Ian Mitchell

Ian Mitchell

@ianmitchell1.bsky.social

Economist working on international development, climate and trade Co-Director, Europe programme at the Center for Global Development.

279 followers25 following75 posts

We think panic from policymakers is a bigger risk than El Niño itself. Includes new analysis of past very strong El Niños which can have big national impacts but historically not global ones

Could a record-breaking El Niño trigger another global food price spike? Grain stocks remain relatively high, providing a buffer against supply shocks. But disruptions to Black Sea exports could leave markets less resilient. Brendan Bayley & @ianmitchell1.bsky.social explore: go.cgdev.org/4AM73SG

The UK has just published the brutal cuts it will make to country spending plans. In 10 of 17 African partners spend is being cut to a de minimis level. They are home to over 130m people in extreme poverty. The UK is giving up meaningful influence and heading for an all-time low in overseas aid.

How does your country rank on its effort on international development? For over 20 years, we assessed policies. This edition sees an unprecedented drop in efforts, with 24 of 38 countries regressing. But there are neglected areas beyond aid - policymakers and advocates should think more broadly.

As aid budgets decline, the ways rich countries are driving development are more important than ever. 🌟NEW: @cgdev.org’s Commitment to Development Index ranks the world’s richest nations, spotlighting impacts on the poorest & where nations can step up ⬇️🧵#CDI2025 go.cgdev.org/49ZJoD5

We're hiring! We're after a recent graduate with quant and comms skills to work with me on ideas for the UK's development policy; and on benchmarking development performance. You need to have the right to work in the UK Full details here: centerforglobaldevelopment.applytojob.com/apply/gIODpv...

centerforglobaldevelopment.applytojob.comResearch Assistant - UK and Development - Center for Global Development - Career PageApply to Research Assistant - UK and Development at Center for Global Development in London, London, United Kingdom.

The UK Government needs to cut £3bn from its aid budget. But can it also fulfill commitments on greater multilateralism, targeting poverty, and ensuring impact? @samhugh3s.bsky.social and I set three tests on aid allocation that would signify the 'change' promised. www.cgdev.org/blog/how-uk-...

cgdev.orgHow the UK Should Focus Its Aid in 2026: Three Tests to Help Ministers Deliver on Commitments and Maximise ImpactThe FCDO must cut nearly £3 billion from its aid budget by 2027. Ian Mitchell and Sam Hughes set out three tests to protect impact.

Ian Mitchell reposted

Very rough and ready estimate of the most affected countries by the new tariffs, apologies for errors. Sources in thread. Cambodia, Vietnam, Nicaragua Guyana all *highly* dependent on exports to US (= to 25%+ GNI), facing tariffs 18-38%.

Ian Mitchell reposted

Make America Great Again by slashing basic health services in the Congo. Hopefully Congress doesn't take these numbers as given.

Charles Kenny@charlesjkenny.bsky.social

New blog by @justsand.bsky.social and me on USAID cuts by country and updated (again) sectoral cuts based on the list that went to Congress today. Ukraine $1.4bn cut. Ethiopia, the DRC, Colombia, South Africa, Palestine, Bangladesh, Kenya, Afghanistan, and Tanzania >$200m

Today's spring statement quietly revealed that the vast majority of the aid cut the PM announced for 2027 will actually happen in 2026. In fact, 2026/27 will see a 27% cut. That is steeper than the Boris Johnson aid cut in 2021. A short thread on the figures:

View full thread

4. The Government is presumably hoping that savings in around £3bn of refugee costs will reduce the size of these impacts - but there's no specific commitment to get them down. Perhaps that will come in the spending review.

Today's spring statement quietly revealed that the vast majority of the aid cut the PM announced for 2027 will actually happen in 2026. In fact, 2026/27 will see a 27% cut. That is steeper than the Boris Johnson aid cut in 2021. A short thread on the figures:

View full thread

2. Between 25/26 and 26/27 the aid budget will fall by around £3.7bn, which is 27%. This is extremely steep for any area of public spend. Boris Johnson's cut in 2021 was £3.1bn, which was a 21% reduction.

3. The Govt has also confirmed it will no longer adjust th aid budget based on GNI - So, if GDP/ national income rises more quickly than expected, the aid budget will not; and if it falls then the aid budget will stay flat. Some stability at least.

Today's spring statement quietly revealed that the vast majority of the aid cut the PM announced for 2027 will actually happen in 2026. In fact, 2026/27 will see a 27% cut. That is steeper than the Boris Johnson aid cut in 2021. A short thread on the figures:

1. Almost three quarters of the cuts will happen in 26/27. The spring statement confirmed aid cuts of - £0.5bn in 2025/26 - £4.8bn in 2026/27 - £6.5bn in 2027/28 This is relative to what aid would have been; and so most (74%) will have taken effect in 2026.

