech industry mottos have a mixed track record. But we should hold idealists to their ideals. And we should celebrate when they come through. The Mythos non-release is a remarkable moment of conviction. Thoughts: davidbau.com/archives/20... Bravo to Anthropic's "race the top".

Thank you for having me! Next time in person! 🤗

MT Group at FBK@fbk-mt.bsky.social

For our seminars at FBK, last week we had a great talk by @gsarti.com on Interpreting Context Usage in Generative Language Models

Gabriele Sarti reposted

Calling attention to an exciting "deception detection" hackathon we're planning this summer! w @NDIF and @CadenzaLabs. Recruiting red teams now, blue teams later. Red teams, time is short: proposals due Mar 31. $10K stipend + compute, $15K finals prize. nnsight.net/blog/2026/0...

Gabriele Sarti reposted

I truly believe the rapid advances in the mech interp subfield have something real to offer AI ethics researchers: A chance to look beyond the HOW of evals to the WHY, a first pass at a technical solution when we see the opportunity, a new avenue for showing failures that prove models are not gods

Gabriele Sarti reposted

🧵New paper: "Lost in Backpropagation: The LM Head is a Gradient Bottleneck" The output layer of LLMs destroys 95-99% of your training signal during backpropagation, and this significantly slows down pretraining 👇

Check out David's NetHack port! "Complexity does not yield to speed. Judgment remains essential. The work of deciding what matters, of seeing what is hidden, of knowing when your own metrics are lying to you: this is the work that remains, and it is the work worth learning."

David Bau@davidbau.bsky.social

The gap between Hack and NetHack taught me something about the future of CS. Worth thinking about. Does Computer Science Still Exist? davidbau.com/archives/20...

This is an important project! If you believe alignment faking is true, you should at least entertain the possibility of misalignment faking before drawing your conclusions. Especially true if researchers fishing for misaligned behaviors are the ones running the evals!

This said, I do agree with the criticism re: model choice. LLaMA 3 70b capabilities are definitely too limited to display the kind of interesting (mis)aligned behaviors. The research question does stand regardless of model choice, though!

BlackboxNLP is back once again at EMNLP'26! Very happy to be part of the team again, and excited for our new reproducibility track! Check it out ⬇️

BlackboxNLP@blackboxnlp.bsky.social

BlackboxNLP will be co-located with EMNLP 2026 in 🇭🇺 Budapest 🇭🇺 this October! This edition will feature a special reproducibility track, investigating generalization and robustness of established results from interpretability research 👷‍♂️ Stay tuned for more details!

Gabriele Sarti reposted

I'm calling it DeepSeek's new 1T parameter model (V4)? The style, content, and length of the reasoning are extremely similar.

This morning I happened to hang out around the Harvard med school café and all conversations I overheard were about LLMs med assistants and XAI 🫡