Jon Jackson

Jon Jackson

@iamjonjackson.bsky.social

Senior Lecturer at qmul.ac.uk. Working on the affordances, limitations, and risks of Large Language Models (LLMs) in higher education. Co-founder at medilingo.co.uk linkedin.com/in/iamjonjackson open.substack.com/pub/jonathanmjackson

1.3K followers209 following1K posts

Reading a lot on assessment validity and GenAI in HE at the moment 👇 Koretsky, M.D., Ding, M., Chiu, T.K.F., Hallström, J., Li, Y., 2026. The shifting landscape of assessment in STEM education in the age of generative AI. IJ STEM Ed 13, 59, s40594-026-00648–5. doi.org/10.1186/s405...

View full thread

Reading a lot on assessment validity and GenAI in HE at the moment 👇 Koretsky, M.D., Ding, M., Chiu, T.K.F., Hallström, J., Li, Y., 2026. The shifting landscape of assessment in STEM education in the age of generative AI. IJ STEM Ed 13, 59, s40594-026-00648–5. doi.org/10.1186/s405...

The absolute worst thing we could do is to ask students to evidence all the ways they used AI on all assessments as a blanket requirement. Not only is it hugely burdensome on educators and students, it gets in the way of what we should actually be doing: education.

Ridiculously giddy to have been referenced in Mark’s short book along with so many other giants in the field. No, I’m not worthy. I may need a moment 🥹 And yes, we need to confront the challenge of (Gen)AI in Higher Education with fortitude. lnkd.in/p/eG7sia2p

lnkd.inCover | Jon JacksonRidiculously giddy to have been referenced in Mark’s short book along with so many other giants in the field. No, I’m not worthy. I may need a moment 🥹 And yes, we need to confront the challenge of...

I’m teaching a large group of final year software / data students this semester so I might talk to them about this and get their thoughts. It’s an AI / innovation module so we will be engaging with lots of different types of “AI”.

View full thread

I’m not sure use or non-use (of GenAI) has a “right” answer, apart from in some extreme cases. It differs between individuals, and we don’t even know the long term effects.

Can you assess a student’s agency or self-actualisation? That’s what I’m trying to cultivate by means of meaningful (and potentially transformative) project work where students have to become comfortable with uncertainty. Can that be assessed?

I’m teaching a large group of final year software / data students this semester so I might talk to them about this and get their thoughts. It’s an AI / innovation module so we will be engaging with lots of different types of “AI”.

I like to give them lots of choice, and make this an explicit part of their learning journey. They should be making choices about what to do and how to do it, including whether to use GenAI or not but we’re not assessing this specifically.

Any critical AI literacy efforts need to help students and staff navigate these false affordances of GenAI and explore potentially useful but hidden affordances accessible through different prompting techniques. It should also help them be able to decide proactively when not to use GenAI.

Jon Jackson reposted

"Archiving Machines" and "The Patina of Distrust" are co-winners of this year's Best Information Science Book Award from ASIS&T! We're proud to be able to provide both of these books #openaccess. Congratulations authors!

David Ho@davidho.bsky.social

I resigned from ExxonMobil today. I spent the last three years doing fossil fuel extraction research at both BP and ExxonMobil. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing to maximize extraction while the window to act closes, and gambling with our lives. More below.

Imagine you flip a coin and if it turns up heads, a nuclear missile is launched. If it turns up tales, it does nothing. If the nuke is launched, would you say the coin has gone rogue?

View full thread

Imagine you flip a coin and if it turns up heads, a nuclear missile is launched. If it turns up tales, it does nothing. If the nuke is launched, would you say the coin has gone rogue?

Now instead of coins, let’s use a random number generator written in Python which spits out a 0 or 1 which dictates whether the nuke is launched. If the nuke is launched, would you say the Python code went rogue?