Ian Mitchell reposted

Fascinating this - do Chinese contractors delivering World Bank projects achieve worse outcomes than others? Answer: no. [US and UK contractors also perform around the average but Australian and French ones do less well]

Charles Kenny@charlesjkenny.bsky.social

Paper (with Zack Gehan & Songtao Duan) and blog on Chinese Contractors & Development Project Quality. We take World Bank data on contractors working on projects and match it to project outcome data. Graph below: country of main contract supplier versus project outcome rating.

New @cgdev.org blog from me on the UK aid cut in 2027 as HM Treasury finalise budgets. Just three points: 1) Many are saying the cut needs a 'glidepath'. But this is misleading - glidepaths are supposed to soften cuts. But in this case, it just means making cuts a year sooner.

View full thread

3) The UK's commitment to the World Bank last November wasn't historically generous and should remain a priority. Even as a share of the reduced aid budget in 2027, it's still under 8% of ODA, in line with previous shares

New @cgdev.org blog from me on the UK aid cut in 2027 as HM Treasury finalise budgets. Just three points: 1) Many are saying the cut needs a 'glidepath'. But this is misleading - glidepaths are supposed to soften cuts. But in this case, it just means making cuts a year sooner.

Incredibly clear thread on the US cuts, and the responsibility Secretary Rubio bears for them

Charles Kenny@charlesjkenny.bsky.social

The resulting death toll is an outcome that Secretary Rubio, with his considerable understanding of the power of US foreign assistance to save lives, will have understood was an inevitable result of the pause, failed waivers, and contract terminations. www.cgdev.org/blog/dear-se...

At last some courage and leadership from someone in Labour on international development A mid-sized economic power like the UK cannot spend just 0.3% of income on international issues.

Sam Freedman@samfr.bsky.social

This is the key paragraph of Dodds' resgination letter:

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer just cut the UK aid budget from 0.5% of GNI to 0.3% in 2027 to fund increases in defence spending. He says he’s making tough choices, but cutting funding for the world’s poorest people is the easiest—and cruellest—choice he could make (1/4)

View full thread

Just months ago, at the UN and in his manifesto, Starmer promised to restore Britain’s global leadership on international development. Instead, he’s pushing through a 40% cut, taking the aid budget to its lowest level in over 25 years (3/4)

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer just cut the UK aid budget from 0.5% of GNI to 0.3% in 2027 to fund increases in defence spending. He says he’s making tough choices, but cutting funding for the world’s poorest people is the easiest—and cruellest—choice he could make (1/4)

Ian Mitchell reposted

20 years ago this week Nelson Mandela told a UK audience that poverty was man-made and could be eradicated. Most think aid should tackle poverty - but with the US stepping back - is the UK actually focussed on that goal? Does it still care? A 5-point thread on our new @cgdev.org blog & analysis:

View full thread

5. But with the US stepping back; the poorest countries now face enormous challenges. We argue >50% of the aid should go to Africa in 2025; and something more in line with the 70% of extreme poor that live there over the spending review. And the UK must stop spending its aid in the UK.

20 years ago this week Nelson Mandela told a UK audience that poverty was man-made and could be eradicated. Most think aid should tackle poverty - but with the US stepping back - is the UK actually focussed on that goal? Does it still care? A 5-point thread on our new @cgdev.org blog & analysis:

View full thread

4. The new Labour Government has a mission 'to create a world free from poverty on a liveable planet' Minister Anneliese Dodds confirmed aid allocations for 2024-25 yesterday and - for the first time - these show some progress in re-focussing aid in the poorest places.

20 years ago this week Nelson Mandela told a UK audience that poverty was man-made and could be eradicated. Most think aid should tackle poverty - but with the US stepping back - is the UK actually focussed on that goal? Does it still care? A 5-point thread on our new @cgdev.org blog & analysis:

1. Two thirds of those in extreme poverty live in Africa. But the UK's aid budget is no longer focussed there. The aid budget has suffered a 14% cut - but Africa's budget has been cut by 65%.

2. It isn't just Africa - the UK's aid budget (even the part spent abroad) is much-less focussed on the poorest countries. Under half went to the Least Developed Countries in 2023 - its lowest level in 15 years

Very good piece this from Rachel with practical suggestions for a smart US aid review on advancing American interests.

Rachel Bonnifield@rachelbonnifield.bsky.social

The last week has been v bad for US foreign assistance -- and that's bad for America. But there's still time for Secretary Rubio--who has a track record of supporting smart aid--to avert looming disaster and enact a *real* (and needed!) review and reform. Here's how: www.cgdev.org/blog/changin...

Ian Mitchell reposted

Ian Mitchell reposted

Our new blog highlights how abnormal is the current Gov's policy of using the limited foreign aid budget to fund support for asylum seekers within the UK. Before 2014, nearly no UK asylum seeker support was funded via aid, even when it faced spikes in applicants similar to today's (eg around 2000).

Ian Mitchell@ianmitchell1.bsky.social

Nearly 30% of UK aid is spent on refugees in the UK. But what happened in past refugee spikes? We find if Blair & Brown had taken the current approach, the UK would have spent zero on overseas aid in some years. A 🧵 on new @cgdev.org analysis w/ @samhugh3s.bsky.social: