Heikki Wilenius

Heikki Wilenius

@hw.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy

Anthropology, politics, software, LLMs, sound, ecology, Indonesia; technology, pedagogy; electronic music, outsider beats Editor of @suomenantropologi, Journal of the […] 🌉 bridged from ⁂ https://fediscience.org/@hw, follow @ap.brid.gy to interact

33 followers8 following39 posts

RE: https://hachyderm.io/@skinnylatte/116130280089882731 This was an insta-buy for me. After playing it for a few hours, I can say that it's a great game for fans of parkour or decolonising processes, and that was an inclusive 'or'!

LLMs are more trigger-happy than humans when it comes to launching a few nukes: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.14740 – "AI Arms and Influence: Frontier Models Exhibit Sophisticated Reasoning in Simulated Nuclear Crises" Queue the WarGames jokes. 🍿 #AIResearch

arxiv.orgAI Arms and Influence: Frontier Models Exhibit Sophisticated Reasoning in Simulated Nuclear CrisesToday's leading AI models engage in sophisticated behaviour when placed in strategic competition. They spontaneously attempt deception, signaling intentions they do not intend to follow; they demonstrate rich theory of mind, reasoning about adversary beliefs and anticipating their actions; and they exhibit credible metacognitive self-awareness, assessing their own strategic abilities before deciding how to act. Here we present findings from a crisis simulation in which three frontier large language models (GPT-5.2, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 3 Flash) play opposing leaders in a nuclear crisis. Our simulation has direct application for national security professionals, but also, via its insights into AI reasoning under uncertainty, has applications far beyond international crisis decision-making. Our findings both validate and challenge central tenets of strategic theory. We find support for Schelling's ideas about commitment, Kahn's escalation framework, and Jervis's work on misperception, inter alia. Yet we also find that the nuclear taboo is no impediment to nuclear escalation by our models; that strategic nuclear attack, while rare, does occur; that threats more often provoke counter-escalation than compliance; that high mutual credibility accelerated rather than deterred conflict; and that no model ever chose accommodation or withdrawal even when under acute pressure, only reduced levels of violence. We argue that AI simulation represents a powerful tool for strategic analysis, but only if properly calibrated against known patterns of human reasoning. Understanding how frontier models do and do not imitate human strategic logic is essential preparation for a world in which AI increasingly shapes strategic outcomes.

RE: https://fediscience.org/@suomenantropologi/115614886106180185 Vale Keith Hart. That keynote from 2010 (link below) was (and still is) a compelling argument for reconnecting value theory to practical political economy by weaving together Marx's commodity fetishism, Mauss's plural economy […]

fediscience.orgOriginal post on fediscience.org
Suomen antropologi (journal)@suomenantropologi.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy

The JFAS team is saddened by the recent passing of Keith Hart, whose work fundamentally shaped economic anthropology. To honor his legacy, @tutam has added the 2011 issue of Suomen antropologi to our digital archives, featuring Hart's keynote "Building the Human Economy: A question of value?" […]

Heikki Wilenius reposted

"Race does not provide an accurate representation of human biological variation. It was never accurate in the past, and it remains inaccurate when referencing contemporary human populations."

anthrofuentes.bsky.social@anthrofuentes.bsky.social

the text that annoyed Trump is from the AABA Statement on Race & Racism... share it widely...BioAnth doing the work-- bioanth.org/about/aaba-s....