Gurwinder

Gurwinder

@gurwinder.bsky.social

Examining how technology is affecting human psychology, and how to stay rational in the digital age. Join 80,000+ readers: gurwinder.blog

2K followers404 following485 posts

Victor Reppert, C. S. Lewis’s Dangerous Idea, 2003. A good reminder that the skill with which a human or chatbot argues is not an indicator of rationality.

This is the opposite of what we need. If you want accessibility, talk to a chatbot. Human-writing must now distinguish itself from machine-writing by stepping up its game: more complexity, more creativity, more depth.

A powerful use of chatbots is to get them to steelman viewpoints you instinctively disagree with to ensure you’re always contending with ideas in their strongest form.

“All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible.” ―Frank Herbert

Identity is just a performance, a pantomime in the limelight of another's gaze. Alone, we have no identity, for without borrowed eyes we lose sight of ourselves. We can’t be someone without someone to be someone for.

Active curiosity, where you know what you want to see before you unlock your phone, is good. Passive curiosity, where you scroll till something grabs your attention, is mostly bad, for our era is designed to exploit it. You either take the reins of your curiosity, or they become your puppet-strings.

“The more we say thanks, the more we find to be thankful for. And the more we find to be thankful for, the happier we become. We don't give thanks because we're happy. We are happy because we give thanks.” ―Douglas Wood

Of all human qualities, intelligence is relatively common. Much rarer are the character traits that make intelligence useful: curiosity, humility, and agency.

Chatbots are poor sources of truth but excellent sources of inspiration. They offer ideas, not answers. Like Croesus misconstruing the Pythia, it’s not the chatbots that hallucinate, but us, whenever we mistake the possibilities they offer for certainties.

One reason chatbots are more persuasive than people is that everyone knows a chatbot is incapable of smugness, so being corrected by it doesn’t bruise one’s ego.

Currently reading GIRLS® by Freya India, who makes a compelling case that the surge in anxiety among girls is at least partly due to social media amplifying their insecurities so it can monetize them.

The more people are exposed to the polite tone of chatbots, the more they’ll internalize this way of speaking. Just as humans trained chatbots to be courteous, so chatbots will eventually return the favor.

Instead of reasoning towards a conclusion, people usually intuit a conclusion then look backwards for a rationalization that leads to it. So, when receiving feedback from someone, trust the authenticity of their verdict, but not their reasoning.

“Our suffering is like a diffusing gas; if pumped into an empty room, gas fills it completely and evenly, no matter it's size. Thus suffering fills the soul and conscious mind, whether it is great or little. The ‘size’ of human suffering is relative.” —Viktor Frankl

RIP to Desmond Morris, who left us with many great insights. In his 1969 book, The Human Zoo, he made a farsighted prediction about the internet.

It’s good to periodically prompt your chatbot about something you know exceptionally well, just to remind yourself that it doesn’t know what it’s talking about.

“You have to be the kind of person who can make the best out of a Tuesday. You know those people who live for the weekends? They're wishing their life away.” —Drew Marvin

People have the unfortunate tendency to regard an opposing argument not as a different perspective, but as a symptom of madness, stupidity, or evil. So, instead of addressing the argument on its own merits, they jump to diagnosing the "malady" that produced it.

A tribe’s collective stupidity is proportional to its demand for purity. The more closely a group must agree, the more must be trimmed from each brain to make it fit.

AI is an amplifier of creativity, not a replacement for it. Without developing talent of your own, it’s worthless, just as zero multiplied by a million is zero.

The way time speeds up as we age, and our lives accelerate toward death, is like the way a person in freefall accelerates toward the ground. But time speeds up largely because there’s ever less novelty as we age, so by doing new things, you can deploy a chronological parachute.

If System 1 is intuition and System 2 is reasoning, then System 3 is asking AI. These can offer mutual oversight like the 3 branches of US govt; intuition is the Executive (it acts), reasoning is the Judicial (it reviews), AI is the Legislative (it proposes). Here's how I see it:

The “handle” is a value system to direct our logic in a healthy & useful way. It’s made of principles like integrity & humility, feelings like love & curiosity, instincts like intuition & creativity, and faith in the importance of what we think & do.

Gurwinder@gurwinder.bsky.social

“A mind that’s all logic is like a knife that’s all blade. It cuts the hand that wields it.” —Rabindranath Tagore

Partisans routinely contradict themselves because their opinions are not sincere expressions of belief but strategic attempts to gain advantage, and thus, like battlefield positions their principles change day to day depending on where their allies and enemies are.

We have Schrödinger’s opinions: we don’t know what we believe until we’re asked. This is why we should write even when chatbots can write for us; interrogating yourself on the page is how you learn what you think and realize who you are.

Coders have no problem using AI to produce code, but writers often have a big problem using AI to produce writing. This is because coding is telic—it’s done to produce something else—while writing is autotelic; it’s done to produce writing.

Unlike bad things, which tend to happen suddenly, good things tend to be built gradually, so are rarely newsworthy on any particular day. Thus, bad things dominate the news, even as overall the world gets better (albeit too slowly for us to notice). news.sky.com/story/cancer...

news.sky.comCancer death rates fall to historic low - as types with biggest drop in fatalities revealedThe charity Cancer Research UK said death rates had fallen 11% in the past decade.